SCULLIBUNDO
Banned
http://www.thewrap.com/movies/colum...review-wait-didnt-we-see-all-internship-96186
http://variety.com/2013/film/reviews/film-review-monsters-university-1200494184/
http://www.indiewire.com/article/with-monsters-university-has-pixar-lost-its-street-cred?
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movie/monsters-university/review/564746
It should be noted that all the reviews seem to be praising the Umbrella short that plays beforehand. I guess that's something.
Falling as it does squarely between the studios classics and its decidedly lesser work, Monsters University is a solidly average Pixar effort, one that brings some laughs to the kegger, but youll be hard-pressed to remember it at the reunion in 10 years.
http://variety.com/2013/film/reviews/film-review-monsters-university-1200494184/
Not even attempting to scale the heights of Pixar past, Monsters University finds Disneys toon studio operating at a pleasantly middling level of artistic achievement. Tracing the friendship of scarer-in-chief Sulley and one-eyed sidekick Mike Wazowski back to its college-rivalry roots, this zippy, colorful, bright-minded prequel scarcely needed to exist, yet makes for perfectly agreeable entertainment now that it does.
http://www.indiewire.com/article/with-monsters-university-has-pixar-lost-its-street-cred?
Once upon a time, in a land that now looks so magical it could have been dreamed up, Pixar carried the virtues of an independent studio that delivered brainy alternatives to simplistic studio-produced animation. Whether exploring the end of humanity in "Wall-E" or the frustrations of the nuclear family in "The Incredibles," Pixar assailed society's mythologies and fears within a pop culture context in a fashion that at times almost felt subversive. By contrast, "Monsters University," the latest Pixar offering, charms in an excessively familiar way that illustrates a troublesome eventuality: Pixar has lost its edge.
As it has devolved into less of a disruptive force, the company got safe. Two years ago, "Cars 2" could have been written off as an anomaly (because "Cars" was a weak Pixar effort anyway), but then came last year's "Brave," an innocuous children's fairy tale that carried plenty of wholesome value in its unconventionally assertive princess but lacked the searing wit and complex subtext associated with most previous efforts.
Well, they say three makes a trend. "Monsters University," a prequel to the supremely imaginative "Monsters Inc.," fills in the background of those characters with a tame, cheery origin story that lacks the original's crackling wit, not to mention its stealthy satire of corporate bureaucracy. Capably directed by Dan Scanlon, "Monsters University" delivers a very basic, factory-certified animated adventure.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movie/monsters-university/review/564746
It should be remedial school, not an institution of higher learning, for Monsters University, an alarmingly lame effort from Pixar, the Oxbridge of animation studios. A prequel arriving 12 years after its progenitor, Monsters, Inc., this marks the third sub-par film in a row from Pixar, after Cars 2 and Brave, suggesting that the brain trust in Emeryville has lost a bit of its edge. Certainly, this genial and inoffensive G-rated lark about cute characters doing their darndest to become scary monsters will play well enough with its intended audience (most members of which weren't even born when the original came out), but it will register as a notable artistic underachiever with people who expect the best from its maker.
A humdrum straight line of a film, Monsters University never surprises, goes off in unexpected directions or throws you for a loop in the manner of the best Pixar stories. Nor does it come close to elating through the sheer imagination of its conceits and storytelling; Toy Story 3, three years and three Pixar films back, was the last time that happened
It should be noted that all the reviews seem to be praising the Umbrella short that plays beforehand. I guess that's something.