• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Django Unchained | Hype Thread | QT Goes Western

Status
Not open for further replies.
Watched it today and really enjoyed it. The 3 hours totally flew by, unlike another certain 3 hour flick released recently...

Like some have mentioned, the soundtrack is fantastic.
Tupac during the shootout scene was godlike!

Its obviously the Austin Powers outfit

austinpowersinternatiz1osk.jpg

My girlfriend thought I was crazy when I said he was wearing an Austin Powers outfit! Fucking hilarious.

EskimoJoe
Member
(Today, 05:02 PM)

:lol
 
I felt like it was too long, but I didn't get that "multiple ending" feel from it. It just continued on past a point where I thought it was going to end, and I enjoyed it because it wrapped things up,
and Stephen was the actual overseer of the plantation.

I didn't feel that it was too long, but it definitely has an unusual structure and pace, so I can see why the whole "multiple endings" thing gets mentioned. It's like the Antebellum South version of Okami. Django Unchained 2 and 3 are both already in this movie.


Anyway, one thing I don't think I've seen mentioned anywhere is how
a squib pops right into Jamie's face after he kills the guy that killed Shultz, and he actually wipes the blood off his face a split second before taking a shot at someone else.
Just a great little moment that could only happen using practical effects.
The Chow Yun Fat dive through the door immediately after that was badass too
 
Was I the only one who noticed that the actor who got killed in the beginning was Candies personal guard at Candy Land?

Because what the fuck was that about? I thought there was some odd "im that dudes twin" shit going on.
 
Was I the only one who noticed that the actor who got killed in the beginning was Candies personal guard at Candy Land?

Because what the fuck was that about? I thought there was some odd "im that dudes twin" shit going on.

One thing that was a funny nod to the low budget spaghetti westerns was having James Remar play two roles. I LOL'd when he was gunned down in the first 5 minutes, only to reappear half an hour later. Made me think of the same actor playing two different villains in A Fistful of Dollars and For A Few Dollars More.

.
 
It didn't really come off that way to me. I thought there was going to be some odd "but he was never dead" shit going on or something.

And the fact that the characters never acknowledged it in anyway was just bizarre.
 
It didn't really come off that way to me. I thought there was going to be some odd "but he was never dead" shit going on or something.

And the fact that the characters never acknowledged it in anyway was just bizarre.

?

They didn't acknowledge it because they were two different characters, like I just said. It was definitely an intentional nod to spaghetti westerns, Leone's in particular.
 
So I was listening to the Giantbombcast and Ryan was talking about Django and mentioned that in the scene
where Fox is hanging upside down about to get his nuts chopped off, he saw
everything. Fox's everything. Full cock+balls.
I don't remember seeing that and I think I would have. Did I watch a censored version of the film?
 
Frankly, I was really surprised that it wasn't censored or anything; I thought that was instant NC-17?

i remember watching some documentary on movie ratings and stuff and I think it was Robert Rodriguez who was talking about how the rating board members love Quentin so he can convince them to let him get away with a lil extra
 
Was going to ask you guys where that blood on Leo's hand came from but then some googling showed me he cut it during filming and just kept going. Awesome.
 
Was going to ask you guys where that blood on Leo's hand came from but then some googling showed me he cut it during filming and just kept going. Awesome.

yeah, i think he shatters a glass when he slams his hand down on the table.
...

anyway, this is a great movie. ive seen it twice this week.

and listening to the soundtrack just reminds me of all the incredibly rad scenes in it.

like riding up to the candie plantation and sam jackson coming outside to greet them..

or django facing the brittle brothers.

or any other song.
 
I didn't feel that it was too long, but it definitely has an unusual structure and pace, so I can see why the whole "multiple endings" thing gets mentioned. It's like the Antebellum South version of Okami. Django Unchained 2 and 3 are both already in this movie.

Anyway, one thing I don't think I've seen mentioned anywhere is how
a squib pops right into Jamie's face after he kills the guy that killed Shultz, and he actually wipes the blood off his face a split second before taking a shot at someone else.
Just a great little moment that could only happen using practical effects.
The Chow Yun Fat dive through the door immediately after that was badass too

Okami's length is a good analogy; that game had like three fights that felt like final boss battles, but there was considerably more game after each one, which was more than welcome. Realizing there was a lot after the
Candy Land shootout
was a pleasant surprise since I wasn't paying attention to the time.

Non-CG almost always trumps CG when it comes to action, at least for me.
That shootout was made even better because Schultz, who's always been around to help, gets killed and Django is all by himself. Such a good action scene because of the build-up, the action itself and that it was the first shootout, one no one had prepared for. There was a genuine sense of danger there which makes the somewhat by-the-book positive ending feel well-deserved; the audience knows Tarantino and knows no one is safe, so it's got good tension throughout.

or any other song.

