• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Disney's 'Beauty and the Beast' (Emma Watson) Teaser Trailer

Status
Not open for further replies.
No the original thread title also spelled Disney as Dinsey or something. When I fixed the typo I also corrected the other grievous error. :P
Disney better have your check in the mail. I know I can't be the only whose interest level went from 0/10 to a strong 3/10.
 
Perched for this
always like beauty and the beast a lot more than Cinderella or Sleeping beauty, not to mention that cast has some of my favourite actors/actresses

emma Thompson as Mrs Potts is going to be life altering
 
Is Luke Evans roughly the size of a barge?

YuCizhg.gif
 
I think teaser trailers are basically for people who are going to see a film no matter what.

This showed me nothing. A few fanservice moments like the rose, music, and lines from the animated film recreated, but I figured they would have at least one shot of the Beast or Belle in a dress or something.
 
She's an attractive woman, just not what I would consider an exceptional beauty. It also doesn't help that she looks a bit like Richard Dawkins and my ex-boss's son.
 
She's an attractive woman, just not what I would consider an exceptional beauty.

So she's cute, no, straight up attractive, but that's not good enough for the character? Belle's pretty, but I don't see how Emma doesn't have the looks for the role. It's not titled The Most Beautiful Woman Ever and the Beast.


Just not seeing it, man :p that's clearly a beautiful woman.
 
If Watson isn't a Beauty, I'm not fit to even be a Beast.

Some of y'all are crazy.

Also some of y'all shouldn't hate on de Ravin as Belle either.

My Kodi setup knows what's up:
OUAT Belle was great, what are some of you saying?



Belle in that show hasn't done much as of late. She'd been strategically written out
(into a literal box)
while her actress was on maternity leave. But she's still one of my favorite characters in there.
 
So she's cute, no, straight up attractive, but that's not good enough for the character? Belle's pretty, but I don't see how Emma doesn't have the looks for the role. It's not titled The Most Beautiful Woman Ever and the Beast.



Just not seeing it, man :p that's clearly a beautiful woman.

When you call someone a "beauty," you're not just calling them beautiful.. It's absolutely a comparison to other attractive people. It should be someone so beautiful, everyone else looks like ass.
 
When you call someone a "beauty," you're not just calling them beautiful.. It's absolutely a comparison to other attractive people. It should be someone so beautiful, everyone else looks like ass.

I mean, calling someone a beauty is absolutely calling them beautiful, it's the same damned word. And the person you're describing in that last bit doesn't exist.
 
When you call someone a "beauty," you're not just calling them beautiful.. It's absolutely a comparison to other attractive people. It should be someone so beautiful, everyone else looks like ass.

Again, in the story only a delusional tea cup calls her beautiful. And that's to her stupid, illiterate son. Belle herself does not want to be seen as merely beautiful, the sae way as old furbag doesn't want to be seen as a beast. People forcing the terms on them drives their entire arcs because neither agrees with/wants the life that the terms provide.

Or, to put it another way, it's meta as fuck that Emma Watson is playing someone who doesn't want to be seen as a sex object/trophy wife to some asshole but instead be taken seriously.
 
All this shit talk about mah waifu. Ya'll need to get your heads checked.

Trailer looked good. Gonna see it day one since the Jungle Book was surprisingly decent.
 
Really not keen on them casting Emma Watson for the role. Far too prim, proper, British and not attractive or shapely enough imo. But otherwise it looks good.
 
I hear what people are saying about Watson, I disagree to an extent, but I understand.

Watson is accessibly beautiful. She comes across as very genuine, sweet, and beautiful with just enough "normal" to make her feel like a real person you might know.

But if we're talking someone who is a bombshell, curvy, immediately sexy personality, has to try to look bad, etc. I don't thinks he fits the bill.

Personally, I prefer women like Watson over the latter, but if that's what people think Belle should be I could understand why they don't think she fits.
 
I'm just waiting for my Hunchback of Notre Dame remake


Actually, wait, don't touch that movie. It's fine as it is.
 
Personally, I prefer women like Watson over the latter, but if that's what people think Belle should be I could understand why they don't think she fits.

That's not what Belle should be. Emma has a nice figure, but since when should Belle be treated as a sex object?

She comes across as very genuine, sweet, and beautiful with just enough "normal" to make her feel like a real person you might know.

This is Belle.
 
Really not keen on them casting Emma Watson for the role. Far too prim, proper, British and not attractive or shapely enough imo. But otherwise it looks good.

The sheer, absolute blinding irony of this post given the context of this movie is amazing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom