• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Franchises that took a few entries to reach greatness

The Witcher

TW1 - 8/10
TW2 - 9/10
TW3 - 1000/10
 
Devil_May_Cry_3_boxshot.jpg


After two awful entries they finally released a good game.

You have got to be shitting me.

Dmc1 was just amazing, and the best on the series.

I'm gonna say Killzone. Kz1 was a fluke, while Kz2 was the best fps last gen.
 
Everyone talks about how great Mega Man 2 is - and I agree that it's a classic but to me Mega Man didn't become great until part 4. This is when the charge shot mega buster gameplay mechanic became a thing. There was just something very satisfying about the risk/reward of charging and landing a well timed shot.

Megaman4_box.jpg

While I don't necessarily agree on the charge shot (I found it to be broken), and I think MM2 and 3 are excellent games as well, MM4 is my personal fav as well. Loved the Robother Masters and the soundtrack so much.

Another good choice is Mega Man IV for Gameboy. The first three games for the system were all rather unremarkable but then IV came out and it was great. Easily up there with the NES games.
 
I played DMC1 for the first time this year, even after playing Bayonetta 1 and 2.

Sure it's lacking in finesse and is a bit simple, but it has an excellent, really creepy atmosphere, and in some regards I think the simplicity works in its favour to make a straight, down-and-dirty game.
 
This is a really good one.

Final Fantasy is another. FF1, FF2, and FF3 are all fairly mediocre games, with FF1 being the only truly enjoyable of the lot (IMO). It wasn't until FF4 that the series really began to pave out its identity as a narratively driven RPG that changed its gameplay gimmicks with each entry.

I think that the Nes FF3 is much better than FF1. FF2 is weird and I wasn't a big fan. FF1 is aight.
 
I'll avoid stuff like Street Fighter, Streets of Rage, Assassin's Creed and the like, as I feel there are countless easy picking for games that took of with the first major sequel.

Yep.

If we count those, then Uncharted.

Otherwise GTAIII is the perfect example.

MGS..not sure. mg2:ss was a great game.
 
This may be iffy, but I'm inclined to say Mario Brothers. 1 is obviously great and helped bring gaming on the map, but I don't think it was till 3 or SMW to some till we saw just how awesome Super Mario Brothers could be.

Controversial pick....but I can see your point. IMO it was with 2 that showed how great it could be. That feeling of exploration and adventure would show up later with Mario 64, Sunshine and the Galaxy series.

GTA 3, Street Fighter II, Diablo II, Super Metroid, Streets of Rage 2

My pick is GTA. 1 was ok. 2, never played it.

Final Fantasy I was okay
Final Fantasy II was iffy/not good
Final Fantasy III was quite the mixed bag

And then FFIV came along...

Agree with this too. This got better and Phantasy Star got worse.


One was already great to me, 2 was a misstep. The ship righted itself for awhile starting with ALttP. But I can agree with this.

And someone saying MGS? The franchise was great from Metal Gear to me. Solid just took it to another level.
 
They never grew up with PS2.

Anyone worth a lick knows that DMC was the SHIT when it first came out.

What are you going on about, I definitely grew up with the PS2 in my teens. But I'll be honest and say I had never heard about DMC until 3, so I assumed that the first two were just very niche. 1 is not garbage like 2, but I couldn't really get into it when I was playing the series, it just felt really clunky. Maybe that's the price for having played 3 before.
 
This may be iffy, but I'm inclined to say Mario Brothers. 1 is obviously great and helped bring gaming on the map, but I don't think it was till 3 or SMW to some till we saw just how awesome Super Mario Brothers could be.

It is kinda iffy because SMB1 is a solid game, but you're right that 3 and World were a whoooole 'nother level.


For a more niche answer to this thread, the Rune Factory series (Harvest Moon spinoff) was somewhat meh for RF1 and 2. Then RF3 and 4 were much more polished and a lot more fun to play
 
What are you going on about, I definitely grew up with the PS2 in my teens. But I'll be honest and say I had never heard about DMC until 3, so I assumed that the first two were just very niche.

I don't know how that's possible. DMC1 was a big deal, it was the game (along with Silent Hill 2 a few weeks earlier) that kicked off the legendary PS2 Fall 2001 that people love to post that image of.
 
