Nobody mentioned "teams" but as I said it assumes (evidently correctly) that there will be people on that track and to avoid anybody on that track dying you can help pull in the direction that leads to nobody dying by risking yourself getting on the track or get off the track and pull in the opposite direction where you make it more likely for those on it to die. This isn't an indication of moral superiority it's just an accurate representation of the problem.The image literally shows "Team Red" asking if they should help "Team Blue". A discussion, a division, between groups. The problem faced is an individual one, people don't get to be pre-approved or check what their peers are up to.
There are no teams in this. There's no signaling to others, unlike how we're seeing it in online polls and posts. Each individual must decide on their own with only their own thoughts to guide them.
I'm not making any statements here or answering questions based on these given pictures/polls because in reality I would have none of those things when making this decision.
What all these things are is just people trying to justify their position by either talking about how amazing it makes them look or how demonic it makes the opponent look. They're not reframing the problem in meaningful ways. Not even like the mathematical style breakdowns.
The "shouldn't we help them" was from the original image somewhere and it put it there with the reds. There was also a woman in white on the top right off the track with "fuck them" that I had to erase. Not sure how she ended up there:
Last edited: