You do realize that every country in Europe has its own different complete set of dishes, and in each country, you have multiple regional specific dishes.
You do realize its the same case in America. People in California don't even know what fried okra is, whereas in the south its a common side item.
I miss my US food. My body craves it all the time but I get some decent food here
Pret and Eat also sell pastries, by your definition are they bakeries as well?
FYI this is what a bakery in Europe looks like and what I mean:
![]()
![]()
That like max level cultural appropriation mate...
Mexico is not the US
Salvador is not the US
Ethiopia is not the US
People keep failing to understand what is being discussed here.
Its not American food versus European food, its food you find in those countries. Which is why Britain and especially America excel in this, because they are more international, and more willing to give up their boring traditional food.
If you knew much about Britain, you'd know its pretty rare to eat traditional British food. Thats the difference. The rest of Europe just eat their boring combinations of meat and potatoes. Britain is obviously the country that is most touched by immigration and the cultures associated it with that. Which is why it is said Pakistani and Indian food is considered the national cuisine often. The ubiquity of Pakistani cuisine in Britain alone makes the food in that country better than any European country.
And obviously London is by far the most international and global city in Europe hands down, and the cuisine reflects that.
The rest of Europe you just find their own cuisine mainly, and its mostly shit. Sorry, outside of perhaps Greek food, all European food is mediocre and inferior compared to Middle Easten, Asian, and South American cuisines. You get much more of these superior foods in London than anywhere else in Europe.
Still, it all still pales to NYC, i'd say, though.
The foods consumed in the majority of Europe, is boring and old. Portugal, Germany, Belgium, Eastern Europe, Switzerland, Spain man all of those places suck. Spains national dish is a bland mixture of shrimp, chicken and chorizo. What kinda of fucked up combination of meats is that? Nasty.
You do realize its the same case in America. People in California don't even know what fried okra is, whereas in the south its a common side item.
Good British beer is all about the Craft Breweries. There is so much variety if you know where to look.Orval is great too, so is Rodenbach and St Bernadus. Point remains what British beers match or exceed these because I've been missing out.
Yup. Some folks here really need to watch some Anthony Bourdain. And btw, saying that UK milk is the best and then posting some Arla crap is rich. UK milk can't compare to milk from Northern Germany since we have better cattle and more fertile soil. Also milk tastes the best when it's fresh and still warm.Been to 53 countries. You find good food and bad food everywhere. Shop wisely and pursue a balanced diet.
You get crap food in America, you get crap food in Europe. If your experience of a country's cuisine is limited to fast food and franchise restaurants then you're always going to be disappointed.
It's like holidaying in the UK and living off Greggs cheese pasties and fish and chips, it's no indication of the great food that's out there in pretty much every town and city. It's the same in America.
Italian pizza disliked??? I assume they were eating in the tourist traps of Rome, or were missing the pineapple.
I agree about your general point concerning the US- and you can find great good in London - but average food in london is *shit*, and far worse than most big European cities.People keep failing to understand what is being discussed here.
Its not American food versus European food, its food you find in those countries. Which is why Britain and especially America excel in this, because they are more international, and more willing to give up their boring traditional food.
If you knew much about Britain, you'd know its pretty rare to eat traditional British food. Thats the difference. The rest of Europe just eat their boring combinations of meat and potatoes. Britain is obviously the country that is most touched by immigration and the cultures associated it with that. Which is why it is said Pakistani and Indian food is considered the national cuisine often. The ubiquity of Pakistani cuisine in Britain alone makes the food in that country better than any European country.
And obviously London is by far the most international and global city in Europe hands down, and the cuisine reflects that.
The rest of Europe you just find their own cuisine mainly, and its mostly shit. Sorry, outside of perhaps Greek food, all European food is mediocre and inferior compared to Middle Easten, Asian, and South American cuisines. You get much more of these superior foods in London than anywhere else in Europe.
Still, it all still pales to NYC, i'd say, though.
The foods consumed in the majority of Europe, is boring and old. Portugal, Germany, Belgium, Eastern Europe, Switzerland, Spain man all of those places suck. Spains national dish is a bland mixture of shrimp, chicken and chorizo. What kinda of fucked up combination of meats is that? Nasty.
This is quite inaccurate. How did you reach this conclusion/where are you from?I agree about your general point concerning the US- and you can find great good in London - but average food in london is *shit*, and far worse than most big European cities.
