What a game, got completely buried in the series when it had some of the best handling and graphics in any game at the time. HP2 that came out later was step down in every way.Need For Speed: Porsche Unleashed PC, 2000
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Early 3D games that still look good
- Thread starter Dragmire
- Start date
Jack The Nipper
Banned
Daytona is the best example of this every time
Stunt race looks great and some of the things control well and I'd like to see something just like this as long as the tracks were good and good control
personally love the way wave race looks
Stunt race looks great and some of the things control well and I'd like to see something just like this as long as the tracks were good and good control
personally love the way wave race looks
Most definitely. This was the first time I was truly floored looking at a PS1 game. The shading was incredible.
Also, my vote for VF2 on the Saturn. 640x480 and 60 fps, it was magical and still os to this day.
We're talking about PS1/N64 era?
Silent Hill 1, the gritty low-res look actually adds a lot to the game.
-4.jpg)
This looks even better with scanlines enabled on an emu in my opinion. It helps hide the texture jitter a lot.
soxinthebox
Member
I've only played the GCN version but I could never figure out wtf that model was supposed to be. Never really impressed me TBH.
If dreamcast games still count as early, PSO has to be up there it is a technical marvel given the time it came out.
Dark falz is one of the biggest bosses I can think of from the early 2000s.
Porsche Challenge on the PS1 was quite a looker if I remember rightly, was 97 though so not even 20 years old yet...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFA324I_1ws
Man I think I missed out owning a n64 that gen. The textures are so much better...
DownGrader
Member
Probably a given but I think OoT still holds up.
Only in stills IMO. The framerate and the dark nature of some dungeons and houses does not do this game justice.
I just played... ehm, tried to play it on GameCube few weeks ago.
Trust me, you are.
VF3 occupies this weird space where I view it as "early" in terms of when it was released, but not at all in terms of 3D technology.
phant0m
Member
Savage.
baudelinog
Member
Porsche Challenge on the PS1 was quite a looker if I remember rightly, was 97 though so not even 20 years old yet...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFA324I_1ws
Amazing one!
The original Spyro trilogy looked great and still holds up really well today .
![37595-Spyro_the_Dragon_3_-_Year_of_the_Dragon_[NTSC-U]-3.jpg](http://199.101.98.242/media/images/37595-Spyro_the_Dragon_3_-_Year_of_the_Dragon_[NTSC-U]-3.jpg)
![37594-Spyro_the_Dragon_2_-_Ripto's_Rage_[NTSC-U]-2.jpg](http://199.101.98.242/media/images/37594-Spyro_the_Dragon_2_-_Ripto's_Rage_[NTSC-U]-2.jpg)
They might a bit sparse on how much is in the levels, but they have some of the best colors of the PS1 era and give off such a 'mystical' feel that makes them look timeless.
Insomniac knew how to flex the PS1 well, and that shows with their Spyro titles.
.
They might a bit sparse on how much is in the levels, but they have some of the best colors of the PS1 era and give off such a 'mystical' feel that makes them look timeless
. Insomniac knew how to flex the PS1 well, and that shows with their Spyro titles
.IronicSonic
Member
You aren't
Saturn's Sega Rally looks godly and plays very well today
Yeah. I feel in a similar way. All merits to AM2 for that incredible tech achievements but when we talk about early 3D games, I consider Virtua Fighter 2 still is the best example to talk about
Jack The Nipper
Banned
spyro looks great and controls a lot better than most games of that time
Randomly Nameless
Member
It's been said but Mega Man Legends has a timeless quality to its art despite being fairly early.
Sonic 2's bonus level still looks awesome. Not sure if that's real time 3d though.
That wasn't, but Sonic 3D Blast on Saturn had the same Special Stage style, in real 3D:
Yea, I agree that VF2 -> VF3 is a bigger jump than VF1 -> VF2. In fact, I personally consider VF3 the single largest graphical jump ever, relative to anything existing prior to it. My post wasn't intended to make VF3's accomplishments appear less significant. Quite the opposite actually.
It's just that to me VF3 was so ridiculously ahead of its time that it kinda crossed the line on what I'd consider "early 3D", even if nothing else at the time was at the same point. When I look back at Model 2 games, I see games that are aesthetically pleasing in spite of the limitations placed upon them. When I look at VF3, I see the first game where the graphics are sufficient to convincingly portray what they are supposed to be. Leather looks like leather... metal looks like metal etc. The characters and stages look like people and places, rather than collections of geometry. VF3 is basically intermediate 3D transported back into the past by a few years in my eyes. The year matches up, but the tech doesn't.... which is pretty amazing. VF3 kinda is the line imo. There's pre and post VF3.
kamineko
Does his best thinking in the flying car
Technology-wise, only pseudo 3d. But stereoscopic 3d presentation?
