• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Fanservice Designs (That Are Justifiable)

The only one actually justified in the OP is Morrigan.

I like Lulu but her outfit is just stupid.

I realize "justified" is maybe not the best word I could have used, but it's the only one I could think of for the topic.

If I just called it "fanservice designs you are okay with" this thread would just be a screenshot gallery.

Ah, I see.
 
Chloe from Uncharted 2 was a little fanservicey with how much they focused on her butt but it wasnt overkill because the story emphasized that she was in subtle competition with Elena for Drake's attraction.
 
Ivy Valentine

soulcalibur4ivy_b600x480.jpeg


Justifiable in the sense that, when engaged in battle with an opponent, it is imperative that you remain agile, especially when wielding a tricky and hard-to-manage weapon like the whip. So equiping the bare minimum armour that only covers the key areas of the body (i.e. easy targets) makes total sense.
 
Bringing down an entire warship of armed military men with just a wink and a smile sounds awful?

Hancock is pretty much Bayonetta, only without the sadistic torture kills. She's fully confident in her appearance, and uses it as a literal weapon.

Sounds awesome and empowering to me, but to each their own.

I do agree with Eva though. It's the same concept, and she's far and away the most positively portrayed MGS female character.
I mean, I like Boa. I have not kept up after the time skip, but I liked her before that.

However, the way you are describing her is really all about her looks. It just doesn't sound empowering. It seems like she is nothing more than a pretty face capable of manipulating men around her. That's a fairly well worn cliche.
 
I would say this is maybe justified just because it represents actual things she at least had in metroid games.

ZeroSuitSamusAltOutfit.jpg
 
All of FF XIV A Realm Reborn?

It's basically aesthetic fan service toward nostalgia for the art of FF VI, XI, and XII.

It works because, 1. it's cool, 2. it's a MMO which means art/lore often revolves around gamer entertainment (e.g. progression or content) rather than creativity authenticty, 3. it was a failing MMO that arguably 'was not FF enough' and needed to boost fan excitement/interest.

I wouldn't necessarily want a new single player story FF designed that way as I appreciate art that tries to stand on its own new creativity vision, but for a MMO it was rather smart (and successful) game design.
 
Ivy Valentine

soulcalibur4ivy_b600x480.jpeg


Justifiable in the sense that, when engaged in battle with an opponent, it is imperative that you remain agile, especially when wielding a tricky and hard-to-manage weapon like the whip. So equiping the bare minimum armour that only covers the key areas of the body (i.e. easy targets) makes total sense.

or she just likes to always wear her dominatrix outfit.
 
There's her victory pose which isn't exactly subtle, I think she's fine apart from that

I basically fully agree. But in the same aspect I think everyone doing the same pose when you finish a fight is pretty goofy and repetitive. It'd be less of an issue if everyone in the game had 2 or 3 victory poses.
 
Ivy Valentine

soulcalibur4ivy_b600x480.jpeg


Justifiable in the sense that, when engaged in battle with an opponent, it is imperative that you remain agile, especially when wielding a tricky and hard-to-manage weapon like the whip. So equiping the bare minimum armour that only covers the key areas of the body (i.e. easy targets) makes total sense.

Her "armor" does a poor job of that. If anything it makes her less agile. She really lacks breast support.
 
I feel like we need to more carefully define "fanservice", because OP and most of the thread seem to think it means semi-naked women? I'm generally a fan of the most of the games I buy and play for any length of time, and I always cringe at this stuff.
 
Not sure if this one is as justified though

Spoilers for splatoon 2

Callie with most of her top half uncovered and a thong

NjM5NDFhMDI3OSMvYkxjSmJEbWJEYk8xdFF3Ykp3dVhKTzhnOXpNPS8weDEwMjoxNDQweDgyNy9maXQtaW4vNzYweDAvZmlsdGVyczpmb3JtYXQoanBlZyk6cXVhbGl0eSg4MCk6bm9fdXBzY2FsZSgpOmZvcm1hdChqcGVnKS9odHRwOi8vczMuYW1hem9uYXdzLmNvbS9wb2xpY3ltaWMtaW1hZ2VzLzRhMXVqYm9oeWZzdnRqdHV3dnk1MjkydG15eHI5cG03aTd5a2tvbDY0Z2hramY1dGxocGFydWtiNHd6MDE5c2MuanBn.jpg
 
"Examples of objectified women in gaming that you're able to overlook because you can rationalize what ultimately amounts to, fap material at the experience of not only the representation of women but the medium itself"

The thread. Good lord someone said Ivy's outfit would support help support movement.....
breasts+gravity, how do they work?
 
"Examples of objectified women in gaming that you're able to overlook because you can rationalize what ultimately amounts to, fap material at the experience of not only the representation of women but the medium itself"

The thread. Good lord someone said Ivy's outfit would support help support movement.....
breasts+gravity, how do they work?
Pretty sure he was being sarcastic.
 
I feel like we need to more carefully define "fanservice", because OP and most of the thread seem to think it means semi-naked women? I'm generally a fan of the most of the games I buy and play for any length of time, and I always cringe at this stuff.

7GHbiuG.jpg


Is this an accurate depiction of your face the entire time you play these games???
 
I feel like we need to more carefully define "fanservice", because OP and most of the thread seem to think it means semi-naked women? I'm generally a fan of the most of the games I buy and play for any length of time, and I always cringe at this stuff.

Fanservice just means titillation these days. That's just how it is.
 
It's not like justification are going to make the people who hate that stuff hate it less. Just do the skimpy and be honest about it.

"avatar quote"
I mean, with cases like EVA it's an actual justification, It's part of her character and makes sense. It's fine if the artists wants to make a half naked characters ,as long as they're aware that's what they're doing and don't try to find a justifictation afterwards.
Don't try to sell me this character in fetish gear with half assed excuses.
 
Kaine, totally. 2B and A2 and all the ladies of NieR Automata? What justification can be made for those?

Don't get me wrong, I love the designs and characters of Automata, but they're unjustifiably "fanservice-y"
The Yorha androids are partially propoganda-bots (morale among androids can be pretty shit) and the flashy designs are meant to make them striking and memorable. Also the story equates the thrill of combat with sexual pleasure at a few points.
 
Quiet, such a memorable character and an awesome buddy.

Yoko Taro’s ladies (Kaine, Zero, 2B etc.).
You can make a strong argument for Kaine, but like 2B? Nah. That is what it is.

The Yorha androids are partially propoganda-bots (morale among androids can be pretty shit) and the flashy designs are meant to make them striking and memorable. Also the story equates the thrill of combat with sexual pleasure at a few points.
Come on that's stretching pretty far for an in universe justification.
 
Honestly i don't care about fanservice designs they look nice. But i prefer the designs in my profile pic or Marina/Midna/Zelda above those.

Not every women design needs a big ass or bust but if it fit's em why not? Women come in all sizes etc so do males.

Ofcourse there are some ridiculous fanservice designs but something like Samus or those fire emblem waifu's i don't mind tbh.

Quiet tho... Yeah that was a bit much. Eva Sniper Wolf, Even The Boss had fan service but they were legit good characters, in those cases i don't care tbh.

The OP's ones are fine.
I do find that there should be more male character fan service too tho to balance it out a bit.
 
"avatar quote"
I mean, with cases like EVA it's an actual justification, It's part of her character and makes sense. It's fine if the artists wants to make a half naked characters ,as long as they're aware that's what they're doing and don't try to find a justifictation afterwards.
Don't try to sell me this character in fetish gear with half assed excuses.

There's justification for her to be sexy but sexy doesn't have to mean half naked. There's tons of ways design a sexy female character without her boobs hanging out (I'm definitely a fan of this but I don't need any story justification).
 
The Yorha androids are partially propoganda-bots (morale among androids can be pretty shit) and the flashy designs are meant to make them striking and memorable. Also the story equates the thrill of combat with sexual pleasure at a few points.
If the thrill of combat is akin to sexual pleasure then why aren't they dressed to make combat as easy as possible over high heels that could interrupt it
? Because that justification is stupid
, there's never in the history of this medium been a genuine "good" justifiable reason for "our designers were mostly comprised of men and thus objectified women because we're a bit creatively lazy in that regard so here's another example of incredibly well worn character design tropes"

Do they explain why the bottom of the dress is made out of belts? Doesn't seem entirely practical for her role, nor for any kind of prolonged, high stamina activities.
Because Nomura wanted to challenge his team iirc, in response they removed her from any cutscene that required physical activity lmfao.
 
Kaine, totally. 2B and A2 and all the ladies of NieR Automata? What justification can be made for those?

Don't get me wrong, I love the designs and characters of Automata, but they're unjustifiably "fanservice-y"

Humanity is a big theme in the game, the robots and androids are trying to understand and/or recreate human behavior. Frequent visuals of the robots trying to recreate sexual acts, trying to understand love etc, it feels very uncanny and I could see the argument that the android's outfits feed into this as well.

If I recall Jackass is discussing fetishising or sexualising violence as well.

Although, obviously the main reason for this is because Taro "likes girls"

there's never in the history of this medium been a genuine "good" justifiable reason for "our designers were mostly comprised of men and thus objectified women because we're a bit creatively lazy in that regard so here's another example of incredibly well worn character design tropes"

Yea, this is a problem in the industry.
 
If the thrill of combat is akin to sexual pleasure then why aren't they dressed to make combat as easy as possible over high heels that could interrupt it
? Because that justification is stupid
, there's never in the history of this medium been a genuine "good" justifiable reason for "our designers were mostly comprised of men and thus objectified women because we're a bit creatively lazy in that regard so here's another example of incredibly well worn character design tropes"
Cause video games are a visual medium and character designs can and should reflect themes/atmosphere/feelings the creators are going for even if they don't make "practical" sense.
 
I would say this is maybe justified just because it represents actual things she at least had in metroid games.

ZeroSuitSamusAltOutfit.jpg

I mean, these definitely feel more practical than the Zero Suit as far as outfits go. They're essentially just athletic outfits. They show more skin but I'd say they're less fanservice-y than the standard skintight look.

Except for the jet heels because those are so obviously, thoroughly dumb that they cancel out any practicality.
 
My two main examples are Bayonetta and Zero Suit Samus, and both for totally different reasons.

Bayonetta is simple -- she fucking rocks that shit, doesn't give a fuck, and at absolutely no point does it seem like she's doing it for attention or for anyone other than her feeling like the badass she is.

Zero Suit Samus because it *completely* makes sense and is pretty much what she'd be wearing even if she was a male -- it's space underwear, and is simply the layer between her and the metal robot suit. It needs to be form fitting because otherwise it simply wouldn't work as what it is. People who have an issue with this design point to either Smash 4, ignoring the history of it and how it was depicted (where it's fanservice in terms of nostalgia, and not sexuality), or point to Other M, which yes was a bad game and we know it.

I mean, these definitely feel more practical than the Zero Suit as far as outfits go. They're essentially just athletic outfits. They show more skin but I'd say they're less fanservice-y than the standard skintight look.

Except for the jet heels because those are so obviously, thoroughly dumb that they cancel out any practicality.

Case in point; ignoring that having gaps like that would do nothing to stop the metallic gaps in the robot armor would pinch the ever loving hell out of you.
Jet heels are there to justify ZSS being her own character, and as a subtle finger wag at Other M's ZSS design.
 
Good lord someone said Ivy's outfit would support help support movement.....
breasts+gravity, how do they work?

Lol, this was what I always replied as a kid when someone walked in on me playing Dead or Alive asking why the girls were so skimpily dressed. I knew very well that was complete BS, but I thought it was a funny way to shut everyone up. ;)

I actually love me some sexy fanservice in games, but only if it is still tasteful and aesthetic. This for example I don't deem tasteful or aesthetic in any way:

Oneechanbara-1.jpg
 
I would say this is maybe justified just because it represents actual things she at least had in metroid games.

ZeroSuitSamusAltOutfit.jpg

Plus it's not usually her intention to wear it, she only has to fight in it when something's gone horribly wrong. It's basically her undershirt so she not naked in the suite. D.Va's outfit is somewhat similar in function.
 
Cause video games are a visual medium and character designs can and should reflect themes/atmosphere/feelings the creators are going for even if they don't make "practical" sense.
Hence why we get so many bad characters designs for women since oftentimes they end up contradicting the themes, atmosphere, and feelings of the games they're in.
 
Lol, this was what I always replied as a kid when someone walked in on me playing Dead or Alive asking why the girls were so skimpily dressed. I knew very well that was complete BS, but I thought it was a funny way to shut everyone up. ;)

I actually love me some sexy fanservice in games, but only if it is still tasteful and aesthetic. This for example I don't deem tasteful or aestetic in any way:
tenor.gif

Genuinely don't even know why the devs just didn't create a nude mod at that point wtf?
 
Everything is "justifiable" that doesn't really mean much in this context, it's whether you as an individual accepts the justification. I don't know how Lulu fits though, like her style of dress doesn't feed into her character in any particularly interesting way.

As for the question, idk Bayonetta is pretty much the only good example I can think of.
Both are technically Witches and you think Bayonetta is a good example?
Lulu looks like a witch, the belts just go with Gothic look she has, it fits her character her dress is just overdesigned.
Bayonetta looks a Dominatrix/ Woman with glasses fetish design, and she is naked when she summons too because it's her hair? Bayonetta is probably the worse out the bunch, even Quiet is more justifiable
 
I mean, I like Boa. I have not kept up after the time skip, but I liked her before that.

However, the way you are describing her is really all about her looks. It just doesn't sound empowering. It seems like she is nothing more than a pretty face capable of manipulating men around her. That's a fairly well worn cliche.

It's really about the over-the-top way she does it. Again, I draw comparisons to Bayonetta, who also operates in an exaggeratedly sexual manner that people attributed it as positive rather than cringey.

Just look at her signature pose:

boa-hancock-pose-one-piece.png


where she arcs her head back to such a ridiculous degree as to show how she's always looking down at you.

It's so stupid it wraps itself back to being amazing.

Also she does have an extended (and tragic) backstory, but I was trying to make the OP minimal at length. The short version is that she was a child slave who was eventually freed, then rose up to create her own kingdom of amazons and eventually grow in power as one of the Warlords of the Sea.

Without a doubt, Hancock owns her sexuality, and has used it to amass a literal kingdom.
 
Lol, this was what I always replied as a kid when someone walked in on me playing Dead or Alive asking why the girls were so skimpily dressed. I knew very well that was complete BS, but I thought it was a funny way to shut everyone up. ;)

I actually love me some sexy fanservice in games, but only if it is still tasteful and aesthetic. This for example I don't deem tasteful or aesthetic in any way:

Oneechanbara-1.jpg


source.gif
 
Top Bottom