• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Diamonds are bullshit (no, not literally, but...)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Women also began smoking because of a marketing campaign back in the 1960s.

You'd be surprised what marketing has done to society.

I'm more surprised by people who swear that advertising doesn't effect them because a coca cola commercial doesn't want them to instantly run out and buy a coke. Advertising is far more subtle than that.
 
I doubt most people are intensely aware about how diamonds are mined or how many products are made under slave like conditions. It doesn't mean everyone with a diamond ring are shallow and stupid. What is stupid is to characterize everyone like that and it is a bit hypocritical too considering almost nobody's hands are clean when it comes to buying shit that was made by exploiting people in poorer countries.
 
I just texted my sister and she confirmed it is still 3 months, not 4 like I thought. But just like the arbitrarily contrived raise in tipping % norm, I'm sure 4 months salary will be the cultural norm eventually.

Even three months is a shock to me. I haven't watched much TV the last several years. For most of my life DeBeers ads said two months.
 
I just think it's silly. If you're really measuring the sentimental value in $$, then why is it only $x instead of $x + $1600? If it's the hardness, brilliance, then why go with diamonds and not one of the dozens of other minerals which outplay it in both those aspects at a far lower price? It's completely fucking stupid, and I have to seriously question anyone who threatens a relationship based on dollar amount poured into a glorified piece of useless rock.
 
I dunno if "diamonds diamonds diamonds" is as prevalent outside the US.

It is.

I just think it's silly. If you're really measuring the sentimental value in $$, then why is it only $x instead of $x + $1600? If it's the hardness, brilliance, then why go with diamonds and not one of the dozens of other minerals which outplay it in both those aspects at a far lower price? It's completely fucking stupid, and I have to seriously question anyone who threatens a relationship based on dollar amount poured into a glorified piece of useless rock.

In terms of hardness there aren't really any competitors, but other than that go wild. There's tons of beautiful stuff out there as I tried displaying in a previous post. For hardness, you just need to find something over 7 on the Mohs scale as any lower than that will sustain damage from dust in the long run.
 
I dunno if "diamonds diamonds diamonds" is as prevalent outside the US.

It's not really a thing here in the UK.

If my Girlfriend told me I had to spend 3 months wages on a diamond for her, I'd probably not stop laughing for half an hour. Then, when i realised she was serious, i'd just dump her. Seriously, it's the very definition of spoiled and entitled.
 
I wish it wasn't but it really is a thing in the UK. Maybe not so expensive but I have not met a girl about to get married without a diamond ring.

I've met loads. I know people still have them, but it's not expected. And you certainly aren't required to spend 3 months wages on it.
 
Value is something that is decided by social conventions and not by some invented 'spec list' that lists how useful or not a thing is. If society as a whole places a lot of value on buying a diamond ring for a loved one, then it is important, case closed.
 
But just like the arbitrarily contrived raise in tipping % norm, I'm sure 4 months salary will be the cultural norm eventually.

The rise in tipping norm is a diffuse process driven by a combination of increasingly crappy situations for working-class and service-industry employees and the increasing influence of affluent classes in big cities like NYC or SF on national trends. I don't think it's really super-comparable to diamond expectations (and the same cultural factors that are pushing up on tipping are actually pushing down on engagement ring pricing.)

Is that an actual ad slogan?

Yep.

I doubt most people are intensely aware about how diamonds are mined or how many products are made under slave like conditions. It doesn't mean everyone with a diamond ring are shallow and stupid.

True. There are a million awful, fucked-up things happening in society and nobody can effectively respond to all of them. I think people have both a responsibility to question their own safe choices and push themselves to do better, and to forgive other people because ultimately we're all hypocritical at some level and just trying to get through the day. (I'm a vegetarian but not a vegan!)

My objection is to someone saying "yeah, I know this is wrong, but what will people think of me?!" It's hard to change long-term habits and no one can stop participating in every unjust societal process all at once, but "I don't want people to look at me funny" is putting responsibility on others for what is ultimately a personal choice.
 
I'd like to see game devs subtly undermine the perceived value, by making diamond item drops more common than other gems and give them only medium exchange value in their games.
 
As a materials scientist specializing in metals, I'd love it if I had a significant other who was open to an unconventional engagement ring. I'd definitely come up with something cool.

Value is something that is decided by social conventions and not by some invented 'spec list' that lists how useful or not a thing is. If society as a whole places a lot of value on buying a diamond ring for a loved one, then it is important, case closed.

Case not closed, since the underlying social conventions are subject to change, and 'spec list' type information could inform such a change.
 
Apparently the idea of three months only took hold some time during 2008, except in Japan, where DeBeers tried to sell them on that much earlier.
Got to honor those 5yo traditions.
 
When I proposed to my wife we were both young and had no money, and the ring I could afford was quite a sad little thing. They said it had a diamond in it, but you'd be hard pressed to see it :)

I felt a little guilty about that for a few years after, and I always told her that when things picked up we'd get her a "real" ring. I was sure she was embarrassed when friends and relatives saw it. But, as the years went by, she always insisted it didn't matter.

A few years later, a second trip through school, and we had the money to do such a thing like you were "supposed" to. Instead we took that money and invested it in an education fund for our children. Both of us still believe that was a much wiser decision.

