Can Crusher
Banned
Zack Snyder won't fool me again. I'll keep my mind open, but my hype in check.
Yeah, I'm not hyped by this.
Why is Batman switching on his own signal?
Why are his eyes glowing?
Why is Snyder using the worst possible Bat-symbol?
Why is Supes hovering in the exact spot where the Bat-signal is shining?
Too many illogicalities.
A filmic adaptation of Dark Knight Returns is nothing to get amped over....as a comic book fan?
I think he sometimes overdoes it with the slow mo because he wants to recreate the comic book panels. The slow-mo is basically just there to really hammer it home that this is the same image as in the comic.Just watched Man of Steel again tonight, and I still think that movie's great. I think a good part of it is that Zack Snyder kind of chilled out and just let the movie speak for itself, y'know? I really disliked his approach to action in his previous movies. The constant use of slow-mo and really blatant posing and stuff makes it feel like he's shouting at the audience about how cool everything is, like he's sitting next to you going "Oh this bit's really cool! Not this bit, just wait, THERE! Wasn't that awesome?" Man of Steel just gets on with it. No slow-mo, just Superman fighting motherfuckers and looking awesome doing it. It's like Snyder 2.0
So, yeah, I've got some newfound faith in the guy. I still want to see some footage of Batman in action, because I'd be really disappointed if he looked anything like the fighters in Watchmen, but hopefully Snyder will come good.
Haha, clearly I'm in the wrong here. Continue screaming, I'll just remain confused.
Yeah, I guess. Still doesn't elicit anywhere near that kind of reaction from me.
There was no slow mo. Digital zoom was his thing.I think he sometimes overdoes it with the slow mo because he wants to recreate the comic book panels. The slow-mo is basically just there to really hammer it home that this is the same image as in the comic.
Are you a comic book geek that has been standing in line for 22 hours to watch this crap?
They are.![]()
I didn't mean Man of Steel, but 300 and WatchmenThere was no slow mo. Digital zoom was his thing.
this. snyder seems to need to have a... visual tick in his films. he just switched out the slow-down then ramp up speed changes for the crappy digital zoom effect in MoS.There was no slow mo. Digital zoom was his thing.
Please tell me that is a joke.
Humor should come naturally with Batman and Superman feuding and 1up'ing each other. Eisenberg should also lighten the mood a bit at times.
Other than that, forget the Marvel witty banter bullshit.
I know nothing about the comics, but why does Batman want to fight Superman?
There are webm links in this thread. On mobile so I can't find them.
Edit here you go
http://a.pomf.se/ieoqjc.webm
There was no slow mo. Digital zoom was his thing.
I think it's like the equivalent of if Marvel tried to pull of Civil War in the MCU with their current roster. Not built up enough.Bat-Armor doesn't feel earned yet to me. Miller did something iconic with the characters that had a long history together.
This feels like a "Cheap Pop"
Slow-mo was very definitely his thing before Man of Steel. He was Captain Slow Motion; I still think 300 would only be like forty-five minutes long if they played it at full speed
I've always disliked slow-mo in action scenes, because I find full-speed martial arts and stuff far more exciting, so I really found nothing to like in Zack Snyder's previous stuff. I loved the action in Man of Steel, though. The crash zooms were a little much at times, but I think he did a better job of selling the speed and power of those characters than any other live-action thing I've seen.
I worry that Snyder might not have the chops for Batman's particular fighting style, but I think cutting out the slow-mo really forced him to focus on making his action scenes far more creative and exciting to watch, so I'm hopeful.
I think it's like the equivalent of if Marvel tried to pull of Civil War in the MCU with their current roster. Not built up enough.
I think it's like the equivalent of if Marvel tried to pull of Civil War in the MCU with their current roster. Not built up enough.
I think we'll get the closest thing to a real Batman than we've ever received.
Movies don't have that same time luxury.?
What was the build up in TDKR? It was a standalone Elseworlds story.
Bat-Armor doesn't feel earned yet to me. Miller did something iconic with the characters that had a long history together.
This feels like a "Cheap Pop"
What was the build up in TDKR? It was a standalone Elseworlds story.
It's the context of them working together for a long time in comics. If this is Superman's first interaction with batman it's not really similar to TDKR at all, which was a fight where Superman was trying to give Bruce every chance to surrender and give up he could since they were old friends.
It's the context of them working together for a long time in comics. If this is Superman's first interaction with batman it's not really similar to TDKR at all, which was a fight where Superman was trying to give Bruce every chance to surrender and give up he could since they were old friends.
Exactly.
It's like putting the Hulkbuster armour, and that fight, into Avengers 1. And even then, considering the establishing films, that would feel more earned.
But Snyder, a fan of The Dark Knight Returns, can't resist putting it on film the first opportunity he gets. Unless Superman is under mind control, the fight can't make sense this early in them meeting. If Superman just fights every human who challenges him, he's not Superman.
It's probably not their first interaction then. They'll make it work. I don't see the point of making every negative assumption about this movie two years out. How do you people have the energy?It's the context of them working together for a long time in comics. If this is Superman's first interaction with batman it's not really similar to TDKR at all, which was a fight where Superman was trying to give Bruce every chance to surrender and give up he could since they were old friends.
It's the context of them working together for a long time in comics. If this is Superman's first interaction with batman it's not really similar to TDKR at all, which was a fight where Superman was trying to give Bruce every chance to surrender and give up he could since they were old friends.
& a fight where Batman only knew how to take down Superman because he'd obviously got very intimate knowledge on him over the years.
Exactly. Essentially after decades of knowing Superman, Batman's best plan is to distract him for 5 minutes when he's weakened, then have him hit with kryptonite.
Compare that to their first meeting in Lex Luthor: Man of Steel. That's how it would pan out. Or even like the Batman/Superman World's Finest animated movie.
Again, unless Superman is mind controlled, this fight can't happen organically this early in their relationship. They'd probably be on speaking terms for most of the film, so this happens in what, the first hour?
Yeah, I'm not hyped by this.
Why is Batman switching on his own signal?
Why are his eyes glowing?
Why is Snyder using the worst possible Bat-symbol?
Why is Supes hovering in the exact spot where the Bat-signal is shining?
Too many illogicalities.
Do we know how long after MoS this movie is set? Unless this encounter happens the next night (after MoS), there's plenty of ways to explain them having this fight early in the film.
I don't think it's all that far-fetched or out of place to have Batman in the armor. He's obviously done what homework was possible on Superman.
It's probably not their first interaction then. They'll make it work. I don't see the point of making every negative assumption about this movie two years out. How do you people have the energy?
I just find it very odd that grown adults can't think of ways that this could work. I prefer that conversation. THIS conversation is stupid. You're trying so hard to be sour on this movie while knowing nothing at all about it.
Do y'all think Wonder Woman will have a part in breaking up this fight?
?
This is first time Superman will be meeting Batman.
Okay, it sounds like I should try and read dark knight returns. I'm not much of a graphic novel/comic guy, so is it fine as a stand-alone? Any recommended reading before it? Anything that I should definitely read after?
Pretend I've never read an American comic..
Okay, it sounds like I should try and read dark knight returns. I'm not much of a graphic novel/comic guy, so is it fine as a stand-alone? Any recommended reading before it? Anything that I should definitely read after?
Pretend I've never read an American comic..
It's fine as a standalone. I wouldn't bother with the sequel, which is pretty much Justice League Returns, because you'd need a bit more knowledge of the characters to get anything resembling enjoyment out of it.
It's taking cues from DKR, its not an adaption of it.
Clark and Bruce meeting for the first time, something funny is bound to happen in that conversation. The inevitable mutual attraction to Diana should be fun. Forget it if Bruce starts meeting the women in Clark's life.Not necessarily. That all depends on the script and direction.
Superman is much weaker in MoS. Not much he could do to minimize the damage from a falling skyscraper while he's knocked out.
You say that like he didn't kill Zod to save human lives.
When the shit hits the fan Superman is willing to take a life. In the comics it happened with the pocket universe Phantom Zone criminals, it happened with Doomsday, and it happened in Final Crisis with Mandrakk and Darkseid.
I don't even think Goyer could suck all the amusement out of these scenes.
Weaker but stronger than Zod as he's been absorbing the Sun's energy for years instead of a few days. If he's strong enough to grind Zod's face into the side of a building he's strong enough to fly Zod elsewhere with a flying tackle. There's one scene where we get this third-person perspective of him punching Zod, flying towards Zod, and punching him again. He had opportunities.
Yes, to save those lives and that's all people need to believe now. "These guys are destroying the planet, Superman should just kill them and save lives". People shouldn't think that about Superman, that because he, or they, feel justified in him killing Zod because it was saving lives that it's "OK". Supes had enough strength to forcibly snap Zod's neck in the other direction with enough force that it breaks, he didn't have enough strength to turn Zod's head away from the people? Regardless, we now have a Superman that is willing to kill if the threat is big enough and that's an easy-out and against the character.
Oh, but don't worry, Batman will guide him and teach that killing is wrong. Ugh.