• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Diet-Age: LCHF (I said WOW)

Status
Not open for further replies.
atkbob said:
How did this thread go from buttering bacon to anti-Americanism?
europe.vs.america.jpg
 
K2Valor said:
This diet is incredibly unhealthy. It works, yeah, but in the long run it can not be kept up. A diet is not something you simply just go on to lose a few pounds and then return to your normal lifestyle. You'll just regain the wait. A diet is changing your lifestyle. Eating better, eating less, working out and becoming a more healthy person.

Wait - you mean that in order to have a sustainable diet, a person needs to take personal responsibility to monitor their intake and activities? Shocking!

I thought everyone just needed some fad to get healthy.
 
rezuth said:
and this is related to


How exactly?
Well the diet and exercise industry has been going into overdrive in the US for the last 30 years without any success. i dont see many other countries with as much focus on the health craze like America yet those same countries have lower obesity rates.

EDIT:
Seems pretty clear to me that the standard high carbs/low fat way of dieting doesnt work.
 
Price Dalton said:
Americans moderate their saturated/total fat intake more than the French. Is it working?

You have nothing to back that up. Americans don't moderate shit. People in america eat a whole lot of butter, fried food, oily food. What are you even talking about?
 
Domino Theory said:
http://www.the-gi-diet.org/lowgifoods/

Is that true? Nutella, Snickers Bars and Milk Chocolate are all Low GI foods?
Compared to really low GI foods like green vegetables, no. Compared to other forms of sugar by serving, yes.

Vegetables
Frozen Green Peas 39
Frozen Sweet Corn 47
Raw Carrots 16
Eggplant/Aubergine 15
Broccoli 10
Cauliflower 15
Cabbage 10
Mushrooms 10
Tomatoes 15
Chillies 10
Lettuce 10
Green Beans 15
Red Peppers 10
Onions 10

vs.

Snacks and Sweet Foods
Slim-Fast meal replacement 27
Snickers Bar (high fat) 41
Nut & Seed Muesli Bar 49
Sponge Cake 46
Nutella 33
Milk Chocolate 42
Hummus 6
Peanuts 13
Walnuts 15
Cashew Nuts 25
Nuts and Raisins 21
Jam 51
Corn Chips 42
Oatmeal Crackers 55
 
Number 2 said:
Well the diet and exercise industry has been going into overdrive in the US for the last 30 years without any success. i dont see many other countries with as much focus on the health craze like America yet those same countries have lower obesity rates.

EDIT:
Seems pretty clear to me that the standard high carbs/low fat way of dieting doesnt work.
Guess why? People dont want to stop taking their car everywhere, people dont want to stop playing games and watching tv all day long, people dont want to stop eating that china buffe that is just soooo goooooood.

Obesity and being overweight is a lifestyle problem, not a food one. The food one is just part of the problem with the others combined.
 
Number 2 said:
Its not really some super secret thing that obesity in America has run rampant.

No one is objecting that America is highly obese. Do you know why? People eats a lot of fatty and trans fat food. And they don't excercise enough.
 
Number 2 said:
Compared to really low GI foods like green vegetables, no. Compared to other forms of sugar by serving, yes.

Vegetables
Frozen Green Peas 39
Frozen Sweet Corn 47
Raw Carrots 16
Eggplant/Aubergine 15
Broccoli 10
Cauliflower 15
Cabbage 10
Mushrooms 10
Tomatoes 15
Chillies 10
Lettuce 10
Green Beans 15
Red Peppers 10
Onions 10

vs.

Snacks and Sweet Foods
Slim-Fast meal replacement 27
Snickers Bar (high fat) 41
Nut & Seed Muesli Bar 49
Sponge Cake 46
Nutella 33
Milk Chocolate 42
Hummus 6
Peanuts 13
Walnuts 15
Cashew Nuts 25
Nuts and Raisins 21
Jam 51
Corn Chips 42
Oatmeal Crackers 55

Hmm, judging from the scale they gave:

Low GI = 55 or less
Medium GI = 56 - 69
High GI = 70 or more

Having all your daily meals and snacks be the foods listed under 55 would be a great diet, no?
 
Price Dalton said:
Sorry, I thought that's how we were doing it in this thread. My mistake.

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1768013

Saturated fat intake versus heart disease on a global scale. Some interesting results.

fkcuog.png
I'm sorry but I was asking where they moderate it. Not that they by a coinincidence happen to eat more or less of something. Because guess what? That part of their lifestyle. So instead of linking me to some guesses made I would rather you link me to something which we can draw a conclusion from.
 
rezuth said:
Guess why? People dont want to stop taking their car everywhere, people dont want to stop playing games and watching tv all day long, people dont want to stop eating that china buffe that is just soooo goooooood.

Obesity and being overweight is a lifestyle problem, not a food one. The food one is just part of the problem with the others combined.
Of course there are other factors in play when it comes to obesity. The fact of the matter is that high fat/medium protein/low carb diets and ways of eating are not dangerous.. the science has been proving that they are beneficial and has been for some time.

My own personal anecdote... i lost about 60lbs just on a ketogenic diet. i didnt exercise because i was working 12-14 hours per day and im a lazy person by nature. The weight just fell off once i cut out all forms of sugars, starches and high carb veggies. The whole process took about 6 months. A coworker of mine lost over 100 lbs doing the same thing for a year. No sodas, no candies, no rices, no potatos, no breads.. just green vegetables and meats. Also no exercise.
 
this is rediculous. If you were really serious about losing weight, you would look towards more long-term options. You need to eat a balanced diet, eat less, and exercise regularly. If your not keen on lifting weights or running, can i suggest matial arts? it works all of your muscles, and builds your fitness up gradually. and you can still exercise and eat less. don't eat nothing, but if you over eat (see: 6 eggs for breakfast) you are only going to gain weight and make yourself horribly ill in the long run. it doesn't need to be backed up with statistics, its common sense! Eating a diet like that is going to do you no good.


also its carbohydrates, not carbons. sorry, that was really annoying me.


Number two, taking out the carbs is not nessisarily a bad thing, but eating only whipped cream, butter and meat is different.
 
Number 2 said:
Of course there are other factors in play when it comes to obesity. The fact of the matter is that high fat/medium protein/low carb diets and ways of eating are not dangerous.. the science has been proving that they are beneficial and has been for some time.

My own personal anecdote... i lost about 60lbs just on a ketogenic diet. i didnt exercise because i was working 12-14 hours per day and im a lazy person by nature. The weight just fell off once i cut out all forms of sugars, starches and high carb veggies. The whole process took about 6 months. A coworker of mine lost over 100 lbs doing the same thing for a year. No sodas, no candies, no rices, no potatos, no breads.. just green vegetables and meats. Also no exercise.
and vice versa.
 
Brashnir said:
Didn't you know? Up until 1902, humans hibernated. World Wars 1 and 2 were caused because everyone was cranky due to sleep deprivation.
:lol

It was poorly put.

Humans "starved" during this period, I was thinking of the bear (prev. ex) when I wrote it.
 
shanshan310 said:
this is rediculous. If you were really serious about losing weight, you would look towards more long-term options. You need to eat a balanced diet, eat less, and exercise regularly. If your not keen on lifting weights or running, can i suggest matial arts? it works all of your muscles, and builds your fitness up gradually. and you can still exercise and eat less. don't eat nothing, but if you over eat (see: 6 eggs for breakfast) you are only going to gain weight and make yourself horribly ill in the long run. it doesn't need to be backed up with statistics, its common sense! Eating a diet like that is going to do you no good.


also its carbohydrates, not carbons. sorry, that was really annoying me.


Number 2 said:
No sodas, no candies, no rices, no potatos, no breads.. just green vegetables and meats.

taking out the carbs is not nessisarily a bad thing, but eating only whipped cream, butter and meat is different
.

It's not only that... a meal can be of:

Chicken with a fat sauce (feta cheese in creame frachice for an example).
To this you can server oven baked paprika.
 
Number 2 said:

Because carbohydrates make you store the fat instead of using it when you are hungry.
Intead the carbs will be consumed.
 
Number 2 said:
Great, these two year studies show that people drop in weight faster. Where are the ones that say that eating normal is bad for you compared with GI? Where are some that are done long term?
 
Here was my daily meal when i was losing weight (i still need to lose weight but am out of spare money at the moment and am living off ramen and rice pretty much)

Breakfast
2 eggs
3 strips turkey bacon

Lunch
2 cans tuna
a couple Tb mayo
some hot sauce

Snack (i changed these up when i got bored)
almonds
peanuts
sunflower seeds

Dinner
Chicken Caesar salad

Lunch and Dinner could be swapped out. About once a week i would get a petite cut sirloin steak and have that cooked in butter and hotsauce with a side salad.
 