Or Django and Schultz training and getting bounties in the mountains
 
slashfilm: ‘Django Unchained’ Trivia: Sacha Baron Cohen’s Excised Role; Walton Goggins Cut Scenes; Zoe Bell’s Secret

(Spoilers)

First up let’s go to Sacha Baron Cohen, who explained his cut role to Deadline, saying that conflicts with finishing The Dictator and having a bigger role in Les Miserables meant that he couldn’t show up for Tarantino:

I was editing ‘The Dictator’ and we were very close to release and Paramount wouldn’t push the date. And then I knew I’d have to jump straight from there into ‘Les Mis[erables]‘ and it basically became a choice of either pulling out of ‘Les Mis’ or pulling out of ‘Django.’ I’m sure ‘Django’ is an incredible movie, but it was essentially one scene.​

That one scene is a big part of the backstory for Django’s wife Broomhilda, and something that was cut altogether when Cohen backed out. The character is a young, naive guy who is given Broomhilda as a compantion by his father. But an ill-fated trip to Calvin Candie’s gambling den leaves Scotty dead and the woman in the hands of Candie, thereby setting up the endgame conflict we see in the film.

In an interview with The Playlist, Walton Goggins talks about a couple of his cut scenes, which aren’t necessarily things you can find in the original script, as Goggin’s character is an amalgamation of two guys from the original draft: Billy Crash (the actor’s original role) and Ace Woody, who was first meant to be played by Kevin Costner, then Kurt Russell, and who was folded into Goggins’ part when those two actors both passed.

There was a big scene between Leonardo and I that really cemented their relationship and you really saw how the inner workings of the plantation were conducted. And we had long conversations between Billy Crash and Sam Jackson’s character and how they both had a vested interest in keeping the status quo because it was the only way they would retain their power.​

Finally, the best bit to come to light has to do with a very minor character. In a long Vanity Fair profile about costume designer Sharen Davis and her work on the film, there’s a great tidbit about one character: the bandanna-masked character played silently by Zoe Bell in the film. (Thanks to Renn Brown for the heads-up on that interview.) The character isn’t in the script, as I recall, but she’s got more of a backstory than we see in the movie.

Vanity Fair says,

That leaves some unexplained characters, like that of the beautiful lady outlaw whose face is half-covered throughout the film. (The idea there, says Davis, is that the character would drop the bandana to reveal an absent jaw.)

Did they ever shoot that reveal? Right now we don’t know. Circling back around to Goggins, in that same interview he mentioned a bit about Bell, too:

Yeah, you don’t really get anything from her character. But she’s lethal. And you know, I should probably just stick to myself and my character.​
 
While I was really satisfied with the movie and appreciate wanting to see more of the characters in the film rather than being tired of them by the end, this could've gotten the "Vol. 1/Vol. 2" treatment. The above almost confirms that, and I still want to see Django and Schultz's winter in the mountains.
 
...mentioned that in the scene
where Fox is hanging upside down about to get his nuts chopped off, he saw everything. Fox's everything. Full cock+balls.
I don't remember seeing that and I think I would have. Did I watch a censored version of the film?

ya, you could see fake penis. pretty sure it was fake. it looked way off color, and, well it just looked way fake.
 
So I was listening to the Giantbombcast and Ryan was talking about Django and mentioned that in the scene
where Fox is hanging upside down about to get his nuts chopped off, he saw
everything. Fox's everything. Full cock+balls.
I don't remember seeing that and I think I would have. Did I watch a censored version of the film?

I noticed the same thing. I never saw that at all.
 
I don't understand how anybody missed it...



Definitely more than just the sack.

I thought at first it was some garment that he was wearing and everybody I saw it with had that initial thought as well. Most of my group was also saying that the color was strange. I guess I can kinda see the strangeness in the color.
 
http://blogs.suntimes.com/scanners/2013/01/unchain_my_heart_and_set_me_fr.html

At two hours and 45 minutes, "Django Unchained" is a long movie, and feels even longer. But I suspect it's one of those pictures that would seem much shorter and faster-moving if certain missing scenes were restored. Although this is by nature a quest movie, a road movie, with a picaresque, episodic structure, the set-pieces (such as they are) don't build suspense and the overall narrative feels haphazard and dramatically slack -- which is really uncharacteristic of the usually energetic and focused Tarantino. The movie really feels unfinished -- like a hastily thrown-together work print. (I later learned that, despite eight months of production and 18 weeks of post-production, things came right down to the wire and the first screening at the DGA was delayed two days for last-minute mixing tweaks.)

Agreed with nearly every comment he made.
 
i remember watching some documentary on movie ratings and stuff and I think it was Robert Rodriguez who was talking about how the rating board members love Quentin so he can convince them to let him get away with a lil extra
While I'm sure there is some good will for QT, the ratings for stuff like this really all comes down to this being a huge studio movie, which coincidentally pay for the MPAA. Its Indie movies that face serious nc17 struggles.
 
Saw it today. Sooooooo. Fucking. Good. My eyes were glued to the screen the whole time. I do wish they wrapped it up at candies ranch. The last half hour was good but I think it would be a little more tight and concise If it ended there.
 
First half of the movie is pretty awesome. The 2nd half, maaaaaaaaaaaaan, that 2nd half. Easily the worst hour I've ever seen in a Tarantino film.

Great acting job done by all though.
 
Saw it last night that was some Jamie fox yang on display there

Also Sam Jackson and Leo were a fucking mazing .


Christopher waltz stole the show in this movie
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom