Flying_Phoenix
Banned
ULTROS! said:Early PS3 titles? I can't tell the graphical difference of early PS3 title games and later PS3 titles games. :lol
:lolKittonwy said:RAWR!!!![]()
ULTROS! said:Early PS3 titles? I can't tell the graphical difference of early PS3 title games and later PS3 titles games. :lol
:lolKittonwy said:RAWR!!!![]()
Untold Legends: Dark Kingdom. I completely forgot about that.H_Prestige said:^ What the hell is that :lol
webcivilian said:Read maybe?
jett said:PSP2 sounds really, really stupid. How much is this portable PS360 gonna cost? Looks like a bomba in the making.
jett said:PSP2 sounds really, really stupid. How much is this portable PS360 gonna cost? Looks like a bomba in the making.
Flying_Phoenix said:![]()
:lol
If these rumors are true. I don't see $249 being feasible. At all.Omiee said:why would it, sell it at 249 or something like that and see people get it like crazy.
i mean madden nba 2k mlb and shooters with early ps3 graphics on the go is something a lot of people would want.
what would make this perfect is a 3G connection with a friendlist so you can do online play.
and this rumored start the game on your ps3 finish it on your psp2 is amazing as well.
Boney said:If these rumors are true. I don't see $249 being feasible. At all.
Omiee said:why would it, sell it at 249 or something like that and see people get it like crazy.
i mean madden nba 2k mlb and shooters with early ps3 graphics on the go is something a lot of people would want.
what would make this perfect is a 3G connection with a friendlist so you can do online play.
and this rumored start the game on your ps3 finish it on your psp2 is amazing as well.
why i dont see the reasoning behind this, i mean they are selling the ps3 at a profit right, and you know they are not getting 299 cuz retailers have their share.webcivilian said:With all these features its really going to cost a fortune. $399 maybe.
It's not as if they're cutting a PS3 in half, put a screen and buttons and call it a day.Omiee said:why i dont see the reasoning behind this, i mean they are selling the ps3 at a profit right, and you know they are not getting 299 cuz retailers have their share.
and the rumors say the processor is half of what the ps3's is.
i think they could release it for 299 and still make a profit on it or at least breaking even.
jman2050 said:There's no chance in hell they are going to sell this thing at anything less than $399 if the rumors of its power are true.
Omiee said:why i dont see the reasoning behind this, i mean they are selling the ps3 at a profit right, and you know they are not getting 299 cuz retailers have their share.
and the rumors say the processor is half of what the ps3's is.
i think they could release it for 299 and still make a profit on it or at least breaking even.
Just messing around. Even Nintendo calls DS carts "Game Cards", not cartridges.Manmademan said:eh, I dunno if "Cartridge" is really the right term for flash memory sticks.
GBA carts are memory-mapped devices (as were all previous consoles/handheld carts), while DS cards are block-devices.Commanche Raisin Toast said:what exactly is the difference between GBA carts and DS carts? (other than capacity i imagine)
M3d10n said:Block devices use a serial interface: data is grouped in blocks, and the system needs to request entire blocks to access it (DS cards use 512 byte blocks). Hard drives, optical media, SD cards, memory sticks are all serial block devices. Pros: capacity is not limited by connection pins, can use any storage tech without changing the connection interface, uses less pins. Cons: slower, data needs to be stored in RAM before it can be used (like optical media).
M3d10n said:Block devices use a serial interface: data is grouped in blocks, and the system needs to request entire blocks to access it (DS cards use 512 byte blocks). Hard drives, optical media, SD cards, memory sticks are all serial block devices. Pros: capacity is not limited by connection pins, can use any storage tech without changing the connection interface, uses less pins. Cons: slower, data needs to be stored in RAM before it can be used (like optical media).
M3d10n said:GBA carts are memory-mapped devices (as were all previous consoles/handheld carts), while DS cards are block-devices.
Memory-mapped devices are like read-only RAM: the system can directly access any data in the cart as if it were in memory. Pros: can use data directly from cart without copying to RAM, usually with fast access times. Cons: the cartridge port limits the cart capacity (unless additional mapping hardware is used), needs tons of connection pins and limit types of storage technology that can be used.
Block devices use a serial interface: data is grouped in blocks, and the system needs to request entire blocks to access it (DS cards use 512 byte blocks). Hard drives, optical media, SD cards, memory sticks are all serial block devices. Pros: capacity is not limited by connection pins, can use any storage tech without changing the connection interface, uses less pins. Cons: slower, data needs to be stored in RAM before it can be used (like optical media).
Commanche Raisin Toast said:sweet, thanks for the info man.
so i see we might have another facepalm when we find out what sony does with RAM. seems to be the case with each console they release. i will remain hopeful though.
"Block memory storage" doesn't specify the storage medium, just how it's accessed. For all intents and purposes, optical media is block-memory storage. And it is DS carts, as well.ZealousD said:Isn't a block memory storage still faster than loading from optical media?
Omiee said:why i dont see the reasoning behind this, i mean they are selling the ps3 at a profit right, and you know they are not getting 299 cuz retailers have their share.
It is? Then what about that rumor that retailers pressured Nintendo with Wii to launch at $249 and that nobody has shown me the source for it. I guess it's bogus right?charlequin said:The "retailer share" on a new gaming console is $0.01.
Boney said:Then what about that rumor that retailers pressured Nintendo with Wii to launch at $249 and that nobody has shown me the source for it. I guess it's bogus right?
Good. I thought so, but people kept repeating it and always sent wrong links. Good to know about console margins though.charlequin said:Totally.
Boney said:Good. I thought so, but people kept repeating it and always sent wrong links. Good to know about console margins though.
FF7 is my betPureauthor said:After reading the Mod Edit in the OP, the only thing I have to say is, 'Why?'
LCfiner said:I remember people saying the same thing about the PSP before it came out.
Sony will find a way to sell it for <300. or else theyre just handing over the market to Nintendo and, yes, Apple.
Sounds like about what the PSP 2 will produce no?Flying_Phoenix said:^^^It's an HD Wii game.
Then they are likely building something they can sell for 250 or 300 MAX that will not lose them money. The alternatives are so boneheaded, they would deserve to fail.Flying_Phoenix said:^^^It's an HD Wii game.
Sony is in no position to make yet another system that will bleed red.
yencid said:Sounds like about what the PSP 2 will produce no?
LCfiner said:Then they are likely building something they can sell for 250 or 300 MAX that will not lose them money. The alternatives are so boneheaded, they would deserve to fail.
The Abominable Snowman said:The perception that the PS3 and PSP were huge failures is so pervasive. I think it's wrong.
Sony can still afford to sell the PSP2 at an initial loss. that said, I'd be extremely surprised if Sony couldn't deliver a product for $250 that wasn't a similar leap over competitors as the PSP was.
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lolKuran said:Uh, PSP 1 is already on par with Wii.
The Abominable Snowman said:The perception that the PS3 and PSP were huge failures is so pervasive. I think it's wrong.
Sony can still afford to sell the PSP2 at an initial loss. that said, I'd be extremely surprised if Sony couldn't deliver a product for $250 that wasn't a similar leap over competitors as the PSP was.
Flying_Phoenix said::lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
Technically? No. In practical terms, based on the average Wii grames' graphical output? Yes.Flying_Phoenix said::lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
Kuran said:Uh, PSP 1 is already on par with Wii.
RiverBed said:Those Untold Legends pic are infamous for being from a leak of an early build. THe final game looks nothing like that:
http://0.tqn.com/d/playstation/1/0/H/6/PS3UntoldLegendsDarkKingdom9.jpg[IMG]
Though it may not be the best looking game (it wa s a quick work launch title) it still looked a lot better than those early leaks.[/QUOTE]
It was not a leak. They uploaded it in the official website for the game.