victreeb3l
Member
Dogs are cool but cats are way cuter and better
My dog is trained to use pee pads when we aren't home to give it walks. I can leave the house for hours at a time without having to worry. Plus the piss and shit doesn't smell as bad as cats do. My dog is pretty small though, about 17 pounds.
heh, funny cause my dog definitely smells more than my cats (ok, the new kittens aren't as nice smelling but usually cats are not that smelly). Gotta give her a bath every month if you want her to stay smelling nicely. Most cats are no baths required (as I said, my current kittens are a bit smelly for cats).
Dogs are awesome. Cats are also awesome. Having arguments over which is better is quite frankly, fucking childish.
1 extra maybe. I think the total score is still:
Dogs - 5
Cats - 4,502
Cats own the internet because the internet is full of introverted misanthropes that want everyone else to know about the one domesticated animal they relate to rather than the one that's actually capable of love.
Why do so many people attach human emotions to dogs? Capable of love? Really?
I think pugs are their own species.
My pug is 11 and still acts like a crazy puppy a lot of the time.
gave me this little nugget:
AWF is talking about the pee/poo in particular. Cat pee has a specific chemical in it that makes it smell much worse than from dogs.
It's more the people that aren't immediately adored by cats. It's like the DeNiro thing, you have to earn a cats love. Dogs are pack animals, they need a master. Cats don't. They are predators. That being said, cats can have very dog like behavior when they bond with you. Both make great pets. People that exclusively like dogs are typically more the, serve me, entertain me, need me type people. Usually they aren't really capable of viewing animals as peers. They are the same people that fill shelters with dogs that are no longer entertaining or convenient.
Owner: "You're so stupid! Yes you are! Yes you are!"
Dog: "!!!"
What grosses me the fuck out about dogs is how they constantly lick you. Ugh.
I have this one friend who shares food with his dog (lets his dog take a bite, then finishes the rest) and lets the dog lick his MOUTH.
Dogs eat their own shit. You now have dog shit germs inside your mouth and all over your face.
I realize that dog mouths are allegedly cleaner than human mouths, but guess what? That doesn't make them clean, that just means they're a little less disgusting.
Why do so many people attach human emotions to dogs? Capable of love? Really?
I was thinking this. Then I remembered many on this forum argue about which box of circuits is better than another. Suddenly I'm not surprised.Dogs are awesome. Cats are also awesome. Having arguments over which is better is quite frankly, fucking childish.
![]()
There's a lot of dogs with GAF accounts
Dogs eat their own shit.
I mean, cats piss and shit in a sandbox that they dig around in and inevitably step on, and their solution to this is to lick themselves as if that's actually sanitary.
There's a reason pregnant women are told not to handle cat litter... again, the cat litter these things step in.
This is like saying people eat boogers. Yeah, some gross ones do. The vast majority do not. My dog has never tried to eat his own shit.
You make a good point. Still, at least cats have the dignity to not lick their owners on sight like dogs do. The only way I can get my cats to lick my hand is if I put something cats like on it (like catnip) and hold it up to their nose.
Sorry, I worded that incorrectly. I meant that my friend's dog eats its own shit. I've seen it happen.
Cats do give a fuck. You just have to give a fuck about them. At least that's my experience.
Dogs and cats are both great friends.
Cats are such an intellectual enigma that scientists still haven't been able to figure them out. Still remains:Dogs are the superior species
Dogs - 1
Cats - 0
Well a mute and deft person wouldn't have an interior voice either but you can teach them a language and they'll learn to communicate, any other animal won't communicate using the same language as us because they don't have a conscience and brain power, animals have many actions "pre-loaded" hence why I used the computer program as an example.
I very much doubt dogs process words the same way as us, to them hearing the word car and then go inside it doesn't mean they understood the word, it's like hearing a sound of a certain motor and associating that sound with that car and that sound with a truck, it's still a motor sound but we know that the motor sound isn't saying "I'm a Punto" and "I'm a truck", I think this is own they register the words and perhaps even use the same parts of the brain that these studies claim they do.
Cats are such an intellectual enigma that scientists still haven't been able to figure them out. Still remains:
Cats - 1
Dogs - 0
You make a good point. Still, at least cats have the dignity to not lick their owners on sight like dogs do. The only way I can get my cats to lick my hand is if I put something cats like on it (like catnip) and hold it up to their nose.
Cats are better though.
Cats are such an intellectual enigma that scientists still haven't been able to figure them out. Still remains:
Cats - 1
Dogs - 0
It's something that I've never witnessed, specially when it comes to dogs. Most examples here in this thread are of classical conditioning. Perhaps because of domestication those abilities are dormant.
Of course dogs don't understand the definitions of words, but I don't see how associating the sound of "sit" (or "rock" or whatever you want to say) with a particular action is different from understanding the word (at least as it's been learned by the dog). Isn't that how we begin to learn words at a young age? Couldn't a child come to believe that "rock" means to go for a walk if that's how his or her parents used the term?
