Srsly said:Why not feral cats as well? Feral cats are just as invasive and piss their foul hormone-laden piss everywhere while decimating native song-bird and reptile populations.
What solution would you define as effective?Fugu said:I'm surprised at the hostility exhibited in this debate. It's ridiculous.
For the record, I think that this problem is being overblown and that even if it wasn't that solution wouldn't be appropriate. I think it is hypocritical to assert that arbitrary attacks should be solved by arbitrary attacks. It is an effective solution, obviously, but I don't believe that it's a moral one.
Maximum efficacy? Killing them all. I'm not exactly qualified to measure the efficacy of other measures, but it is presumptuous to assume that there are no less cruel methods with some degree of efficacy. I would imagine that implementations designed to prevent the overlap of congregation of hogs and humans would be effective, as they have been involving other species.OttomanScribe said:What solution would you define as effective?
Are you looking for specific posts? Because I feel that that would be counterproductive to reducing the amount of hostility in this thread. I figure a "you know who you are" approach is adequate amongst adults (or people posing as adults).What would you say are examples of hostility in this thread?
How do you kill 2 million of something without chemicals or biological agents that could harm other species you're trying to protect?Fugu said:Maximum efficacy? Killing them all. I'm not exactly qualified to measure the efficacy of other measures, but it is presumptuous to assume that there are no less cruel methods with some degree of efficacy. I would imagine that implementations designed to prevent the overlap of congregation of hogs and humans would be effective, as they have been involving other species.
Subitai said:How do you kill 2 million of something without chemicals or biological agents that could harm other species you're trying to protect?
Fugu said:Maximum efficacy? Killing them all. I'm not exactly qualified to measure the efficacy of other measures, but it is presumptuous to assume that there are no less cruel methods with some degree of efficacy. I would imagine that implementations designed to prevent the overlap of congregation of hogs and humans would be effective, as they have been involving other species.
Are you looking for specific posts? Because I feel that that would be counterproductive to reducing the amount of hostility in this thread. I figure a "you know who you are" approach is adequate amongst adults (or people posing as adults).
Texas Feral Hog Facts (source: Texas AgriLife Extension Service)
Feral hogs cause an estimated $400 million in damages annually.
There are an estimated 2 million feral hogs in Texas.
Feral hogs are predators of lambs, kid goats, baby calves, newborn fawns and ground-nesting birds, and compete for food and space with many native species of wildlife.
Feral hogs commonly destroy urban yards, parks and golf courses, as well as rangeland, pastures, crops, fencing, wildlife feeders and other property. Additionally, they contribute to E. Coli and other diseases in Texas streams, ponds and watersheds.
Vehicle collisions with feral hogs cause an estimated $1,200 in damage per collision, and create safety hazards for those involved.
http://www.agr.state.tx.us/agr/media...0786_0,00.html
Srsly said:Why not feral cats as well? Feral cats are just as invasive and piss their foul hormone-laden piss everywhere while decimating native song-bird and reptile populations.
SpacLock said:Even though there's no green in my area on the OP's map, there's been signs posted all over my area about this. Might pick a couple off myself.
Srsly said:Why not feral cats as well? Feral cats are just as invasive and piss their foul hormone-laden piss everywhere while decimating native song-bird and reptile populations.
From what I've heard only the little ones (under 100 lbs) are delicious, the big ones have a bad smell and taste. But you could still kill them and sell them to a dogfood/catfood company.From The Dust said:eat them. I hear they are delishious
My family has property in south Texas and we regulary trap, kill, and eat hogs and they are delicious. Feral hogs can get monstrously large and the ones we trap are a good size but probably small in comparison.Full Recovery said:From what I've heard only the little ones (under 100 lbs) are delicious, the big ones have a bad smell and taste. But you could still kill them and sell them to a dogfood/catfood company.
More meat for me!!!!Proelite said:Fuck you and fuck all humans.
I am fucking done being one. Where can I sign for Buddhism? Or should I just be a vegan?
Amakusa said:Once a Month they should have BBQ day, all you can eat pumbaa day! It starts in the morning, Hunt and slaughter your own wild Hog, then clean it and grill it up.
