Crayon Shinchan said:
The most ridiculous thing is how much the internet has been shitted up by Wii fans chanting 'it prints money' at every opportunity.
That Soul Calibur 4 thread. Not just 1, but a multitude of crazy wii nerds suggesting their waggle stick was good enough for use in a solid fighting game.
Well shit. A sixaxis has a motion sensor; guess we can port Wii Sports over to it and get it working as well!
Wiifans would be demanding Starcraft 2 on the Wii if they even thought they could have an inkling of a chance of suggesting it without been catapulted into the sun.
It's surreal to see Wii fans linking the PS2 with the Wii. Constantly!
Apart from market support at this point in their lifetimes, the two are NOTHING like each other. One is a very traditional console that is on par performance wise as its competitors, and also costs the same as its competitors.
The other has the wonderful casual hooking waggle mechanism, along with last gen hardware performance and a substantially lower price point then the other two. The sense of entitlement... for games that simply don't suit its hook, or are awkward/incompatible with its control scheme, is what's mind boggling.
I see your point, and think certain games are more suited to traditional controllers, but you have to understand, we, on this board, don't get to decide what happens. The mass market does.
There are a lot of people saying, 'once the mainstream realises waggle is a gimmick, they'll get bored of Wii', this isn't going to happen. Simple, and relatively effective, always wins out over complicated in the mainstream. Back in the 80s, on computers, games used keys for controls, and were always
better than joysticks. They were more accurate and more refined, for the hardcore, but they were complicated for most people and lost to the simplistic joystick.
Because the hardcore deems a certain control method essential for a particular game, since it makes it
better to play, doesn't mean shit when it comes to mass market tastes. These consumers are preferring the motion controls of Wii to traditional joypads, because they're simpler, like DS's touch screen. It doesn't even matter if they're worse at some games than joypads, the mass market doesn't care, because as long as its
good enough, they're happy. Gaming just isn't important enough for them.
Even though Wii CoD3 and Marvel UA have
worse controls, according to some hardcore gamers, it hasn't stopped them outselling the PS3 versions. Just because Red Steel is regarded as crap to control, hasn't stopped it being a huge seller.
The hardcore needs to start looking at what's actually happening and realise their own preferences aren't good indictators of mass market tastes, if they want to predict future sales, because so far, their record isn't very impressive.
EDIT-
FlightOfHeaven said:
To everyone that took my post seriously:
Joke Post. Thing is, the very idea that you took it seriously speaks volumes about the views of some of the posters here.
Oh, and to the person that claimed I've never used a Wiimote in my life: I do indeed own a Wii. In fact, I think it's awesome that games like Trauma Center are possible on the Wii.
I had an inkling it was incongruous to the posts I've seen of yours, but I wasn't sure. I think you really need a tag, or to have been here a good while, before 'joke posts' are effective.