Number 2 said:
Here was my daily meal when i was losing weight (i still need to lose weight but am out of spare money at the moment and am living off ramen and rice pretty much)

Breakfast
2 eggs
3 strips turkey bacon

Lunch
2 cans tuna
a couple Tb mayo
some hot sauce

Snack (i changed these up when i got bored)
almonds
peanuts
sunflower seeds

Dinner
Chicken Caesar salad

Lunch and Dinner could be swapped out. About once a week i would get a petite cut sirloin steak and have that cooked in butter and hotsauce with a side salad.

Almost identical what I ate yesterday!
 
Price Dalton said:
Sorry, I thought that's how we were doing it in this thread. My mistake.

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1768013

Saturated fat intake versus heart disease on a global scale. Some interesting results.

Former Soviet bloc on the left half of the data plots and Western Europe on the right half with better healthcare access, more red wine/fresh fruit/vegetable consumption, and less smoking. Hardly conclusive.

To quote your cited study, "The average consumption of animal food groups, with the exception of fish, was positively associated with 25 year CHD mortality rates. Furthermore, the average population intake of saturated fat was strongly related to 10 and 25 year CHD mortality rates."

There's evidence on both sides of the debate, but the balance of data favors one side.
 
rezuth said:
Great, these two year studies show that people drop in weight faster. Where are the ones that say that eating normal is bad for you compared with GI? Where are some that are done long term?
First of all thats not what i said. i said that high fat/medium protein/low carb diets are showing via studies to not only not be harmful, but beneficial to health. Second i didnt bring up the GI.. i was responding to someone asking if Snickers and chocolate were really low according to that site they posted.

If you refuse to believe whats right in front of your face, that sounds like a personal problem... it sure isnt mine. Continue pushing whats comforting to you while you ignore the facts. ive found nutrition is just like anything else in the modern world (politics, religion, video games).. people choose their side and will defend to the death what they believe. i just find it funny that people rail on Atkins-like diets because they think that all they consist of is hamburger, steak, bacon and lard. When on that diet i ate more salads and consumed more fiber in three days time than most people eat in a month.. and my weight loss and energy was physical proof.
 
The human race began and has existed for a far longer time on a diet that is quite similar to Atkins, than on a neolithic agricultural type of diet. All those "carb" products are with a few similarly troublesome exceptions (potatoes mainly) essentially domesticated grass. Domesticated not for it's high nutritional value but because of its relative ruggedness, high raw energy value, and ease and speed of growing.
Trouble is, humans weren't meant for such a high intake of grass seeds (it gets even worse when you consider how much the different strains of grass has been pushed to the extreme to produce grain with high energy above everything else, especially in the last 100 years).
Humans were meant to eat meat (either by God or through evolution, it doesn't really matter because it's plainly evident from our digestion system), and as much as we can too. A lot of evidence points to meat being the sole reason for our large brains compared to other primates. You need a lot energy and time to develop a brain like ours. For that you need a steady and good supply of energy and building blocks (proteins and vitamins). The trouble with modern meat though, is that most domestic animals has been on a very monotonous diet of grain, to fat them up quickly. This leads to low quality meat, with unhealthy fat in it.
The solution is to eat smaller amounts of expensive high quality meat, coupled with less expensive but still high quality meat like chicken. Also, if you live in coastal areas were fresh fish is relatively inexpensive, seafood is a great way to get a lot of meat and fish oils.
Atkins isn't the end all and be all of diets, but he no doubt was on to something.
 
Squeak said:
The human race began and has existed for a far longer time on a diet that is quite similar to Atkins, than on a neolithic agricultural type of diet. All those "carb" products are with a few similarly troublesome exceptions (potatoes mainly) essentially domesticated grass. Domesticated not for it's high nutritional value but because of its relative ruggedness, high raw energy value, and ease and speed of growing.
Trouble is, humans weren't meant for such a high intake if grass seeds (it gets even worse when you consider how much the different strains of grass has been pushed to the extreme to produce grain with high energy above everything else, especially in the last 100 years).
Humans were meant to eat meat (either by God or through evolution, it doesn't really matter because it's plainly evident from our digestion system), and as much as we can too. A lot of evidence points to meat being the sole reason for our large brains compared to other primates. You need a lot energy and time to develop a brain like ours. For that you need a steady and good supply of energy and building blocks (proteins and vitamins). The trouble with modern meat though, is that most domestic animals has been on a very monotonous diet of grain, to fat them up quickly. This leads to low quality meat, with unhealthy fat in it.
The solution is to eat smaller amounts of expensive high quality meat, coupled with less expensive but still high quality meat like chicken. Also, if you live in coastal areas were fresh fish is relatively inexpensive, seafood is a great way to get a lot of meat and fish oils.
Atkins isn't the end all and be all of diets, but he no doubt was on to something.

The Paleo diet.

You don't get much more basic or definitive than evolution.
 
fanboi said:
Also for you who say, train more etc.

When you train (quick runs, lift weights etc) you build muscles, you dont burn fat.

To burn fat you have to train low intervall (don't now what word here either!), basically means that you burn more fat from a long walk then of running quick 4-5 km.



Yes, but as I said I have stayed this weight for a long time now, this has never ever happend before I tried this.

Of course it isn't much (as I said, I have cheated sometimes and that can have quite an impact), but it is something for one that have struggled and worked hard just to lose some kg.

Are you an idiot?

You DO know that when you build muscle it consumes fat when in a resting state? And it's proven that weight lifting consumes higher amounts of calories than most cardio work?
 
Mecha_Infantry said:
Are you an idiot?

You DO know that when you build muscle it consumes fat when in a resting state? And it's proven that weight lifting consumes higher amounts of calories than most cardio work?

He also said this...

fanboi said:
EAT LESS. WORK OUT MORE. Is quite impossible (if you train correct) since you need to eat ALOT more since you lose alot more energy.

...as if losing energy (since fat = stored energy) wasn't the very definition of losing weight.
 
Food and drink high in saturated fat and sugar:

• We need fat in our diet but the right kind i.e. mono or polyunsaturated fats not the saturated fats that are found in cakes biscuits and chocolate. Any fat that is solid at room temperature is likely to be a saturated fat (cheese, butter, lard etc).
• Fats and sugar are high in calorific value. If you take in more calories than you need, your body will convert them to fats and store them.
• Food high in saturated fat is usually high in cholesterol which is another major factor in deposits being laid down in your arteries. Lowering your harmful cholesterol (LDL) by reducing saturated fat will help prevent this. If you eat at least 5 portions of fruit and vegetables a day and take regular exercise you will increase your protective cholesterol (HDL) which helps to get rid of LDL.

atheroma.gif


I can see how this diet will eventually reduce your weight through decomposition.
 
Brashnir said:
He also said this...



...as if losing energy (since fat = stored energy) wasn't the very definition of losing weight.

When you eat carbs, they will go first, and not the fat reserves.
Of course if you train long enough fat reserves will start to burn.
 
So I once weighed 320 pounds.

I woke up one day and said, "I think I'm going to lose weight."

I walked daily for 45 minutes, and I stopped eating that complete crap that Americans fill their bodies with. Example: Soda, burgers, hotdogs, fried food, and all of that.

I ate a nice sandwhich filled with veggies everyday on some wheat bread. I ate a nice big bowl of whole grain cereal that was flavored and had sugar in it, along with 2 pieces of peanut butter bread. I ate everything in decent proportions and lived off of about 1900 calories a day. I was not starving all the time, and if I did get hungry I would snack on raw vegetables or eat fruit. Yep, I ate that deadly fruit stuff that so many diets tell you to stay away from.

Moral of the story. Eat in moderation and exercise and weight loss is easy. Stop making it complicated with these stupid unhealthy diets. In fact, change your lifestyle and it's a breeze to keep the weight off.

I now weigh 198 pounds. I can eat sweets if I want to, and drink a soda if I want to. I just do it in moderation and continue to exercise and the weight stays off and I stay healthy.
 
nastynate409 said:
So I once weighed 320 pounds.

I woke up one day and said, "I think I'm going to lose weight."

I walked daily for 45 minutes, and I stopped eating that complete crap that Americans fill their bodies with. Example: Soda, burgers, hotdogs, fried food, and all of that.