Misanthropy said:In my view it should be against the law to pass any laws which allow the uncontrolled extermination of another species simply because they are a "nuisance" to us. I say this because we have no right to give ourselves the power to kill of living creatures.
Isn't this BS? I remember reading certain ants will over take other ant hills and move in. It had something to do with food supply around their hill drying out.Qwomo said:ANIMALS NEVER HAD A WAR
WHO'S THE REAL ANIMALS?
People suck, they seriously do sometimes - especially ignorant people.... Animals have much better ethics & morals
Sgt.Pepper said:Wait, why coyotes too?
not exactly an unprovoked attack if he's huntingThere are numerous accounts of hunters (usually hunting hogs with dogs) getting hooked by a boar. While bowhunting for hogs on the 4X Ranch south of San Antonio I met a man that had 83 stitches on his left leg after a hog got hold of him in a cactus thicket while running it with dogs a few years previous. I have since lost track of the man, but I will never forget seeing his scars.
scar tissue said:not exactly an unprovoked attack if he's hunting
serves him right, lol (although i'm not necessarily against bowhunting)
also, this wouldn't be necessary if asshole humans hadn't reduced/exterminated the natural predators of the boars
man, sometimes i really hate humanity
Coyotes are a huge problem, especially in cattle country. If a cow is giving birth the coyotes will gang up on it and tear the calf and the rest of the birthing stuff to pieces, it's whats for dinner.From The Dust said:I didn't think coyotes were a problem. I feel like that and the foxes addtion was just some shit by a rep from a redneck county
about relocating? lol, I think you need to see the map and numbers again
Show them thisQwomo said:Reminds me of this facebook status I saw on my feed recently that made me laugh until I died:
uh, so humans introduced them?From The Dust said:there is no natural predator. they don't even belong in these areas
Full Recovery said:Coyotes are a huge problem, especially in cattle country. If a cow is giving birth the coyotes will gang up on it and tear the calf and the rest of the birthing stuff to pieces, it's whats for dinner.
scar tissue said:uh, so humans introduced them?
either way, when an ecosystem is fucked up, it's always either the fault of
a) humans
b) natural catastrophe
a) happens a lot more often than b)
i really have no idea what kind of natural catastrophe could've caused a huge hog population, so i'm going with a)
well, who let the hogs escape?From The Dust said:not entirely. if I remember correctly, most wild hogs are decended from escaped domestic hogs. it's not nessesarily humans' fault there.
So because it's the human fault in the first place, they should put aside any legitimate concerns that exist now and not solve the problem.scar tissue said:uh, so humans introduced them?
either way, when an ecosystem is fucked up, it's always either the fault of
a) humans
b) natural catastrophe
a) happens a lot more often than b)
i really have no idea what kind of natural catastrophe could've caused a huge hog population, so i'm going with a)
scar tissue said:well, who let the hogs escape?
the essence of the problem is: if humans hadn't somehow fucked up, we wouldn't have to slaughter these pigs
they should be hunted to extinction ASAP if they don't belong there
don't let them sustain a population for hunting purposes, that's just wrong
also, the exterminating should be done by trained professionals, not gun-ho rednecks
just because it has to be done doesn't mean it should be fun
we don't let normal people carry out the death penalty either, do we?
people who hunt for fun make me sick
scar tissue said:well, who let the hogs escape?
the essence of the problem is: if humans hadn't somehow fucked up, we wouldn't have to slaughter these pigs
they should be hunted to extinction ASAP if they don't belong there
don't let them sustain a population for hunting purposes, that's just wrong
also, the exterminating should be done by trained professionals, not gun-ho rednecks
just because it has to be done doesn't mean it should be fun
we don't let normal people carry out the death penalty either, do we?
people who hunt for fun make me sick
did you read my post?elrechazao said:So because it's the human fault in the first place, they should put aside any legitimate concerns that exist now and not solve the problem.
Vindictiveness over practicality...yay!
