• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Forbes: Jack Tretton on the PS4

I agree with the mobile gaming part. I mean my mom and aunt never played games. Then they got into gaming with their Kindle Fires, then they moved on the the Wii, and now my mom plays my PS3 ,( just PSN games)
 
This. It was completely clear. There will be no streaming full games on PS4. Their goal is to make every single Playstation game playable on any device in the future. The OS and PSN things Gaikai are helping working on will be on PS4. Did anyone pay attention?

of course not. everyone was too busy writing snarky comments on GAF/Twitter/Facebook/etc...
 
The event also talked a lot about the PlayStation 4′s cloud services –downloading back catalog games, playing them from the cloud, sharing games between devices, even having friends log in and watch you play, or take over the controller. Is that out of the box? And will all those services be tucked behind PlayStation Plus, where users have to pay for them?

I think it’s aspirational on the device, as opposed to us standing up there, pounding the floor and saying the day this thing ships all this stuff will be there. I think it’ll absolutely be there for the device, but I don’t know whether it will be there for day one on the device. I think a lot of these are things that we’re gonna do over time. And with that said, I think there will be a tangible example of all the things that we showed. It’s just a question of how deep it will go, how many games it will involve.

Ugh. I almost forgot about Sony's Home presentation; it never came to fruition. The above quote is troubling
 
background updating

I think that'll be there from the off. It's kind of there already in Vita. The only bit missing on Vita is background firmware installation - but app and game patches and other things download and install automatically*. And in PS4 they've put hardware in specifically to facilitate this while in the low power state, so it would be weird to go to all that effort without having the software ready in tandem.

* I should say, if you have Plus they do.
 
That's right. Aside from the controller, they didn't even show any actual hardware. Just a spec sheet.

Form > function in your eyes then? A black plastic box has nothing to do with anything. I don't know why people keep saying the form factor would've made the event a much bigger deal.

Gamasutra said it best:

Who was it for?

When you sit hundreds of people down in an enormous theatre and concuss them with massive screens and surround-sound, everyone expects an E3-style reveal. But the event began with Mark Cerny taking the stage to discuss tech specifications and architecture info in what distinctly felt like an information pitch for developers. As much as enthusiast readers love playing armchair spec-junkies, it set the tone: This presentation wasn't about making consumers want to buy a PS4 just yet. It was about selling people on the dream of one, the first salvo in an uphill culture war.

The aim, plump with physics-oriented tech demos, was clearly to convince developers they can make the kind of games they've always dreamed of -- so long as those dreams are primarily about more visual realism.

Source: Gamasutra.com

I honestly don't know why Gamasutra is so overlooked on Neogaf and people spout the crap that comes from Kotaku (and others of its ilk) ad nauseum.

If you look at the meeting as something for developers it was a resounding success. If you look at it from enthusiast press angle, it doesn't get you as many hits as you would like so it wasn't that great. If you look at it from a gamer's angle, if you weren't optimistic about the new machines going forward, I honestly don't know what to say.

With that being said, I really liked this Forbes interview. It's sad that more people didn't actually interview big names there and instead just post silly opinions on their blog sites.
 
Glad to see Jack giving reasonable answers, ones we can agree with.

Wish he had been more bold and admitted that he wanted to belittle smartphone "games" though. Cause I do.
 
What kind of answer is this?

Sony should really fire Jack Tretton.

Basically that presentation was a lie. He's not sure of anything. Every time he opens his mouth, there is a headline in there that doesn't sound good at all. Yesterday he said something stupid on AllThingsD's interview.

Shocking news, a console is going to be released with incomplete features, news at 10.

That's nothing new, and that's how gaming is. We have firmware updates now, so if something doesn't make it in on launch day, they can have an update a few months down the line (like Nintendo did with TVii).

As long as the core features of the console is there, playing games, I'm cool with them upgrading the software down the line.
 
Form > function in your eyes then? A black plastic box has nothing to do with anything. I don't know why people keep saying the form factor would've made the event a much bigger deal.