I had a cat that would lick the shit out of my hands all the time when I pet her.
I was thinking this. Then I remembered many on this forum argue about which box of circuits is better than another. Suddenly I'm not surprised.
Like most of this stuff in small doses a bit of "cats vs dogs" jostling is moderately funny but it quickly becomes very, very dull.
Having once rescued a puppy and kitten from the same home and experienced the little suckers live their lives as the literal best of friends it's indeed a pointless argument.
That said I will admit dogs have one thing on cats: they're a lot more likely to starve themselves than eat you if trapped alone with your dead body. Of course technically this makes cats smarter in staying alive by chowing down on you so maybe it's another draw.
When you train a dog to respond to the command "sit," it's nothing more than conditioning. You can substitute the word sit for some other stimuli - the word "run" or snapping your fingers etc. The dog doesn't understand anything, it's just a conditioned response to a specific stimulus.
cindi, i think a fish probably is most suitable for you if that's what you are looking for in a pet :> bar the occasional cleaning of their aquarium, they are very easy to care for. or turtles, they are low maintenance also, and they are beautiful animals.
plants also are a great alternative to care for. i've started to keep a few indoors potted plants and caring for their well being is a different alternative to having a pet (and one that is also rewarding) (also, they are pretty)
I've got lots of plants and love taking care of them.
Honestly, I'd still consider getting a cat. They are my favorite animal. The big ones that is. I've never had a cat but I've had 5-6 dogs. So my worry is that my (mostly) bad experience with dogs is keeping me away from cat ownership, because I fear I've built up in my head an idealized view of cat ownership. Maybe litter boxes aren't as bad as I think, I don't know.
I think I'll need time before I have another pet, whether cat or fish. I just haven't had good experiences with pets in my life. Either my best buddy (black lab puppy, still my favorite dog breed) dies from heart worms even when I give him his medicine, or it's just fucking boring and dies prematurely (hermit crab), or I have no emotional connection with the animal (last dog, sprung upon me outside of my control and suddenly it was "my" dog because it took a liking to me more than them; forms the basis of my most dog owners are selfish and egotistical idea).
I love the idea of pets. Maybe I haven't met the right pet. Then again, I did, and he went and got heart worms and broke my heart.
try to stop it
ill send agents
![]()
One of my daughters had a cat that would physically insert herself between us and start yeowling if we were having an argument (Teenagers... gotta love 'em... otherwise you might kill 'em)...
Stop fighting! Your son is disappoint!
Yep, dogs are great. And yeah, while they apparently can't separate the tone of words from their meaning, they're wonderfully empathetic.I love doing this. It's not about the words with dogs, just the tone you use. They can tell what emotion you're displaying in an instant.
In the past when my wife's been upset, our dog comes over without making any fuss and just rests her head on her lap. It's the loveliest thing to see that sort of guileless empathy.
A: the only assholeish thing is the childish "preference = better" thing going on (albeit in some cases humourously. Obviously they're equally good pets depending on your preference which is my point. Having a preference is fine, saying your preference is better isn't.Eh.
I'm not sure why people are supposed to like both as pets. This "both are great" is fine but when you try to guilt people into their preferences like that it seems kinda asshole-ish. Honestly, I like both. If I see a friend's dog or a cute dog being walked on the street I'm gonna wanna pet it and baby talk it. I do the same thing with cats. I love animals. But when it comes to having a pet, I just don't think dogs make good pets, at least for what I want out of a pet. I would prefer cats as a pet but even then I'd still be picking up shit from a littler box and making sure I don't breath in the litter so I don't get toxoplasmosis. So honestly, as pets? Probably neither. I'd rather stick with fish, thank you.
Also, that idea that dogs are better as pets because they wouldn't eat you honestly doesn't put any points in their or dog lovers favor. It fully reinforces the idea earlier in this thread that many dog owners just own them for narcissistic reasons. "My dog wouldn't eat me if I died" isn't the most glowing of endorsements and is a little sad. To the point where you want something to validate your existence so much that you'd rather it starve and have common sense. If my pet were with me on a deserted island I'd fucking eat it if I had the chance, and saying that dogs wouldn't eat you just makes them look even more pathetic in the animal kingdom. "Well dogs don't eat you when you die!" Loving animals is cool but when you get to that kind of hubris it's fucking weird and a lot of pet owners weird me out for that reason.
This is the internet where cats rule. Your opinion means very little to our cat godsftfy
Cats are pathetic excuses for pets.
This is the internet where cats rule. Your opinion means very little to our cat gods
We don't understand meowing even. Cats meow at humans but they stop meowing to cats after they get older. Weird huhCats are such an intellectual enigma that scientists still haven't been able to figure them out. Still remains:
Cats - 1
Dogs - 0
Dogs rule the real world. They are actually useful as animals that can help humans find other people, hunt, and assist with movement of disabled. Dogs have been winning with people since we domesticated them. Dogs are literally the first pet ever.cats have had their time
it's our time
our time
down here
Then why the fuck wont my dog listen?!![]()