Maybe he created Anakin knowing that he'd eventually kill Palpatine.
If Snoke is Plag and Plag created Anakin long after his "death" why the hell is Plag dealing with Kylo instead of making someone else?
Maybe he created Anakin knowing that he'd eventually kill Palpatine.
If Snoke is Plag and Plag created Anakin long after his "death" why the hell is Plag dealing with Kylo instead of making someone else?
Obi-Wan learned from Qui-gon was well. And I just imagine since Anakin is the force balancer he can do it automatically? Palpatine said that Vader would become more powerful than both himself and Yoda so maybe that has a part to do with it? Anakin was the chosen and he was born with no father, of the force basically so maybe he can cheat.
He did but that show isn't canon lol, the last episode was an awesome lead up to Revenge of the Sith though.
You definitely should! The first season is a bit slow but it starts to pick up and it only gets better with every new season. I'd argue that Clone Wars is better than all 3 prequel movies tbh.
Currently have one of my best friends watching Clone Wars and he's loving it and the best part is that he's not even a Star Wars fan.
Snoke is the big disappointment of the movie.
Too much Caesar and Golem in him with over acting.
Lupita Nyong (who has less mocap experience than Andy Serkis) delivered a better believable performance that the ''older Andy Serkis.
which exposes Serkis for the hack that he is.
Serkis ruined Snoke. Snoke is off to an awful start and will be the weak link the new Star Wars movies.
She doesn't say "Isn't that Sn...?" she says "Is that s...?" but it sounds more like stutter/stop. Doesn't really seal anything for me, but it is absolutely an awkward moment for the panel. NO ONE wants to answer it, Daisy speaks (the others seem even a little surprised that she speaks up), then JJ/Kasdan awkwardly fumble through a "no".
Perhaps he renounced the Sith after realizing that philosophy resulted in his near death. And who knows how long this regeneration took to accomplish. He could have been in a friggin cocoon for 40 years.It doesn't make any sense to me at all. Sith are about hatred, revenge, etc. So why would Plagueis sit around while Palpatine rules the galaxy and ignore him completely instead of going to fuck him up? Then wait 10 years after his death to show him self again with a completely new identity?
Well, of course he would lie.ANdy Serkis is a hack now.
Holy fucj neogaf.
ANdy Serkis is a hack now.
Holy fucj neogaf.
I'm not going that far, but I didn't enjoy the performance in retrospect. Love Serkis' Gollum, though.
More like the pieces are being forced to fit.
i just got around to watching TFA (really wanted to beat the crowds) so forgive the dumb conjecture.... but if Plagueis is at play in this trilogy, i have a theory about it relating to Rey's "parentage"...
being Luke or Leia's daughter seems a little too on the nose, so i'm more or less ruling it out. she obviously comes from some Force-rich lineage. maybe she's, in a sense, Anakin's sister. or rather from the same "source" Plagueis created Anakin from
i'm skeptical the trilogy will have anything to do with Plagueis at all, since the entire point of the movie seemed to be a Fuck You to the prequels. but assuming Snoke factors into the origins of Anakin and a lot of the unseen stuff in both trilogies, to me it points to Rey being the "second coming"... which also makes sense when you consider the OT originally planned for Luke having a twin sister somewhere far off in another galaxy, which is what the sequel trilogy was supposed to be about. Rey seems to be Kasdan retrofitting that idea
I guess Rey could be Plagueis' next attempt to "create life" somehow?
i just got around to watching TFA (really wanted to beat the crowds) so forgive the dumb conjecture.... but if Plagueis is at play in this trilogy, i have a theory about it relating to Rey's "parentage"...
being Luke or Leia's daughter seems a little too on the nose, so i'm more or less ruling it out. she obviously comes from some Force-rich lineage. maybe she's, in a sense, Anakin's sister. or rather from the same "source" Plagueis created Anakin from
i'm skeptical the trilogy will have anything to do with Plagueis at all, since the entire point of the movie seemed to be a Fuck You to the prequels. but assuming Snoke factors into the origins of Anakin and a lot of the unseen stuff in both trilogies, to me it points to Rey being the "second coming"... which also makes sense when you consider the OT originally planned for Luke having a twin sister somewhere far off in another galaxy, which is what the sequel trilogy was supposed to be about. Rey seems to be Kasdan retrofitting that idea
I can't think of a single role Serkis has played were he has hammed anything at all.
His actual presence in the Episode 3 story failed because his entire point (the birth of Anakin) flew straight over the heads of almost the entire audience.
Sure, if you assume that he has to be someone we already know which he doesn't at all. I think too many people are ignoring that the very real possibility that he's just a new character and we're all overthinking this. It's the simplest explanation that requires no assumptions and has no real points of argument against it.Most likely Plagueis. All the pieces fit.
And in all honesty the bigger question iswho Rey is related to.
I thinkbeing Luke's daughter is too easy. IMO she'll be related to Obi-Wan.
Palpatine speaks specifically about the irony of having power over life but being unable to save your own. It cannot be him, because he must be dead for those words to have any meaning. I don't buy that a sith master that becomes the Emperor just doesn't realise the master he murdered is still hanging around. I think the plagious theory is well off the mark, and only exists because it's a name we have to throw around. I bet my avatar and my pride that all the people saying this are dead wrong.
Palpatine speaks specifically about the irony of having power over life but being unable to save your own. It cannot be him, because he must be dead for those words to have any meaning.
This is blatantly wrong. Unreliable narrators is a standard and well-liked trope in storytelling, and Palpatine is definitely an unreliable narrator in that context. Why would he know that Plagueis survived, particularly if it took years and years for the guy to heal back up to full strength and he deliberately hid? Not to mention Palpatine's pride, which would cloud his judgment and make him dismiss any signs that his old master may yet live.
You're presenting a rather strange approach to plot and character creation in your argument. Most authors don't follow such unusual rules when telling their stories.
This is blatantly wrong. Unreliable narrators is a standard and well-liked trope in storytelling, and Palpatine is definitely an unreliable narrator in that context. Why would he know that Plagueis survived, particularly if it took years and years for the guy to heal back up to full strength and he deliberately hid? Not to mention Palpatine's pride, which would cloud his judgment and make him dismiss any signs that his old master may yet live.
You're presenting a rather strange approach to plot and character creation in your argument. Most authors don't follow such unusual rules when telling their stories.
I think having Plagueis as Snoke would be bad because it'd be too convoluted, no one really remembers Plagueis outside internet nerds and it would reference a passing sentence in an awful trilogy. this said, if he's not Plagueis I haven't got the slight idea on who he might be if he's something we're supposed to know. I guess I'll stick for the ride and discover it with the next movies.
edit: also, 'Plagueis' is a super cringy name like Sidious. It's like Darth Reallynasty. not that 'Snoke' is a cool name anyway.
This is blatantly wrong. Unreliable narrators is a standard and well-liked trope in storytelling, and Palpatine is definitely an unreliable narrator in that context. Why would he know that Plagueis survived, particularly if it took years and years for the guy to heal back up to full strength and he deliberately hid? Not to mention Palpatine's pride, which would cloud his judgment and make him dismiss any signs that his old master may yet live.
You're presenting a rather strange approach to plot and character creation in your argument. Most authors don't follow such unusual rules when telling their stories.
You disregard that he was murdered in his sleep. It's safe to assume Palpatine would have checked when betraying his own master to death no? To assume otherwise is to assume palpatines character was an incompetent fool. I'd also add that Palpatine could sense peoples lives entire star systems away. He knew Anakin was in trouble and saved him from another star system, but he doesn't know his old master -that he killed - is alive? For it to be Plagious, it would have to shit on everything we know and assume about Palpatine, ruining his character in the process. Not going to happen.
Snoke is new, or someone else entirely. It cannot be Palpatines master, because he would know he was alive. Tropes have little to do with it, there are tropes for everything, and that position could be represented from any viewpoint.
Only a Jedi can become a Force Ghost.Do we know how Plagious is able to cheat death? Perhaps he was dead, for all intents and purposes, but was revived at a later date. Then Palpatine would believe he had killed his master, because he was dead when he checked.
Plus, if he is able to bring himself back from the dead, it's not completely unreasonable to assume he had found some way to hide his "life signature" from anyone who might want to find him.
Do we know how Plagious is able to cheat death? Perhaps he was dead, for all intents and purposes, but was revived at a later date. Then Palpatine would believe he had killed his master, because he was dead when he checked.
Plus, if he is able to bring himself back from the dead, it's not completely unreasonable to assume he had found some way to hide his "life signature" from anyone who might want to find him.
Honestly, that Comic-Con video has driven me to believe that Snoke is Darth Plagueis.
After seeing the film, I would have given about a 10% chance it was him. Then after reading a few fan theories with some very circumstantial evidence I gave about a 25% chance it was him. After Daisy's slip-up and the ensuing reaction of the panel, I think it's about 80% likely.
What if, and I know this is crazy but just bare with me for a second, what if Snoke is really a whole new character?
What if, and I know this is crazy but just bare with me for a second, what if Snoke is really a whole new character?
Do we know how Plagious is able to cheat death? Perhaps he was dead, for all intents and purposes, but was revived at a later date. Then Palpatine would believe he had killed his master, because he was dead when he checked.
Plus, if he is able to bring himself back from the dead, it's not completely unreasonable to assume he had found some way to hide his "life signature" from anyone who might want to find him.
Don't be silly. Why wouldn't he be a character briefly mentioned in one of the prequels who the big bad of the entire saga supposedly failed to kill and that one of the writers of this film didn't even know?
Jar Jar with a microphone
Correct
Who didn't know?
IIRC Kasdan.
You disregard that he was murdered in his sleep.
a) He wasn't taught everything as he said to Anakin.
Sure, if you assume that he has to be someone we already know which he doesn't at all. I think too many people are ignoring that the very real possibility that he's just a new character and we're all overthinking this. It's the simplest explanation that requires no assumptions and has no real points of argument against it.
Palpatine speaks specifically about the irony of having power over life but being unable to save your own. It cannot be him, because he must be dead for those words to have any meaning. I don't buy that a sith master that becomes the Emperor just doesn't realise the master he murdered is still hanging around. I think the plagious theory is well off the mark, and only exists because it's a name we have to throw around. I bet my avatar and my pride that all the people saying this are dead wrong.