Gamasutra said it best:



Source: Gamasutra.com

I honestly don't know why Gamasutra is so overlooked on Neogaf and people spout the crap that comes from Kotaku (and others of its ilk) ad nauseum.

If you look at the meeting as something for developers it was a resounding success. If you look at it from enthusiast press angle, it doesn't get you as many hits as you would like so it wasn't that great. If you look at it from a gamer's angle, if you weren't optimistic about the new machines going forward, I honestly don't know what to say.

With that being said, I really liked this Forbes interview. It's sad that more people didn't actually interview big names there and instead just post silly opinions on their blog sites.

Excellent point. Cerny reiterated this point over and over again.
 
We all started as casual gamers at some point. The more people who will try gaming the more hardcore people there will be.

Agreed. But the glaring assumption that many people make using this logic is that 'hardcore' will constitute the same thing tomorrow as it does today. And that's a mistake. The perception of 'hardcore' has changed dramatically throughout the years, from behaviors to the sort of tiles 'hardcores' focus on.

EDIT: Also, people have this assumption that their journey as a gamer - the progression from when they first began, through stepping stone genres and franchises, until finally reaching where they currently are - is the natural one. That anyone who hasn't followed the same path or reached the same point is less mature or even childish, or is trapped in views from the past that are no longer valid.

And that's idiotic. Everyone's journey started somewhere different; the stepping stones were distinct; and where each ends up will be somewhat or even dramatically different as well.

For example, you may have started out as a casual gamer and eventually found your way to being a fan of Nintendo or Uncharted or WRPGs. But that doesn't mean those are natural destinations for casual gamers today.
 
I was clearly talking about the next generation of consoles that I don't believe will exist, not present day.

Regardless, Watch Dogs is going to make a drop in the bucket for its publisher compared to what the top selling and F2P iOS games make. Clash of Clans and some other game are making $15,000,000 a month for Supercell.

If I am running EA or Activision, I am investing a whole lot of money in those and not big budget titles that come out and are so front loaded they die after two weeks, like Watch Dogs almost certainly will as it's not a Nintendo IP or Call of Duty.

You're comparing the largest iOS game to a game that hasn't even been released released yet. That 15m/mo in revenue sounds like a lot, but when you compare it to COD, it pails in comparison. Black Ops II made a billion in revenue in 2 weeks. MW3 did that same. That 180m Supercell made in a year is a rounding error to someone like activision.
 
What are you saying?

Sony hyped this event up to be the next Apple unveiling of home consoles.

He has a right to be disappointed.

Your posts are consistently amusing. And what hyping are you talking about? Three YouTube videos, some tweets and one bought of proper advertising on a football match banner? That's hardly Sony hyping it to be an Apple event.

Most reasonable people expected a teaser. We got more than that. And like 99% of people in the Playstation Meeting thread predicted, the price nor release date were mentioned.
 
But I’ve always said a rising tide lifts all boats. And if people are driven to gaming then that creates more opportunity for PlayStation. If people are all of the sudden drifting away from gaming in any way shape or form, that’s a bigger threat than a dedicated system coming from another manufacturer.

Well stated.
 
They were actually very clear on what was and wasn't day1, I'm not sure how so many people are confused.
 
I really like Tretton, and was kind of disappointed he didn't get stagetime last Wednesday. Especially since he's the one who had to pull Sony through quite a lot of terrible E3's.

Here's to hoping he can rise to glory this E3 when they officially present the console.
 
Makes sense.

None of us suddenly woke up one day and declare 'Oh my god from this day onward I will be a core gamer'. All of us started as a casual gamer.

For myself, I started playing game with contra. (Yes, it's not really that casual by any means but yeah) =D

I really like Tretton, and was kind of disappointed he didn't get stagetime last Wednesday. Especially since he's the one who had to pull Sony through quite a lot of terrible E3's.

Here's to hoping he can rise to glory this E3 when they officially present the console.

Let's face it. he's not really a good presenter.
 
They were actually very clear on what was and wasn't day1, I'm not sure how so many people are confused.