Coming up on 19 years this December, and while a fancy ring for some reason seemed important at the start, we found we really did have more important (and more rewarding) things to put that money towards than a piece of rock whose only purpose is to impress other people.
 
Obviously

imagehgaq5.jpg
 
I don't understand why you think it is better to take a stand against nothing than to take a stand against anything at all at the risk of being hypocritical.

I understand completely why certain people choose the diamond industry to get outraged over and not the industry that makes their shiny new electronic device or sneakers. One they feel compelled to buy by society and the others they just plain want. Fuck whoever because I want it. It is completely selective for obvious reasons.
 
I doubt anyone would notice.

Possible, but at the same time that gives them more reason to actually do it as few people would complain. Marketing manufactured the perceived value and in the long run could help deflate it if enough people start assigning lesser value to it. A virtual downgrade is just one of the practically feasible venues for this.
 
Considering that diamonds are so common, then isn't De Beers using fraud (or something like that) to create high prices when common diamonds aren't rare in the first place?
 
I understand completely why certain people choose the diamond industry to get outraged over and not the industry that makes their shiny new electronic device or sneakers. One they feel compelled to buy by society and the others they just plain want. Fuck whoever because I want it. It is completely selective for obvious reasons.

Electronics markup is low. (Except the Apple tax, lol. And to a lesser extent, the Titan.)
And electronics manufacturers aren't sitting on an enormous pile of stock to artificially create scarcity.
 
As a materials scientist specializing in metals, I'd love it if I had a significant other who was open to an unconventional engagement ring. I'd definitely come up with something cool.



Case not closed, since the underlying social conventions are subject to change, and 'spec list' type information could inform such a change.

Of course, but judging people to be shallow or stupid just because they care about what society thinks is ridiculous and hypocritical.

If everybody suddenly realizes that diamonds are worthless pieces of carbon that are mined by slaves basically and they lose all of their value, something else would come along. If diamonds were cheap there would be no point in buying a diamond: the perceived exclusivity or effort is what you're essentially buying. There is no demand for cheap gems because cheap is the last thing you want in jewelry.

If engagement iPads became the norm, iPads would become more expensive so that people could brag about how much they spent getting that shiny iPad for their loved ones. You're buying a statement, not a rock. I agree it's 'bullshit' but so is everything else people do.
 
My girlfriend is a rockhound and is studying to be geologist. She hates De Beers with a passion, and doesn't even care for jewelry much. If we were to go and get her a ring, we'd probably go dig up the stone ourselves. More likely, I'd just buy her a new gaming PC. She'd get far more use out of it, and it would be about $25k cheaper than the '3 months salary' price range that De Beers suggests.

If buying (or receiving) a diamond makes you happy, then that's fine with me. Just be aware that a lot of suffering has gone into those stones.
 
Really though who cares? (If) Your lady likes it, you buy it and make her happy to stare at the ring every day for hopefully the rest of your life together. It's not like all the other shit we buy isn't created in some horrible way by some giant corporation.
 
Except that synthetic diamonds will likely flood the market, destroying the value of your wife's ring

Plus the fact that slave labor is used to mine natural diamonds

But whatever life is too short to worry about this GET BACK TO DIGGING CHILDREN OR I'LL KILL YOUR FAMILY

So what should I do about it?

Like I said value is perception. My wife likes it, I may have gotten 'ripped off' in that the diamond has no intrinsic value, but what can I, should I do now?
 
Electronics markup is low. (Except the Apple tax, lol. And to a lesser extent, the Titan.)
And electronics manufacturers aren't sitting on an enormous pile of stock to artificially create scarcity.

What about the human price? How does that stack up?
 
Yeah but sadly this has been ingrained in our heads. Try to give your Fiance a Emerald/Ruby/Sapphire ring and people will call you cheap, give her another type of gem and it will look fake or lame no matter how you look at it.

how do synthetic diamonds look? Are they indistinguishable to the naked eye?
 
I understand the part about diamonds being worthless, but aren't they mined in almost exactly the same circumstances as the material that is used in electronics? Doesnt owning a cell phone or laptop make you just as guilty?
 
I understand completely why certain people choose the diamond industry to get outraged over and not the industry that makes their shiny new electronic device or sneakers. One they feel compelled to buy by society and the others they just plain want. Fuck whoever because I want it. It is completely selective for obvious reasons.

True. And at least a diamond engagement ring will last a lifetime while people upgrade their phone every year.

Not that I want a diamond ring or think that's a particularly valuable custom, but it annoys me when people are judgmental of others' consumerist urges while completely ignoring their own ("my smartphone is too small and my iPad is too big, I need a Nexus 7!").
 
I just gave my fiancee a ring of moissanite. 9.5 versus 10 on Moh's scale. Can take double the temperature of a diamond, has higher brilliance, actually ultra rare on Earth (mostly comes from meteorites) and can only be made synthetically (it is a patented thing though). Most of the ones you find are white because that's what people like for weddings but the stones are naturally a yellowish green but only a few jewelers with special hookups to Charles and Covard can carry the fancy colored ones. A diamond the same size would have cost me about 5x more. If you're looking for something objectively better and much cheaper I'd recommend it.

Dude. Thanks for this. That kind of stone sounds very special. I'm going to keep this in mind when I propose and all that stuff...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom