They've tracked house cats with cameras on their collars, and the answer to your question is yes. A lot.
We have this cat in the neigborhood, she leaves mice, rats and birds everywhere, but they are pretty much untouched, especially the rodents.
She is well fed and doesn't eat her prey, so she just does it for fun?
If by 'fun' you mean 'keeping their hunting skills sharp' then yes. It's where the term 'cat-and-mouse' came from.
Cats routinely 'play' (catch and release, rinse, repeat) with their prey before finally killing it.
Dogs do it too.
It is a gift for you. They just want to contribute to the household. Just fucking eat the rats and say thank you once in a while for godsakes.
Dogs do it too.
Cats aren't moral actors so it doesn't matter.
Fun is also a human concept. Judging cats using human ideas like entertainment and morality is silly.
Hunting instincts are ingrained in cats.
It's why they go after things like laser pointers.
Do you think any animal can be a moral actor? (serious question)
If fun is a human concept, what about when young mammals play with each other for no apparent reason? We explain it as "play for the purpose of developing social/hunting skills" but it's not like they're doing it with that in mind. Who's to say they're not experiencing "fun"?
I mean, I basically agree with you but only because the human brain is a little more complex. It's just a question of scale, not ability.
No, but apparently they can bully other cats.
It's the only thing I dislike about cats. They don't even eat when they kill. Cruel animals.
Mice run around, cats think they are toys. they kill the mouse, get sad cause their toy broke, so they bring it to the nearest human in hopes that they can fix their toy.
Morality has it's roots in rationality, which isn't based on instinct.
Humans have a frontal lobe that has been identified with long term and rational thinking. Other animals do not have this, so judging animals on human terms is silly.
Human frontal lobes are especially large, but other animals have them too. Like I said, a question of scale.
Do you consider it "morally good" that society generally grieves for its dead? Then what about when elephants do it?
How is grief related to morality? None of these questions make any sense.
Cats aren't moral actors so it doesn't matter.
Fun is also a human concept. Judging cats using human ideas like entertainment and morality is silly.
Basically this.
It's not for "fun" in the same way as a person hunting for sport.
It would be like if you just had a reflex when you saw something small moving quickly around you to go after it.