People were busy posting kaz gif's to watch the event. I watched the Cerny presentation again, and as aristotle pointed it, it pretty much was a conference for developers. Why else would they show tech demos with millions of particles. The core and casual crowd really couldn't care about any of that. They just wannna see how good the games will look on the new system, when it's coming out, and how much it would cost.
 
Yup. I might be, well, not biased, but I think it's hard for anyone to imagine this statement being true who takes a subway to work. I've seen people of so many different demographics playing Temple Run it's just incredible. I want to use the term "unprecedented" but it's possible I haven't on the planet long enough to use it in this instance.

So bad news for Vita/3DS, but that has nothing to do with what consumers want to do in front of their tv on a couch. None of those people would have been playing PS2 on the Subway on their way to work.

I fail to understand why people think your Average Joe playing Temple Run is going to hurt the PS4, that logic makes no sense whatsoever.
 
So bad news for Vita/3DS, but that has nothing to do with what consumers want to do in front of their tv on a couch. None of those people would have been playing PS2 on the Subway on their way to work.

I fail to understand why people think your Average Joe playing Temple Run is going to hurt the PS4, that logic makes no sense whatsoever.

Yes, exactly.
 
Mobile Gamers are a potential source of revenue for Sony, and they should embrace this. Sounds like they kind of are, which is good.

Since they are embracing F2P and Freemium games more publicly this time around with the PS4, no reason something like this shouldn't happen: Buy Temple Run 2 on the PS4, and you can play it, but you can also access it on your Android device or iOS device (or even Windows Phone 8 Device!) when you're away from home and play it, and earn PSN trophies and go on the PSN Leaderboard or what not.

This is on top of the usual PS4 games.

I imagine that Microsoft will do something similar, since "Xbox Live" is going across all 3 platforms (Windows 8, Windows Phone 8, and NextBox)

Now of course, Temple Run 2 already exists, but I'm just using that as an example.
 
Let's face it. he's not really a good presenter.

Well, quite aside from anything like that, this was a global event, not a SCEA event. They chose to do it in NY, but that was it. Tretton is a regional head, the right people did the presenting.
 
Jackie boy has had more than enough time to become accustomed to the new age of the CEO: Salesman #1.

He is an honest, friendly guy.. But he is a terrible salesman.

I hate to say it, but I really think it's time for Jack to go.
 
Some fantastic ideas but, as ever, I fear some of the features/services will take a long time coming or lack something in their implementation.

Don't let me down Sony!
 
What are you saying?

Sony hyped this event up to be the next Apple unveiling of home consoles.

He has a right to be disappointed.

LOL at you sir. LOL at you.

Jackie boy has had more than enough time to become accustomed to the new age of the CEO: Salesman #1.

He is an honest, friendly guy.. But he is a terrible salesman.

I hate to say it, but I really think it's time for Jack to go.


Lol at you too. He is participating in an interview, not a televised commercial.
 
You're comparing the largest iOS game to a game that hasn't even been released released yet. That 15m/mo in revenue sounds like a lot, but when you compare it to COD, it pails in comparison. Black Ops II made a billion in revenue in 2 weeks. MW3 did that same. That 180m Supercell made in a year is a rounding error to someone like activision.

Ubisoft sold 12 million copies of Assassin's Creed 3 already, despite it been one of the buggiest games in recent memory. You can see why they're investing in Watch Dogs instead of iOS games.

http://www.edge-online.com/news/ass...2-million-as-ubisoft-posts-bumper-financials/
 
What are you saying?

Sony hyped this event up to be the next Apple unveiling of home consoles.

He has a right to be disappointed.

They showed a few youtube videos, tweets, and a ad for a football game. If anything we got more then we thought if look at past Playstation meetings besides the actual hardware.
 
He also dodged the question about what entertainment features it offers over ps3

Ironically I think gakai like cloud tech is what will make mobile / dongle a real threat to consoles as we know them.
 