I ate a nice sandwhich filled with veggies everyday on some wheat bread. I ate a nice big bowl of whole grain cereal that was flavored and had sugar in it, along with 2 pieces of peanut butter bread. I ate everything in decent proportions and lived off of about 1900 calories a day. I was not starving all the time, and if I did get hungry I would snack on raw vegetables or eat fruit. Yep, I ate that deadly fruit stuff that so many diets tell you to stay away from.

Moral of the story. Eat in moderation and exercise and weight loss is easy. Stop making it complicated with these stupid unhealthy diets. In fact, change your lifestyle and it's a breeze to keep the weight off.

I now weigh 198 pounds. I can eat sweets if I want to, and drink a soda if I want to. I just do it in moderation and continue to exercise and the weight stays off and I stay healthy.

Good for you!
One of the most impressing people I find is the ones that loses massive amounts of fat from their body... you are a hero :)

But the problem with me and my gf is the sugar problem... which is caused på carbs...
If I eat this diet I lose the desire to plunge into a bag full of sweets, the desire never goes away 100%, but it's manageble.

But do you have a before and after pic? I find it very intersting to see the difference.
 
nastynate409 said:
So I once weighed 320 pounds.

I woke up one day and said, "I think I'm going to lose weight."

I walked daily for 45 minutes, and I stopped eating that complete crap that Americans fill their bodies with. Example: Soda, burgers, hotdogs, fried food, and all of that.

I ate a nice sandwhich filled with veggies everyday on some wheat bread. I ate a nice big bowl of whole grain cereal that was flavored and had sugar in it, along with 2 pieces of peanut butter bread. I ate everything in decent proportions and lived off of about 1900 calories a day. I was not starving all the time, and if I did get hungry I would snack on raw vegetables or eat fruit. Yep, I ate that deadly fruit stuff that so many diets tell you to stay away from.

Moral of the story. Eat in moderation and exercise and weight loss is easy. Stop making it complicated with these stupid unhealthy diets. In fact, change your lifestyle and it's a breeze to keep the weight off.

I now weigh 198 pounds. I can eat sweets if I want to, and drink a soda if I want to. I just do it in moderation and continue to exercise and the weight stays off and I stay healthy.

Congrats, man. Your diet was a high-fat diet, though. In fact, every diet is a high-fat diet. What do you think was happening to all that body fat? It was being burned for energy as if it were dietary fat.
 
Number 2 said:
Breakfast
2 eggs
3 strips turkey bacon

Lunch
2 cans tuna
a couple Tb mayo
some hot sauce

Snack (i changed these up when i got bored)
almonds
peanuts
sunflower seeds

Dinner
Chicken Caesar salad
Jeez, you people eat like birds. No wonder you lose weight.

I'm a pretty small guy, 5'7" 145 lbs. I'm clean bulking right now so my goals are going to be slightly different, but I only need to lower my total caloric intake slightly and up my cardio frequency to cut pretty quickly.

Meal 1:5:30 am - Cheerios, protein shake (all I have time for in the morning, I'm at work at 6am)
Meal 2:7:30 am - chicken wrap using flax, whole grain, and oat lavash bread. 1 half wrap, 4-5 oz chicken, lettuce, and 1 slice pepperjack cheese
Meal 3: 9:30 am - meal replacement shake. 20g carbs, 5 g fat, 40g protein, 280 cals
Meal 4:11:30 am - grilled chicken sandwich with lettuce, tomato, one slice of pepper jack cheese
meal 5: 2:30 pm - meal replacement shake

meal 6 -4:00pm -one slice "exekial" bread, whole grain bread from sprouted grains, 4 oz chicken

5:00 - GYM

meal 7: 6:00pm: post workout shake - 40g protein, 30g dextrose, 30g maltodextrin
meal 8 7:00pm:my variation for the day. good meal with plenty of protein, maybe a half cup of brown rice, and some good fats
meal 9: 9:00pm - big bowl of cottage cheese just before bed

those are my weekdays. weekends are a bit weird because it's tougher to rigorously schedule myself.
 
These threads always piss me off, but I can never stop myself from looking. The only ones in this topic worth listening to are Prince Dalton and Snrub. Dalton'll happily link the studies that I've long since stopped linking because I'm tired of fighting the uninformed masses. FWIW, if you're thinking about a LCHF diet, listen to him. No, they aren't unhealthy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom