Look at what blu-ray players cost when they released, and look at what they cost now.
People really need to stop perpetuating this "one console future = one console maker," "omg no competition" bastardization of the One Console Future ideal. It should work the same way as video formats; One standard industry format that many companies could manufacture hardware for. There would be more, and far more direct, competition. Not less.
I don't pay $700 for a blu ray player today... and under the model I listed there would still be hardware competition and they would still try and drive the price down, much like blu-ray players and dvd players work. Yes, the initial cost of devices would be high, but there would definitely be a race to the bottom so to speak, much more so than this generation where price drops have been rare and insignificant.
would prefer google to handle the OS or else it kinda just becomes a microsoft PC, why not get a "computer" then?
honestly though isn't it funny that all nintendo is good for are their old franchises...
and don't we have a "One" console? it's called Apple, where crowd sourcing is the new first-party.
I do think down the line though consoles, tvs, and computers will all be 1 machine. with multiple displays around your house.
blu-ray player prices were driven down by competition with hd-dvd players.
you want to pretend competition with HD-DVD had no effect on Blu-Ray hardware prices? of course prices didn't spike through the roof after HD-DVD failed. it would have angered consumers.Yes, and that's why Blu-Ray prices went through the roof when HD-DVD went away.
Wait, that's not what happened at all. The prices continued the same downward trend because of the competition between manufacturers.
A games console isnt a blu ray player. It's a pc.
Your argument is based on pixie dust and fairy tales.
you want to pretend competition with HD-DVD had no effect on Blu-Ray hardware prices? of course prices didn't spike through the roof after HD-DVD failed. it would have angered consumers.
and last i checked, Blu-Ray was still far from being the only video format these days. far far far from being the only video format.
A one console future means an underpowered 20 year console future.
No thanks.
They either are already or tried and failed in the past.a little off topic, maybe deserves a thread of it's own, but why don't any of the big 3 jump on the bandwagon mobile devices/computers/cars are on and put out new hardware every year or 2.
Blu-Ray prices didn't go down any faster than DVD prices when that format launched - which had no direct competitor like HD-DVD. As it turns out, Sony, Samsumg, LG, Sharp, Panasonic, et al, are all interested in making their products look attractive against each other's offerings.
Prices on this equipment actually goes down much faster historically than games consoles, because there's no price-fixing coming down from the format holder.
How so? The cost of building a competent PC has also gone way, way down in the past decade.A games console isnt a blu ray player. It's a pc.
Your argument is based on pixie dust and fairy tales.
They either are already or tried and failed in the past.
But it's also not as easy as just jumping into anything and everything. If that was the case we'd have Microsoft cookies and Sony condoms. Actually, I can see Nintendo getting into making condoms before Sony.
Competition is good for business, though. I wouldn't want solely one console.
That sounds poetic but I just don't see the logic behind it.Even if the companies did make a one console future... A competitor would inevitably emerge that would tout something that may possibly be even better.
A single console would reinvent the industry, not just 'innovate' it. That's what will save it from becoming stagnant.
and DVD wasn't competiting with anything when it came to market? that's a weird suggestion to me.
the price on things which just have to play a couple of video codecs is always going to drop much faster than the price on something which has to be able to play all the same video games as their competitors. creating a chip to run a graphics API to exact performance specifications no less, is not going to be cheap or easy.
we would likely have a situation like 3DO where a single company creates the graphics chipset (likely AMD or Nvidia) and that single company would be under little pressure to drive down the costs of making that chipset, because it would be incredibly difficult for another company to make a chipset that could perform the same complex tasks equally well.
How so? The cost of building a competent PC has also gone way, way down in the past decade.
i don't think video formats really have 'gens' in the same way consoles do. VHS and DVD both played the same films. you didn't have to buy a DVD player to watch the latest movies.DVD was competing with VHS, which was a last-gen product, and obviously movies and TV. a Single console would be competing against last-gen products (much as current consoles do) and would be competing with PC gaming, casual web gaming, phones and handhelds.
Personally I find the current model inadequate and I know some people here don't like the idea out of company cheerleading.This is a child's view of the video game world.
i don't think video formats really have 'gens' in the same way consoles do. VHS and DVD both played the same films. you didn't have to buy a DVD player to watch the latest movies.
DVD doesn't look to be going anywhere even though the next 'gen' has been going on for years.
it's not an equivalent situation. people only seem to move onto a new media format in large numbers when something more convenient shows up. it's never seemed to be about the quality of the picture or sound that the new media supports for anything more than the AVS crowd. that's not the case with console gaming at all.
as i keep harping on about, while in 2005 there was essentially only one video format, in 2012 there are a bunch, with no sign of consumers settling on one over the others yet. until there's evidence that consumers want it, it's not going to happen, and nothing i see in 2012, from computers, to smart phones, to how close the console war this gen is, to the situation with DVD, Blu-Ray, streaming and downloading, seems to suggest that consumers want ONE standard in any sizeable number.
or another way of looking at it, if the entertainment and technology industry have failed to make a standard format for films, why does anyone expect they could do it for games?
...and Nintendo put all of their awesome franchises into on super console?