• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

First pics of current PSP2 DevKit [Update: Large Update In OP]

ULTROS! said:
Early PS3 titles? I can't tell the graphical difference of early PS3 title games and later PS3 titles games. :lol
untold-legends-dark-kingdom-20060314042059357.jpg


Kittonwy said:
:lol
 
PSP2 sounds really, really stupid. How much is this portable PS360 gonna cost? Looks like a bomba in the making.
 
jett said:
PSP2 sounds really, really stupid. How much is this portable PS360 gonna cost? Looks like a bomba in the making.

why would it, sell it at 249 or something like that and see people get it like crazy.
i mean madden nba 2k mlb and shooters with early ps3 graphics on the go is something a lot of people would want.
what would make this perfect is a 3G connection with a friendlist so you can do online play.
and this rumored start the game on your ps3 finish it on your psp2 is amazing as well.
 
Omiee said:
why would it, sell it at 249 or something like that and see people get it like crazy.
i mean madden nba 2k mlb and shooters with early ps3 graphics on the go is something a lot of people would want.
what would make this perfect is a 3G connection with a friendlist so you can do online play.
and this rumored start the game on your ps3 finish it on your psp2 is amazing as well.
If these rumors are true. I don't see $249 being feasible. At all.
 
Boney said:
If these rumors are true. I don't see $249 being feasible. At all.

like i said 299 even 399 is not to much for me, i mean an ipod touch is 299.
i just hope its under 300 dollars.
 
Omiee said:
why would it, sell it at 249 or something like that and see people get it like crazy.
i mean madden nba 2k mlb and shooters with early ps3 graphics on the go is something a lot of people would want.
what would make this perfect is a 3G connection with a friendlist so you can do online play.
and this rumored start the game on your ps3 finish it on your psp2 is amazing as well.

With all these features its really going to cost a fortune. $399 maybe.
 
webcivilian said:
With all these features its really going to cost a fortune. $399 maybe.
why i dont see the reasoning behind this, i mean they are selling the ps3 at a profit right, and you know they are not getting 299 cuz retailers have their share.
and the rumors say the processor is half of what the ps3's is.
i think they could release it for 299 and still make a profit on it or at least breaking even.
 
Hm, still not really sure how i feel about this. Itching for a reveal though. Maybe once i know more i will be more interested.

(Hell who am i kidding, i'll probably buy it anyway)
 
There's no chance in hell they are going to sell this thing at anything less than $399 if the rumors of its power are true.
 
Omiee said:
why i dont see the reasoning behind this, i mean they are selling the ps3 at a profit right, and you know they are not getting 299 cuz retailers have their share.
and the rumors say the processor is half of what the ps3's is.
i think they could release it for 299 and still make a profit on it or at least breaking even.
It's not as if they're cutting a PS3 in half, put a screen and buttons and call it a day.
 
jman2050 said:
There's no chance in hell they are going to sell this thing at anything less than $399 if the rumors of its power are true.

I remember people saying the same thing about the PSP before it came out.

Sony will find a way to sell it for <300. or else they’re just handing over the market to Nintendo and, yes, Apple.
 
Omiee said:
why i dont see the reasoning behind this, i mean they are selling the ps3 at a profit right, and you know they are not getting 299 cuz retailers have their share.
and the rumors say the processor is half of what the ps3's is.
i think they could release it for 299 and still make a profit on it or at least breaking even.

The reasoning behind this is basically the following factors:

1) R&D cost
2) Higher component cost at the start of cycle
3) Number of components. Re-engineering costs.

I could be wrong with the price assumption but the BOM cost doesn't really attribute to the real cost of any system. PS3's has different type of processor. It was never designed for mobile use. Even if its half the power the doesn't mean they will or can use the same processor or design. They definately can use the CELL architecture but they have to design it so they put in small enclosure with low heat dissipation without active cooling.
 
Manmademan said:
eh, I dunno if "Cartridge" is really the right term for flash memory sticks.
Just messing around. Even Nintendo calls DS carts "Game Cards", not cartridges.

Commanche Raisin Toast said:
what exactly is the difference between GBA carts and DS carts? (other than capacity i imagine)
GBA carts are memory-mapped devices (as were all previous consoles/handheld carts), while DS cards are block-devices.

Memory-mapped devices are like read-only RAM: the system can directly access any data in the cart as if it were in memory. Pros: can use data directly from cart without copying to RAM, usually with fast access times. Cons: the cartridge port limits the cart capacity (unless additional mapping hardware is used), needs tons of connection pins and limit types of storage technology that can be used.

Block devices use a serial interface: data is grouped in blocks, and the system needs to request entire blocks to access it (DS cards use 512 byte blocks). Hard drives, optical media, SD cards, memory sticks are all serial block devices. Pros: capacity is not limited by connection pins, can use any storage tech without changing the connection interface, uses less pins. Cons: slower, data needs to be stored in RAM before it can be used (like optical media).
 
M3d10n said:
Block devices use a serial interface: data is grouped in blocks, and the system needs to request entire blocks to access it (DS cards use 512 byte blocks). Hard drives, optical media, SD cards, memory sticks are all serial block devices. Pros: capacity is not limited by connection pins, can use any storage tech without changing the connection interface, uses less pins. Cons: slower, data needs to be stored in RAM before it can be used (like optical media).

I think they are working on something faster.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/30/sandisk-sony-and-nikon-propose-500mb-per-second-memory-card-wi/
 
M3d10n said:
Block devices use a serial interface: data is grouped in blocks, and the system needs to request entire blocks to access it (DS cards use 512 byte blocks). Hard drives, optical media, SD cards, memory sticks are all serial block devices. Pros: capacity is not limited by connection pins, can use any storage tech without changing the connection interface, uses less pins. Cons: slower, data needs to be stored in RAM before it can be used (like optical media).

Isn't a block memory storage still faster than loading from optical media?
 
M3d10n said:
GBA carts are memory-mapped devices (as were all previous consoles/handheld carts), while DS cards are block-devices.

Memory-mapped devices are like read-only RAM: the system can directly access any data in the cart as if it were in memory. Pros: can use data directly from cart without copying to RAM, usually with fast access times. Cons: the cartridge port limits the cart capacity (unless additional mapping hardware is used), needs tons of connection pins and limit types of storage technology that can be used.

Block devices use a serial interface: data is grouped in blocks, and the system needs to request entire blocks to access it (DS cards use 512 byte blocks). Hard drives, optical media, SD cards, memory sticks are all serial block devices. Pros: capacity is not limited by connection pins, can use any storage tech without changing the connection interface, uses less pins. Cons: slower, data needs to be stored in RAM before it can be used (like optical media).

sweet, thanks for the info man.

so i see we might have another facepalm when we find out what sony does with RAM. seems to be the case with each console they release. i will remain hopeful though.
 
Commanche Raisin Toast said:
sweet, thanks for the info man.

so i see we might have another facepalm when we find out what sony does with RAM. seems to be the case with each console they release. i will remain hopeful though.

Probably around 512MB. 1GB would be really awesome.
 
ZealousD said:
Isn't a block memory storage still faster than loading from optical media?
"Block memory storage" doesn't specify the storage medium, just how it's accessed. For all intents and purposes, optical media is block-memory storage. And it is DS carts, as well.
 
Omiee said:
why i dont see the reasoning behind this, i mean they are selling the ps3 at a profit right, and you know they are not getting 299 cuz retailers have their share.

The "retailer share" on a new gaming console is $0.01.
 
charlequin said:
The "retailer share" on a new gaming console is $0.01.
It is? Then what about that rumor that retailers pressured Nintendo with Wii to launch at $249 and that nobody has shown me the source for it. I guess it's bogus right?
 
Nintendo's profit per handheld sold has to be wayyy bigger than what Sony is gonna get. Seems that 3DS is going to be around ~$250, and for PSP2 to be competitive it's gonna need to be at the most $299, which I still feel is way too much.

The handheld world could be very weird next gen.
 
Boney said:
Good. I thought so, but people kept repeating it and always sent wrong links. Good to know about console margins though.

yeah, this isn't a secret to anyone who's worked videogame retail. the money is all in the accessories and games. This is why retailers are fond of forcing you into "bundles" around anticipated launches.

edit: sole exception to this is the PSPgo, for obvious reasons.
 
if they introduce the idea of playing ps3 games on you psp2 and expand on the remote play, and have complete psn access and multiplayer access, then it will be a great success, many gamers would love to beat that "one part" before work or school, now we would be able to with this device potentially.
 
:lol at some people thinking it would be $250, if it's gonna be so powerful it will be at least $350 :'( i can't afford two next gen handhelds.


the right analog stick over the buttons looks oddly placed. but still, finally two analog sticks :D
 
Those Untold Legends pic are infamous for being from a leak of an early build. THe final game looks nothing like that:
PS3UntoldLegendsDarkKingdom9.jpg


Though it may not be the best looking game (it wa s a quick work launch title) it still looked a lot better than those early leaks.
 
^^^It's an HD Wii game.

LCfiner said:
I remember people saying the same thing about the PSP before it came out.

Sony will find a way to sell it for <300. or else they’re just handing over the market to Nintendo and, yes, Apple.

Sony is in no position to make yet another system that will bleed red.
 
Flying_Phoenix said:
^^^It's an HD Wii game.



Sony is in no position to make yet another system that will bleed red.
Then they are likely building something they can sell for 250 or 300 MAX that will not lose them money. The alternatives are so boneheaded, they would deserve to fail.
 
The perception that the PS3 and PSP were huge failures is so pervasive. I think it's wrong.

Sony can still afford to sell the PSP2 at an initial loss. that said, I'd be extremely surprised if Sony couldn't deliver a product for $250 that wasn't a similar leap over competitors as the PSP was.
 
LCfiner said:
Then they are likely building something they can sell for 250 or 300 MAX that will not lose them money. The alternatives are so boneheaded, they would deserve to fail.

The ultra razor blade model has proved to be massive failure. It's dead. I can't really see where Sony can go with the PSP's successor.

I guess trying to expand a system to cover the whole media market (a PSP phone, a PSP media player, etc.) would be a nice move. But they'd get raped by Apple. They could try something new and revolutionary but Nintendo has adopted the glassesless 3D technology. It seems that the system is doomed for "mediocrity at best" no matter where it turns.

The Abominable Snowman said:
The perception that the PS3 and PSP were huge failures is so pervasive. I think it's wrong.

Sony can still afford to sell the PSP2 at an initial loss. that said, I'd be extremely surprised if Sony couldn't deliver a product for $250 that wasn't a similar leap over competitors as the PSP was.

It's not a matter of if they could afford to do so or not, but more so if its worth the risk.

Selling the PS3 at a high loss caused them to bleed a near countless amount of red in their financial sector. Having the original PSP come with such ambitious hardware had Sony being super frugal about dropping the systems pricetag which could have really helped it out while it was still duking with the DS.

This model of extreme loss for an extreme gain in loss leader has never worked for any console but the Playstation 2 due to the fact that the system dominated from right when it stepped out of the gate.

Kuran said:
Uh, PSP 1 is already on par with Wii.
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
 
The Abominable Snowman said:
The perception that the PS3 and PSP were huge failures is so pervasive. I think it's wrong.

Sony can still afford to sell the PSP2 at an initial loss. that said, I'd be extremely surprised if Sony couldn't deliver a product for $250 that wasn't a similar leap over competitors as the PSP was.

looking back now and seeing that the PSP was $250 at launch... i thought that was SO MUCH MONEY back then. yes, it still is a lot of money, but now we have people tossing around $500 for phones and ipods EACH YEAR and they don't seem to mind. but as soon as a gaming/multimedia price gets close to those figures stop the press... no one will buy that!

there were $500 phones back then too, but not until the razer and then iphone crazes have we seen masses of people dropping that much money so often on things they keep replacing over and over. so if sony can market this thing right (they won't) they could somehow tap into that psyche of those types of customers.
 
Flying_Phoenix said:
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

It's not funny?

Play God of War: Ghost of Sparta, and Monster Hunter Portable 3rd.

Sure you can argue details, screen size / resolution.. but when it comes down to it, it produces the same level of graphics when in good hands.
 
Flying_Phoenix said:
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
Technically? No. In practical terms, based on the average Wii grames' graphical output? Yes.
 
RiverBed said:
Those Untold Legends pic are infamous for being from a leak of an early build. THe final game looks nothing like that:
http://0.tqn.com/d/playstation/1/0/H/6/PS3UntoldLegendsDarkKingdom9.jpg[IMG]

Though it may not be the best looking game (it wa s a quick work launch title) it still looked a lot better than those early leaks.[/QUOTE]

It was not a leak. They uploaded it in the official website for the game.
 
So in summary we've got:

-a beasty looking processor
-high-res front touchscreen
-rear touch panel
-internal flash storage (16gb?)
-dual analog sticks
-2 cameras
-microphone(s?)
-wi-fi
-slide design
-1 or more card slots

Yeeeeeeeeah this thing is gonna be pricey, $350 if I had to bet. I really wish them luck but I just can't see it ending up in the black overall.

Though as a hardcore nerd it sounds fantastic, the homebrew potential is insane.
 
Top Bottom