I think this is probably the majority of video game series. I think a more interesting thread would be games that launched with their best title and weren't able to recapture or exceed that greatness in any of the sequels.

I personally can't think of any franchises where that was the case unless you consider Chrono Trigger/Cross a franchise.
 
Persona

The series didn't hit acclaimed success until 3.

This is a good pick. I think my first one was the first Persona, and if I recall correctly, you spend about 90% of the game as a polygon dot on a stick walking around a polygon city or high school or something. It was pretty shit. Battle system was neat though.

I'd also argue Fire Emblem, though I haven't played any of the earliest entries. Also I'm sure some people don't like the casualized waifu stuff in the most recent 2 games, but I still feel like the series has gotten better over time.
 
Devil May Cry with 3.

1 was a good game and has the historical value of being the first in the genre as we know it, 2 was garbo, 3 is where the modern action game and the top tier of them come from.

This is the only example I've seen in this thread I can agree with. DMC1 was good at best, it's filled with rough edges (ex: those first-person sections), with much of its inflated reputation coming from an excellent release window. DMC3 was an amazing step forward for the series, a legitimately deep, excellent game. The initial US release was botched, unfortunately, but that's not the actual first version of the game so it's unfair to hold that against it.

(I disagree that "Stylish Hard Action" is actually a separate, distinct genre rather than Capcom Japanese marketing -- it's a 3D beat-em-up and takes all of its mechanics from similar earlier games -- but I'm probably in the minority on this and that's okay.)

Most of the examples in this thread feel like an age issue more than anything else. Nothing wrong with being younger, obviously, but series like Fallout, Metal Gear, Zelda, Final Fantasy, and Metroid were incredibly beloved and influential from the start. You personally coming to them late doesn't change that.

And protip for some posters: "a few" nearly always means 3-4.
 
Dmc1 was just amazing, and the best on the series.
You must not have played it recently. It's not only the worst game in its series, it belongs on the bottom of the genre.
-Awful water sections, clunky combat, fixed camera which messes up your control during fights, repeated boss fights, Nightmare, awful back tracking, and for an action game the final boss was a star fox 64 level.

A good game with way worse enemy design and atmosphere than its progenitor.

Give me the "inferior" enemy designs and atmosphere over the garbage that is DMC 1.
 
Castlevania 1 and 2 were ok games. Gameboy versions were not so good. We had to wait till Castlevania 3 for the series to reach greatness.




I'm gonna say Killzone. Kz1 was a fluke, while Kz2 was the best fps last gen.

Killzone 1 had the best offline multiplayer of any FPS game back then. Two players could team up and fight against bots. This option was dropped in the sequels
 
Project Diva kind of has this going on. The first game was badly designed and hella rough, while 2nd completely overhauled the whole thing. Then they really started stepping up their charting game in Extend, the third game. Then everything fell into place and we were blessed with F.
 
For me personally Halo didn't become really good until 3. CE lacked online (on consoles), and the campaign's level design left a lot to be desired, with a lot of backtracking and corridors. 2 was a fairly significant improvement but the gunplay felt sort of off to me for some reason.
just threw up in my mouth a lil bit
 
I'd have to go with the Souls series, but this is just my opinion because I know a lot of people swear by the first games. I did not like Demon's Souls and didn't like Dark Souls 1 or 2. However I absolutely loved Bloodborne and Dark Souls 3.
 
The Elder Scrolls.

Like, whatever one's opinion as to how well the series has gone from one title to the next after its jump to 3D, its pretty undeniable that there are reasons that most of the fan debate over which is the best game in the series start with Morrowind. Namely, in that what comes before Morrowind... wasn't exactly great, and is actually kinda hard to revisit with just how substantially the franchise formula has been improved since.
 
Monster Hunter. Funnily enough (because it's been mentioned a lot in this thread), I had my first taste of MH with a free demo disc that came with Devil May Cry 3. I thought it was pretty meh. The series has come a long way since those dark days.
 
Some of these opinions.... man.

Devil May Cry 1 is easily my #1 game ever released in the PS2 Library.
 
These threads are fantastic for highlighting posters that have either terrible taste or no fucking clue what they're talking about.
 
The shade towards other people's opinions in this thread is hilarious.
 
Top Bottom