Ok forget that quote then. Let's use someone else.
This is the same guy you were defending and quoting last week:
[/URL]
This. The hardware is far from mature. I love VR, but it seems 5 years ahead of its time.VR doesn't need saving. It needs time, more affordability and better titles over a period time.
Or you can just use the original quote from the source instead of trying to justify console wars.
Yes all those AAA 1st party don't vr games will save vr.. oh waitSony will, Apple doesn't even have a basic gaming library for their devices now. They sure as hell won't with their VR.
Lol, ain’t gonna happen. That’s like saying movies will replace books. Or like saying touchscreen games on phones will replace controllers—- Except even more unlikely.VR is doing fine, it doesn't need saving. It will continue to grow over time, until it eventually puts flatscreen gaming in the grave. The real question is, what will save flatscreen gaming when that happens?
Nah, I like the one you were defending tooth and nail in this case. Works perfectly.
Gaming will not be prominently featured. It's apple.
I want to see what they do put forth as the prime application. If they manage to do that thing they do it will mean something or other for vr in general.
Reports are that there is no killer app, so no, end of story
As a fellow older gamer then you'll remember being blown away when the PS1 came out and the whole Polygon revolution with Ridge Racer, RE1, Tomb Raider etc, sticking on the PSVR2 and simply being in the menu screen on Horizon puts a massive smile on my face and takes me right back to those days when games just blew you away, there's nothing outside of VR that does that, no matter how good looking the game is on a TV it just cannot compete to being inside the game, it never grows old and if you can afford the punt I'd do it regardless of how you think the platform will turn out, the thing could die tomorrow and I wouldn't care as you just can't get the type of experiences that VR bringsIt's just they are already talking about cutting the price of the thing. I want to buy a psvr2. I think what they've done with gran turismo and they're partnership with Capcom is awesome. Pavlov, moss, thumper... All look great to me.
I've never tried vr and I'm sold. But I've also never tried vr as an older life long video game player. None of my friends have units and there is no way to try this thing in the wild. I want there to be demo stations.
I'm just concerned that it'll "die" before it has a chance to really grow on ps. Having sales just be through Sony must have some advantage?
Unless he buy a bunch of AAA studios or pay third party AAA devs to make games I don’t see anything changing there. It’ll be Quest again with better display, lighter headset, longer battery life and it’ll have tons of shovelware you mostly play because there is no AAA games to play.Big daddy Zucc will save it with Quest 3
As a fellow older gamer then you'll remember being blown away when the PS1 came out and the whole Polygon revolution with Ridge Racer, RE1, Tomb Raider etc, sticking on the PSVR2 and simply being in the menu screen on Horizon puts a massive smile on my face and takes me right back to those days when games just blew you away, there's nothing outside of VR that does that, no matter how good looking the game is on a TV it just cannot compete to being inside the game, it never grows old and if you can afford the punt I'd do it regardless of how you think the platform will turn out, the thing could die tomorrow and I wouldn't care as you just can't get the type of experiences that VR brings
with a price of $3000 the mass market gamer is not the target, this gamer audience is simply priced out. Apple was not even successful to establish gaming on their notebooks.
The target are most likely companies who think it is cool to have a zoom call in VR. So even IF they sell a million units as planned (which is a big IF), there wont be enough gamers.
Important for VR gaming are the cheaper, "good enough" and easy to use systems targeted to gamers, like the Quest, PSVR2 and similar priced devices. Those are cheap enough to sell larger number of units and those numbers will make it more attractive to develop games for.
There are and will be cooler and more expensive devices, where games will look better, but the number won't be large enough to develop games just for those.
Fate loves irony.VR is doing fine, it doesn't need saving. It will continue to grow over time, until it eventually puts flatscreen gaming in the grave. The real question is, what will save flatscreen gaming when that happens?
The price will kill many people alone.
That too, but their enough Apple fanatics that follow them like a cult to perhaps sell a few million still which could give people a false sense of success
Of course! They're also following in Nvidias footsteps. Remeber folks, the more you buy the more you save!So has Apple saved VR??
I guess op got his answer alright...
Already is.Vr before you know it will be the best way to play games.
Already is.
Resident Evil in VR > RE flat
GT7 VR > GT7 flat
first person shooters in VR > fps flat
Not saying it works for every genre (or that it's been done for every genre), but I can't think of a single game that has both and doesn't have me preferring the VR mode.