They showed a few youtube videos, tweets, and a ad for a football game. If anything we got more then we thought if look at past Playstation meetings besides the actual hardware.

I expected to see the controller and the console, and some trailers. That's it. I didn't expect them to discuss the architecture, Gaikai integration, or some of the social features. I assumed that'd be saved for e3. I left shocked that they even gave a release date to be honest.
 
So bad news for Vita/3DS, but that has nothing to do with what consumers want to do in front of their tv on a couch. None of those people would have been playing PS2 on the Subway on their way to work.

I fail to understand why people think your Average Joe playing Temple Run is going to hurt the PS4, that logic makes no sense whatsoever.

It's an industry trend. But if you're right then console gaming must be on an upward trend, since developers are at peak comfort with this gen's technology and the most visually stunning games of the generation are currently getting produced, right?

No huge gutting of studios? Healthy sales of consoles and games?

I'm not saying Temple Run itself is going to hurt the PS4. I'm saying it represents a trend that didn't exist at the start of last gen that Sony did not address sufficiently in this presentation. It focused on horsepower, and there is tangible evidence that the consumer at large is less concerned with higher fidelity game experiences pushed to the max.
 
I really don't understand the backlash on the mobile games comment. He's spot on about the content (Uncharted vs App) & with the PS4/Gaiki/Vita streaming it's just as good of an option with better content - for the gamer.

Obviously size and 99 cent apps are a little more portable/quicker to play, not to mention having all of that on your phone, so there are obvious attractions to both sides, but it's Sony's way of competing in that area
 
One of the few higher-ups in the industry that not only "gets" it, but also cares/respects the core gamers that ultimately got them (and him) to where they are today.
 
Realllllllly doubt it.
Think he probably means in the long term, at the end of the day. I also doubt it, but if it were proven otherwise, I wouldn't exactly be surprised, either. Gaming is becoming a bigger mainstream/accepted thing, so no matter where it is creates more gamers, that's still more gamers. There's always that chance of someone who came in one way eventually discovering and then getting off on something else entirely. Think he sees it as a sort of long term gate way drug.

Interesting notion but without evidence to back it up it's just that.
 
It's an industry trend. But if you're right then console gaming must be on an upward trend, since developers are at peak comfort with this gen's technology and the most visually stunning games of the generation are currently getting produced, right?

No huge gutting of studios? Healthy sales of consoles and games?

Don't be silly. It's a cyclical industry, and we're at the tail end of the cycle. If the PS4 and 720 don't sell well then you can start arguing it's because of Temple Run.
 
David Ewalt: I’ll start with the question everybody’s asking: When do we actually get to see the console?

Jack Tretton: You know, that’s really interesting. I’ve heard that from multiple reporters and shame on me that I didn’t see that as a big issue.
Me and Jack think alike.
 
Agreed.



I've only had an iphone for a month, but this is exactly how I feel. Nothing is grabbing me so far and the majority of apps, especially the most popular ones, feel like cash ins. Too many developers have flocked to the platform to make a quick buck. It like a giant bubble waiting to pop.

yeah this isn't really thought out

Did you stop using safari and all the other apps? does touch not work well in the OS ?

I feel like people are still coming to grips with touch controls and still have a lot of room to grow

if the ds can provide such a substantial experience and quality of games with one single input then why can't we do it with multitouch?

were just now seeing the emergence of standardized assumed touch controls that genuinely work(temple run is a gold example)

not saying the games are great but I am saying they are getting better and if touch controls work so fantastically in the OS then those conventions should and will be translate into gaming

but that's just me
 
It's complementary. I think I might give up handheld games for smartphone games (I won't, but I could), but I wouldn't give up Halo for Nova. Ever. But I might play both.

I completely agree that it's complementary, as Jack said it's additive. I still play games on my iPad and phone sometimes, but no way in hell will I switch over to them as the bullshit media tends to constantly claim.
 
I'm really looking forward to seeing how the PS3 sells once they drop the price. The PS2 was a monster when it hit $199 and that was 10 years ago.
 
Top Bottom