You think PS3 sales will go up this year and next? The US market is shrinking rapidly for all 3 consoles, and Nintendo is launching a new console in Japan with DQX. The PS3 sales in Europe are good, but not that good.
This would help Sony out with 3rd party support and hopefully this means less 'inferior ports' and ports with issues aka Skyrim.
THis kind of news could mean though that we will get a one console future this next generation already. If this rumor is true MS and Sony next consoles will be "functionally" one console the only thing separating them will be services and exclusives. Devs will rejoice.
This would help Sony out with 3rd party support and hopefully this means less 'inferior ports' and ports with issues aka Skyrim.
Whatever about architectural choices, I'm willing to wager Sony's best teams will produce uncommon results next-gen as they did this gen - assuming Sony packs a reasonable amount of power in their box, of course.
This would help Sony out with 3rd party support and hopefully this means less 'inferior ports' and ports with issues aka Skyrim.
You think PS3 sales will go up this year and next? The US market is shrinking rapidly for all 3 consoles, and Nintendo is launching a new console in Japan with DQX. The PS3 sales in Europe are good, but not that good.
THis kind of news could mean though that we will get a one console future this next generation already. If this rumor is true MS and Sony next consoles will be "functionally" one console the only thing separating them will be services and exclusives. Devs will rejoice.
Will it, if the PS4 is weaker than the nextBox won't the same thing happen?
If something doesn't change there might be little reason for those with good PCs to even buy a console. Certainly there will be far fewer that buy all the consoles or even two.
Will it, if the PS4 is weaker than the nextBox won't the same thing happen?
monome said:Form factor.
Reputation.
Ease of set-up.
Proprietary controllers.
Unique IPs.
This is all part of the homogenization and efficiency as the driving force which is affecting everything in our lives. Everything is a commodity in the name of getting "more" for less.
Food, clothes, furniture and now games...unique isn't efficient and it is squeezed out. Livestock and grains, everything is effected.
With gaming...look back three generations...so much in house, unique games, little overlap. Started to blur a bit two gens ago...but really got fuzzy last gen.
Now this gen, hardware wise there was still the unique...but software nearly everything is cross platform.
Next gen? Software and hardware is all lining up. If something doesn't change there might be little reason for those with good PCs to even buy a console. Certainly there will be far fewer that buy all the consoles or even two.
Maybe I am getting ahead of myself...but we have to be approaching a complete lack of differentiation, where everything is essentially a PC, but their are tiers according to level of performance you want to pay for or additional features beyond gaming.
Will it, if the PS4 is weaker than the nextBox won't the same thing happen?
thats what we all have been saying . Their first party can up with amazing titles ,provided the power is there in the console. If SONY is thinking that making something easier to develop will port all third party devs from wii/x360 ,then they are very wrong. SONY's strength this gen has been its HW and first party ,which should remain the same next gen
This thread amuses me. More specifically, the people who think "PC based" = IS a PC and want their PC games to work on it (WTF), expect Steam to be on it (with ony pushing SEN it is time to give up that dream), think PC applications will work on the system.
This is true, and in part because there's so much more control over the hardware and no unnecessary abstractions to accessing it. This is visible with Vita too, as there's no API upon API to do things, features are accessible directly, which results in huge hardware efficiency boosts. Carmack made a good remark about this, talking about Vita vs. Smartphones.Right, but they can have strong hardware and strong software within the parameters presented here, while being 'easier to develop' for. What I'm saying is, if the PS4 was simply a PC in a box, as long as it was powerful enough, I would bet the Naughty Dogs of this world will still work some uncommon magic with it. I wouldn't worry about that.
I don't think so. It would have to be a drastic difference to see any real differences in multiplat games. It sounds like Sony is going to be building the PS4 on commodity hardware, which is awesome news for everybody except the 20 guys crying about backward compatibility.
Doubt it. MS' 1st party teams (the pathetic lot they are) are either working on Kinect games, HAlo or Forza. Halo has never been a graphically powerhouse so that leaves Forza. Sony's first parties are quite surprior.
You think PS3 sales will drop to 0 after next year?
yes, you hate MS. great.
Having the most exotic architecture isn't going to help a platform anyway. It is a shame about BC, though.
Sony was bought by Dell.What exactly is this rumor telling us?
I hate all consoles. Lets get it straight. =) I've owned them all though.
I do apologize for getting confused between 3rd and 1st parties though. I'm sorry.
I bet you first bucks this will never happen and that time will just be used for DLC.
I rather sony got it right with the ps4 and BC than focusing on a distant 20 year old ps5 specs
kuroshiki said:What are you going to do if PS4 has no BC but has Steam support?
Sony was bought by Dell.
Now their consoles have Dell power!
So between this and Microsoft's push to create the Windows 8 Kinectbox, next gen will be the last step before we're finally all just playing on PCs? I'm ok with this, but if it comes down to buying a PC I can't modify with anything but overpriced proprietary parts without voiding the warranty, and building one with only the parts I need and that I can upgrade at any time, I'm not going to waste money on a "console", especially if the game performance will be essentially identical.
Also, couldn't piracy have a greater affect on console sales if every game was built on PC architecture? I'm shuddering thinking about how they are going to address piracy on future consoles as is.
Good, they shouldn't have an R&D budget of more than 100$.
What was it last time? A few billion? And Microsoft got to hit that for free as well
What did the design of Cell cost?You're confusing R&D with production costs.
So between this and Microsoft's push to create the Windows 8 Kinectbox, next gen will be the last step before we're finally all just playing on PCs?
What did the design of Cell cost?
Questions for some of you more tech sapient fellow.
If the PS4 comes out in late 2013 or 2014, possibly using 'off the self' hardware which is already locked down and no more than a year old, what are some realistic expectations for the system? 6000-8000 series GPU, 4 or more Piledriver or Steamroller cores, 40nm or 28nm, super low TDP. Help me out.
Is it possible that if the system isn't released until 2014, Sony could somehow manage to include a high-end GPU and price the barebones SKU for 299.99??
just no, I want the Cell