Nice solution, Captain Hindsight.scar tissue said:well, who let the hogs escape?
the essence of the problem is: if humans hadn't somehow fucked up, we wouldn't have to slaughter these pigs
Bingo.they should be hunted to extinction ASAP if they don't belong there
Nobody is trying to do that.don't let them sustain a population for hunting purposes, that's just wrong
Nice generalizing, dude. Obviously all hunters are gun-ho rednecks.also, the exterminating should be done by trained professionals, not gun-ho rednecks
Just because it has to be done doesn't mean it can't be fun.just because it has to be done doesn't mean it should be fun
So hogs=humans?we don't let normal people carry out the death penalty either, do we?
Because you're weak-minded and ignorant.people who hunt for fun make me sick
You, sir, are no ThoseDeafMutes.scar tissue said:well, who let the hogs escape?
the essence of the problem is: if humans hadn't somehow fucked up, we wouldn't have to slaughter these pigs
they should be hunted to extinction ASAP if they don't belong there
don't let them sustain a population for hunting purposes, that's just wrong
also, the exterminating should be done by trained professionals, not gun-ho rednecks
just because it has to be done doesn't mean it should be fun
we don't let normal people carry out the death penalty either, do we?
people who hunt for fun make me sick
Hunt them to extinction? That's as bad as the holocaust. Well, based on your moral equivalency in the other post at least. Just trying to keep up with your standards.scar tissue said:did you read my post?
i said hunt them to extinction ASAP if they don't belong there, to reduce the amount of animals that have to be killed
if you let them sustain a small population, you can hunt them for an infinite amount of time and a potentially infinite amount of hogs will be killed
I'm pretty sure i made it obvious that i don't think hogs = humans, or do you think I would advocate hunting humans to extinction?BertramCooper said:So hogs=humans?
Yeah, because not finding delight in the killing of an animal is weak mindedBecause you're weak-minded and ignorant.
What moral element is activated if the person doing the killing derives some kind of satisfaction from the act, but doesn't exist when they do not? I'd like to explore this nonsensical theory of yours.scar tissue said:I'm pretty sure i made it obvious that i don't think hogs = humans, or do you think I would advocate hunting humans to extinction?
I'm saying that necessary violence should be dealt with professionally, not made fun
Yeah, because not finding delight in the killing of an animal is weak minded
GTFO
elrechazao said:So because it's the human fault in the first place, they should put aside any legitimate concerns that exist now and not solve the problem.
Vindictiveness over practicality...yay!
It breeds more violence.elrechazao said:What moral element is activated if the person doing the killing derives some kind of satisfaction from the act, but doesn't exist when they do not? I'd like to explore this nonsensical theory of yours.
You don't understand what hunting is.scar tissue said:It breeds more violence.
Someone who enjoys hunting these hogs won't stop once they're extinct, he'll go hunt something else, somewhere else.
Possibly he'll even breed stuff, release it, and then hunt it. That's what they do with pheasants in Europe. Fucked up.
what a killjoy. i'm sure the hunters will eat their pork most solemnlyscar tissue said:well, who let the hogs escape?
the essence of the problem is: if humans hadn't somehow fucked up, we wouldn't have to slaughter these pigs
they should be hunted to extinction ASAP if they don't belong there
don't let them sustain a population for hunting purposes, that's just wrong
also, the exterminating should be done by trained professionals, not gun-ho rednecks
just because it has to be done doesn't mean it should be fun
we don't let normal people carry out the death penalty either, do we?
people who hunt for fun make me sick
Breeds violence? You've already outed yourself as a depr herp derp worthy analyst who thinks that "gun ho" (it's "gung ho btw) rednecks are who hunt, and that in looking down on such people from your lofty superiority, that you can manage to miss the hypocrisy of judging hundreds of millions of people around the world as "red necks".scar tissue said:It breeds more violence.
Someone who enjoys hunting these hogs won't stop once they're extinct, he'll go hunt something else, somewhere else.
Possibly he'll even breed stuff, release it, and then hunt it. That's what they do with pheasants in Europe. Fucked up.
Might be i don't understand what hunting is like in the US and A, if you do it differentlyQwomo said:You don't understand what hunting is.