LostDonkey
Member
It's the pad controls that kill the game on console. It's just not the same regardless of performance.
beast
A game is available for sale, has sold 20 million copies on PC...It has one map, one map all this time. It's now on X and touted as a console mover, a certified big piece in MS's stable and you don't want DF or people to comment or judge what they're playing?its a game in development, to judge it now is a bit crazy.... and threads like this is probably why more devs dont do early access.
Go back to that thread where people thought this would be 60fps on the X, some people just don't take a hint...It's the same way Ark was supposed to be 4k or 60fps on the X too......and the thing can't even do 1080p 60fps on a 1080ti with consistency.As I said before, the game cannot get 60 fps on PC on the lobby and the drop. Sometimes it even drops in red zones.
How the hell was the X gonna get better framerates than a PC? (Even decent fps)
Imagine if there was no specialized team then, 11-12fps on the minimum with awful controls and aiming, by DF's now touted "ATG".....It's the fact that Microsoft shipped in their own specialised team to help get the most out of the consoles, as well as The Coalition (Gears 4 team).
With both teams working on it and it turning up in this state, even at ”early access", it is a problem.
A 30% improvement on clockspeeds on the jaguar is not going to give you a world of difference. The jaguar is not an i7......True, but the X SOC the cpu is 30% clock improvement over standard One, and than something like another 30% improvement from the memory controller and cache improvements. According to this article the resolution is 1080p and 4k. I would have gone with 900p and 1440p.
Case in point, in CPU bound scenarios, you're going to get an uptick of 2-3 fps improvements for the most part....Perhaps you would see a bigger difference, if MS's OS didn't siphon the CPU as much, compared to other consoles...
The graphic looks average at best, it is a shame
A game is available for sale, has sold 20 million copies on PC...It has one map, one map all this time. It's now on X and touted as a console mover, a certified big piece in MS's stable and you don't want DF or people to comment or judge what they're playing?
True, but the X SOC the cpu is 30% clock improvement over standard One, and than something like another 30% improvement from the memory controller and cache improvements. According to this article the resolution is 1080p and 4k. I would have gone with 900p and 1440p.
Its fine to notice it or point it out. But it means exactly nothing. This is a beta test that they suckered people into paying for. Of course its going to run badly. If it performs badly after release, then absolutely they should be criticized, but the first day of early access, people are just reaching for something to attack if they are trying to make a big deal out of this.
People are seriously concern trolling over a game in early access?
L...............T
.....E......S
.........A
.....E......S
L...............T
For PC....which has been in development a considerable amount of time longer than the console version.The final release is in 8 days, December 20th.
They are not going to fix it in 8 days.
I could be wrong but State of Decay 2, Crackdown 3 and Sea of Thieves are all supposed to be out during the 1st half of 2018 I think.The problem is that they are hyping up this game. It has to be their biggest game for a long time. They've even made a commercial around it. They just don't care if it runs like shit at the moment. They just want to have the game first. What else do they have to offer in the coming 6 months or so?
To me..this is the funny part around it.
For PC....which has been in development a considerable amount of time longer than the console version.
People are seriously concern trolling over a game in early access?
People are seriously concern trolling over a game in early access?
Still having more fun playing this on my X than 95% of the games that came out this year
But it's being sold. It's fair game.Calm down its not even finished yet
People are really using a poorly optimized early access game to criticize the power of the XB1X? Do you realize how fucking stupid that sounds?
Its the fact that Microsoft shipped in their own specialised team to help get the most out of the consoles, as well as The Coalition (Gears 4 team).
With both teams working on it and it turning up in this state, even at early access, it is a problem.
a poorly optimized early access game
Does Epic not count making Fortnite? A Battle Royale game my PC can run at 144+FPS?Before saying "unoptimized", ask yourself why no one of the AAA big publishers has attempted to make their own battle royale game, despite PUBG having sold better than any other game this year.
You are missing out, the game is a thrill...even with tech issues. They will work out the bugs.Thats disappointing. I was somewhat interested in this game.
My search for a good console shooter continues.
If a horribly optimized, unfinished game is the some of most fun you've had this year playing a video game, then I am very sorry.
Some 20+ million gamers also seem to be having fun with this game despite all it's warts and short comings. Perhaps there really is something to this game?
Called it months ago. An exclusive partnership with Microsoft doesn't mean Bluehole is suddenly a competent developer.
Dont be, its an absolute blast. Framerate is terrible but we can live with that on the first days of release of a early access. Will criticize if there are no improvements.If a horribly optimized, unfinished game is the some of most fun you've had this year playing a video game, then I am very sorry.