German-born bounty hunter Dr. King Schultz (Academy Award®-winner Christoph Waltz).
Hans Landa 2.0?
German-born bounty hunter Dr. King Schultz (Academy Award®-winner Christoph Waltz).
Well we do know the role was pretty much tailor-made for Waltz.Hans Landa 2.0?
All I ask is for no fourth wall breaking exposition about useless shit like how to develop film in the 1940s.
Those completely unnecessary sequences really ruined Inglourious Basterds. Were they in the original script, or did the films pacing just not work with a Hugo Stiglitz prison break in the middle of it?
Maybe fourth wall breaking is the wrong term. Anytime you need to a.) use a celebrity voice over out of nowhere, b.) put words on screen with fonts from a different time period or c.) use stock footage from yet another time period of your period film, it hurts suspension of disbelief.Respectfully disagree. It wasn't fourth wall breaking because it was narrative. It wasn't like the main characters looked at the camera and explained the circumstances. And I don't think most movie goers realized film would burn like that. However, the couple running the theatre would be very well aware of it, so one of them explaining to the other how flammable their film was would seem clumsy and unnatural.
Maybe fourth wall breaking is the wrong term. Anytime you need to a.) use a celebrity voice over out of nowhere, b.) put words on screen with fonts from a different time period or c.) use stock footage from yet another time period of your period film, it hurts suspension of disbelief.
Tarantino is stylish, so apparently he gets a pass. But I considered it clumsy
haha, that was my first thought.
or is it... Soul Bass? :>
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-y-g1NTltUg4/TicZMvkvkyI/AAAAAAAAGHM/MmgA8mZyPOs/s1600/30ljuwl.jpgI don't remember the font thing you talked about.
Still, even if the scene wasn't good in your eyes, I can't imagine how it could ruin the entire movie.
Well we do know the role was pretty much tailor-made for Waltz.
That Synopsis is incredible. Do i read the script!?!?
I always liken reading Tarantino scripts as akin to reading the book of a film. You know what's coming but the pleasure is in bringing that script to life; best thing is its by the person who wrote it so their vision isn't distilled at all. It's a very good script, which'll work better on screen that written as it is, so I'm very excited.
I'll be honest, they really need to nail the score for me to be able to get into this movie.
I'll be honest, they really need to nail the score for me to be able to get into this movie.
Hans Landa 2.0?
I'm wondering what accent the Candie Man is going to have - is the beard confirmed?I'm seeing this mainly because it's Leo playing a bad guy in a Taratino movie.
Nope.Hans Landa 2.0?
Is the Foxx hate because the guy's an arrogant asshole (or said to be one. I have no clue what he's like) or is it because people think he's a bad actor? He's not a bad actor at all, he's just the same guy in so many of his movies. Minus Ray.
I have nothing against Foxx, just would've really loved to see Willl Smith in this role.
I'm still angry at Plainview for ruining the movie for himself by reading the script.
I'm still angry at Plainview for ruining the movie for himself by reading the script.
Quite a few people did.
Ya'll are all nuts, people who read the script.
Agreed. Why spoil a QT movie for yourself? We only get one every few years.
I did get the Gravity script though, holding off on that one![]()
Pretty much going to be between this and Killing Them Softly for my MOTY, if both live up to their potential.
What's Killing Them Softly?
This doesn't actually come out until next year in the UK but I'll count it as such, and while I'm very hyped for TDKR the trailers haven't completely sold it to me yet, so it's between this, Prometheus and Cogan's Trade.
Assasination of Jesse James reunion.
Any ideas on when we'll get a trailer for this?
How the hell have we not got any official pics from the shoot? Except for the single one of Waltz.