Vape culture is pure cancer.
Vape culture is pure cancer.
We don't know that, there's still little research which has gone into e-cigs and their effects on health, particularly in the long-term. Who knows, a few years down the line they may be seen to be just as bad as smoking.
Many e-liquid producers are already conscious of this. Here's an old statement from the place I use:
http://www.ecblendflavorshop.com/helpdesk/knowledgebase.php?article=71&suggest=1
I went from smoker to vaper in like september, maybe even august. But quit it all a month ago. Hopefully no harm done... Although Velvet Cloud specifically say![]()
although, unregulated is unregulated, so who knows really.
This right here. Congrats on quitting btw!![]()
pls posts like these (and having ahoge nagisa as an avatar) are cancer. this helps people against cancer
And this is just as dangerous if you inhale passively?
Interesting that this study neglects to point out that diacetyl and acetyl propionyl are present at much higher levels in normal cigarette smoke. The implication is that there's some new risk being introduced by ecigs with regard to these specific compounds that isn't there with traditional smoking, when nothing could be further from the truth.
I see a lot of drive-by "gotcha" posts in this thread from people who seem to be pleased by the release of this report, probably because they're annoyed by douchebags who vape in their face and claim that there are zero risks. Douchebaggery aside- of course there are likely to be risks. There hasn't been nearly enough time to conduct studies on the long-term effects of vaping. With that said, there is no plausible reason yet to be put forth by anyone or any study that would give reason to believe that vaping isn't a considerably safer avenue than smoking cigarettes, this study included.
Vaping is the dumbest thing ever man
That's cool. Using vaping to stop smoking or lower your health risk is fine as fuck, but as you said the douchebaggery that seems to follow vapers is out of control. Vaping in public places just shouldn't be allowed, i'm not a smoker. I dont want that shit in my lungs.
Vaping in public should be as cool as giving nicotine gum to little kids in gumball machines, you just wouldn't do it.
So how much was detected? 1part per billion? Thats a significant detail that is missing, unless its buried in the research paper and conveniently forgotten in the article.
Does this affect people who are breathing it in second hand? My mom is coming for Christmas and we will have a newborn around. Should I tell her not to vape around the kid? She insists that e-cigs are way better than cigarettes, but haven't really done the research so not sure.
Many of my family members used vaping as a means to quit smoking. This fucking sucks.
Vaping is fine, vape culture is the fucking worst. Almost as bad as vegans.
I would not let people vape around my kids and my kids range from 15 months to 16 years old.Does this affect people who are breathing it in second hand? My mom is coming for Christmas and we will have a newborn around. Should I tell her not to vape around the kid? She insists that e-cigs are way better than cigarettes, but haven't really done the research so not sure.
Should have cut him off.I saw a car in front of me the other day that had a bumper sticker reading "Vaping is not a Crime" and I was like, "Yea, badass".
We don't know that, there's still little research which has gone into e-cigs and their effects on health, particularly in the long-term. Who knows, a few years down the line they may be seen to be just as bad as smoking.
I agree. Fuck it, I should just go back to smoking. Thanks!!
Or quit. Obviously it's not as easy as it sounds but it seems like some people use e-cigs as an excuse to not try quitting altogether.
What about marijuana?
Or some people (like me) spend 20 years doing patches, gum, and cold turkey over and over again and finally find the one thing that works for them, but hey, maybe I'm just some lazy asshole.
Not just that, they detected levels similar to those observed in the e-cigs in one of 7 blanks (ie no e-cig present) and just went with it and did a background subtract rather than trying to figure out where it came from and repeating the analysis.The study is kind of frustrating. They tell us how much diacetyl they found (just from eyeballing the chart, mostly 5-10 μg per e-cig, with "Peach Schnapps" flavor being a huge outlier), and what the exposure limits are for workplaces (.005 ppm for an 8-hour shift, if I'm reading the chart correctly), but they don't bother converting between the two to give us some idea of what their numbers actually mean. Since they spend a paragraph or two arguing that standards should be stricter for public recreational use than for occupational exposure, I assume the exposure from e-cigs is below the exposure limits for workplaces. But it'd be nice if they'd let us know. As is it feels like they're burying it.
Replacing one addiction with another less harmful addiction isn't really "quitting" anything...
I spent 20 years doing the same thing. You want to know the thing that finally worked? I stopped making excuses for myself. No offence intended. That's how it happened.Or some people (like me) spend 20 years doing patches, gum, and cold turkey over and over again and finally find the one thing that works for them, but hey, maybe I'm just some lazy asshole.