• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Echochrome Editor

It's not "the PC version". The engine was part of a thesis of a University student, if I'm not wrong. The concept and engine, and probably the producer, got hired or licensed by Sony for Echochrome. Phil Harrison has talked about a USER GENERATED CONTENT component of Echochrome, which will likely involve the said editor you are seeing in the video.

Not "deceiving", which is certainly a useful word by anti-Sony campers. Just that the words involved by these gaming sites are poorly chosen and poorly researched by the various gaming journalists.
 
arias said:
It's not "the PC version". The engine was part of a thesis of a University student, if I'm not wrong. The concept and engine, and probably the producer, got hired or licensed by Sony for Echochrome. Phil Harrison has talked about a USER GENERATED CONTENT component of Echochrome, which will likely involve the said editor you are seeing in the video.

Not "deceiving", which is certainly a useful word by anti-Sony campers. Just that the words involved by these gaming sites are poorly chosen and poorly researched by the various gaming journalists.
so it's unintentionally deceiving?
 
arias said:
It's not "the PC version". The engine was part of a thesis of a University student, if I'm not wrong. The concept and engine, and probably the producer, got hired or licensed by Sony for Echochrome. Phil Harrison has talked about a USER GENERATED CONTENT component of Echochrome, which will likely involve the said editor you are seeing in the video.

Not "deceiving", which is certainly a useful word by anti-Sony campers. Just that the words involved by these gaming sites are poorly chosen and poorly researched by the various gaming journalists.


0_o

Shit ... did NOT know that!!!



Some more Game 3.0!!!!!!
 
The Faceless Master said:
so it's unintentionally deceiving?

What an oxymoron.

For me to have deceived you, there must have been intention. That's just how the use of the word goes.



I'm serious about the UGC (user generated content) part though. This along with Little Big Planet are coming together nicely..
 
Awesome.

I'd probally create some sucky levels myself, maybe insert a penis gag or two and call it a day.

Everyone else's efforts should provide hours more fun however.
 
arias said:
What an oxymoron.

For me to have deceived you, there must have been intention. That's just how the use of the word goes.

Not always. My looks are deceiving, but that hardly means that I'm maintaining this godly human body for the purpose of throwing you off track ;) A simple word addition to the title could've cleared up any confusion for the hard of reading. I await Echochrome with open loins.
 
vilmer_ said:
Not always. My looks are deceiving, but that hardly means that I'm maintaining this godly human body for the purpose of throwing you off track ;) I await Echochrome with open loins.

That's another use of the word.

It's not as if the "watch" I'm wearing on my hand is actually "watching" me.
 
arias said:
That's another use of the word.

It's not as if the "watch" I'm wearing on my hand is actually "watching" me.

A simple change to the title of the video will clear up any misconceptions and not deceive a large number of users. Maybe the usage of deceive is different here in Canada.
 
vilmer_ said:
A simple change to the title of the video will clear up any misconceptions and not deceive a large number of users. Maybe the usage of deceive is different here in Canada.

Well, as a fellow Canadian-resident, I shall be generous enough to offer you a new, more appropriate word - "mislead".

But I do agree with your sentiment.
 
arias said:
Well, as a fellow Canadian-resident, I shall be generous enough to offer you a new, more appropriate word - "mislead".

But I do agree with your sentiment.

Might as well throw in the word "confuse" while we're at it. I'm sure we can both have a firm grasp on this term: High five, fellow Canuck :D
 
Top Bottom