I have seen such comparisons in wolfenstein 2 youngblood and sharpness was just a little bit better in native 4K without any TAA. However shimmering and aliasing was ruining everything anyway, so it's not like people can play without any AA at all, and when you add AA (even SMAA or FXAA) then DLSS picture quality is superior.
Whether people actually play with AA or not is irrelevant to what I'm asking. It'd help to provide a baseline for image quality comparison without TAA or another form of AA. As it stands now, I don't know if we have the full picture, so to speak.
Every AA blurs picture a little bit, so dont expect DLSS will match native 4K without any AA at all.
I spent some time watching the Riverside benchmark with 4 different approaches to AA: Disable, TAA, TSSAAx8, and DLSS 'Quality'. I agree with your sentiment that on AA disabled the shimmering and aliasing basically kills the visual experience in this game. I would rate TSSAAx8 a little better than TAA. Both are blurrier than DLSS Quality, so you lose some of the fine detail you'd have with AA Disabled or DLSS Quality. The one weakness I noticed with DLSS 'Quality' was on the pass in front of the Megatone building it had issues resolving the spray paint on the building in the right of the scene that says, "Fascistes" a bunch of times. As it pan and zoomed a bit, it caught the detail, so it's not perfect, but imo still better overall than anything else and with a ~40% performance uplift.
Heck do you mean? I can see this being used well into 8k or pretty much any target really.Not without a prediction first, this is not gonna improve the speed, quality, nor the cost, in which people play their games in the long run.
I think it's just that it's a little hard to believe. I mean, the sacrifices to implement this are nearly imperceptible during gameplay. A nearly 40% performance gain... on TOP of the potential TF gain from next gen cards and architecture... This makes RTX actually doable in nearly any game that would allow and use it unlike before where it would have been a big sacrifice to turn on. This will make the difference between consoles and PC RTX implementation absolutely enormous. So I think everyone is checking and double checking the actual real-time results implemented before their eyes, in game, on their hardware, before they go and shout "praise the sun!" And also wait to hear if/how this will impact more games. It's the right attitude to have and I wish console side would have the same instead of just trusting PR...
Currently unknown whether it can be weaponized in the war against the enemy. I think in the PC space, at least here on GAF, it's kind of like "Cool, I'm glad I have it" or "Cool, I hope AMD has it on their next cards".
DLSS 2.0 is simply crazy !
Everyone and their mother will be using this or similar tech going forward.
Yeah, this is the only drawback I've seen so far and I think some of it at least has something to do with the sharpening filter which apparently is adjustable. Pulled this from the DF vid.
the final upgrade for melee in the game consist in her pinning down enemies with the chin and smack em with her jaw, the move is called "manly rampage".
i have to be honest, the technology is bananas, but i'm not gonna get excited for this stuff until they are gonna start to introduce it at launch for every game and not after several weeks or months.