3d World Runner has got you covered.
Had a regular, non-3d mode that was easier on the eyes without glasses
3d World Runner has got you covered.
Had a regular, non-3d mode that was easier on the eyes without glasses
Tobal 2 (and No. 1, of course)
You can't really appreciate T2 without looking at it in motion. The smooth animation plus the use of gourad shading on the characters results in something that flows extraordinarily well.
And it could've been the first game to use motion capture:
mobilesworking
Member
All day.
Blue, blue skies I see.
WhiskeyKnight
Member
You kids are crazy with what you consider "early."
I think some of the sprite-based Build Engine stuff still holds up well. It definitely looks better now than the original Quake and other 3D games of the time. Some people consider it "2.5D" or whatever, but you're still exploring a fully 3D space...so it counts dammit!
Duke Nukem 3D, January 1996
I think some of the sprite-based Build Engine stuff still holds up well. It definitely looks better now than the original Quake and other 3D games of the time. Some people consider it "2.5D" or whatever, but you're still exploring a fully 3D space...so it counts dammit!
Duke Nukem 3D, January 1996
The Lamonster
Member
This reminds me of early Halo footage.i always thought this game looked cool, but it had a max res of 512 x 384 and was pretty blocky. not a super representative image.
still looks dope though!
KillerMan91
Member
PS1 era Spyros still look charming.
TheSlySoul
Member
Non-polygons: Super Mario 64
Polygons: Tempest
Polygons: Tempest
Yeah I played MGS1 like a month ago and it still looks good. I mean, obviously it's a bit lo-fi, but it's aesthetically attractive. Great texture work and overall art direction.
The Albatross
Member
Always thought that 'Croc' for the Playstation looked very good. But I can never tell if a screen is legit or an emulator these days.
Wait, what?
SimpleCRIPPLE
Member
Cybersled and Virtual On, respectively:
Came for Virtual On, found Virtual On.
Well done.
MrCunningham
Member
You kids are crazy with what you consider "early."
I think some of the sprite-based Build Engine stuff still holds up well. It definitely looks better now than the original Quake and other 3D games of the time. Some people consider it "2.5D" or whatever, but you're still exploring a fully 3D space...so it counts dammit!
Duke Nukem 3D, January 1996
That's not really an accurate representation of what Duke 3D looked like in 1996 though. The above image is from the Eduke 32 port and has advanced OpenGL lighting that wasn't in the original game. This is much closer to what it really looked like:
Though the above was taken from DOSbox on my PC. Even this is running in 800x600 VESA SVGA and would've been considered ultra settings. Most people were lucky to play this game at 320x400 or even 640x480 on their PC's in 1996.
We're talking about PS1/N64 era?
Silent Hill 1, the gritty low-res look actually adds a lot to the game.
Silent Hill 1-3 still look amazing to me. 2 and 3 especially. Team Silent were fucking PS2 wizards.
1996
never stop posting virtua fighter gifs
Team Alucard
Banned
Released in 2003 and had better looking character models than a lot of gen 7 games.
PapaEmeritus
Member
I think Croc still looks sharp-
PapaEmeritus
Member
Always thought that 'Croc' for the Playstation looked very good. But I can never tell if a screen is legit or an emulator these days.
My man, haha, beat me to it
Spieler Eins
Member
We're talking about PS1/N64 era?
Silent Hill 1, the gritty low-res look actually adds a lot to the game.
This. Still an extremely scary game.
I would have said Conker's Bad Fury Day, but even though that came out on an old console, it was way late into its life.
AndrewDean84xX
Banned
It's threads like this why I love coming to GAF.
0.1.1.2.3.5.8.13.21.34.55
Banned
1997
Motorhead was excellent. It had 30/60fps decided by number of AI too.
Worldshaker
Member
Both Mystical Ninja games on the N64 still look great today IMO.
So many cleaned up emulator shots that look nothing like the games running on original hardware...
Most of the games that I think still hold up from the PS1/N64 era are games that cheated by combining polygons and sprites. That definitely wasn't the best looking era in gaming history.
Also, posting Dreamcast and Gamecube games as early 3D games is sort of like calling Grand Theft Auto 5 an early HD game.
Most of the games that I think still hold up from the PS1/N64 era are games that cheated by combining polygons and sprites. That definitely wasn't the best looking era in gaming history.
Also, posting Dreamcast and Gamecube games as early 3D games is sort of like calling Grand Theft Auto 5 an early HD game.