Good British beer is all about the Craft Breweries. There is so much variety if you know where to look.
It's no coincidence that both World Wars originated in Europe, right?As an American coming into this thread now...
letthemfight.gif
Yup, most Brazilians dont like it. We are used to pizzas with a lot of topping, not those italian things that they call "pizza" where you need to be lucky to eat any topping. We dont eat one pizza per person because of that, you can easily share one pizza in 3 or 4 people. Btw sao Paulo is the city with more pizzarias per person in the world.
Anyway, as I cant eat Brazilian pizza in Spain, I've been eating in a Italian restaurant and I got used to it and even enjoy it (while still missing the real one). But when people visit Italy they dont like it in general.
I reached that conclusion from living in London. It's an opinion of course but reached by the large majority of non Brits I know living in London.This is quite inaccurate. How did you reach this conclusion/where are you from?
It's no coincidence that both World Wars originated in Europe, right?The topic was about US vs Europe food and us Europeans managed to pick up a fight amongst ourselves.
I had some nice craft brews last time I was in the Lake District, any recommendations?Good British beer is all about the Craft Breweries. There is so much variety if you know where to look.
Based on that post or in general?
Yup, most Brazilians dont like it. We are used to pizzas with a lot of topping, not those italian things that they call "pizza" where you need to be lucky to eat any topping. We dont eat one pizza per person because of that, you can easily share one pizza in 3 or 4 people. Btw sao Paulo is the city with more pizzarias per person in the world.
Anyway, as I cant eat Brazilian pizza in Spain, I've been eating in a Italian restaurant and I got used to it and even enjoy it (while still missing the real one). But when people visit Italy they dont like it in general.
It's pretty fun how you left out Italy and France.
I've heard Americans drink sodas during lunch/dinner :/
Pizza in America takes many forms... most predominantly being the flat kind with crust.What tells pizza from "pizza" is not the topping, it's how you prepare, flatten and cook the dough. What americans call pizza is usually a pie shaped like a pizza. Literally glorified salted cakes, or as well call them, "flat cakes".
Usually when you go to a place worth the time, as long as you're willing to pay they're also willing to put any topping you want on your thing. The base is what matters, and only the flat pizza with crust is the real deal.
When you visit a foreign place you're generally at a disadvantage when it comes to food. Yes, you can consult Yelp or some locals, but you're mostly flying blind. I had one of the worst sandwiches of my life in France, and the worst pizza I've ever eaten was in the Netherlands... doesn't mean all French or Dutch cuisine must suck, or be inferior to that found in my homeland. Just means I didn't know what I was doing when I was there. It's easy to know all the good spots when you've lived somewhere for decades, not so much when you're only somewhere for two weeks.I have been in New York twice for 2 weeks each and everything I tried from Indian over Italian to Sushi I had either far better or similar here in Berlin where I live for far less too. I was fairly disappointed tbh since NYC is so praised. It wasnt bad by any means, but not good enough for the asking price. The variety is certainly there, but the same can be said about my city.
Ethiopia aside:
![]()
Here you have a fancy looking map with flags, of what the real América is, and not the appropriated term by the modern people of the United States.
It's not appropriation it's in the name of our country... This were Americans. If you y'all wanted to be called Americans you should have put America in your name. Which is more important being identified as an American or being identified as the country you're from?
Not only that but the rest of the world outside of the Americas calls us Americans it's not just US citizens.
If you y'all wanted to be called Americans you should have put America in your name.
If you limited American food to American cuisine, they have beyond terrible food. But the U.S. is a immigrated countries and all bigger cities have a variety of cuisines from different parts of the world. In that sense it's ok.
America doesn't have any variety in bread which makes Europe automatically superior.
idk why but I just love this pictureUS knows how to appreciate a good italian meal
![]()
Processed food in the US is way worse than in Europe. I had some corn puffs that absolutely dripped with fat. They were better used as bbq fire starters than food. They were nowhere near as fluffy and crunchy as the corn puffs around here. Most processed foods in the US contain far more fat, sugar and salt than in Europe.
Also, they tend to put too much salt in cooked food as well. Went to several restaurants and could tell the difference in saltiness between what they served and what restaurants serve around here.
lmao what is American cuisine to you?