• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Franchises with 5+ titles that are now dead?

Police Quest, King's Quest, Space Quest, Leisure Suit Larry, etc.

A damn shame really.
Oh boy... Those games were practically my childhood. Some of the first games that got me into being fan of both series of games and the developer, Sierra.

King's Quest is being resurrected by TellTale though.
 
MYST.

Arguably THE forgotten work of art in the industry. The number of times that Myst and Riven get mentioned in a month on GAF is sad.

The original masterpieces:
MYST
Riven

The disappointing sequels:
Myst III: Exile
Myst IV: Revelations
Myst V: End of Ages

The disastrous experiment:
URU: Ages Beyond Myst

And then of course RealMYST, the various URU reincarnations, the portable ports...

I happened to buy the DS port of MYST. By far my worst purchase in my 45+ DS games' collection..

the port was bad itself but the game was kind of lame as well, I can understand it being awesome back in the year it was made, like many point-n-click games of the early 90s but it has aged terribly and it is slow, clunky, raw, etc.
 
MYST.

Arguably THE forgotten work of art in the industry. The number of times that Myst and Riven get mentioned in a month on GAF is sad.

The original masterpieces:
MYST
Riven

The disappointing sequels:
Myst III: Exile
Myst IV: Revelations
Myst V: End of Ages

The disastrous experiment:
URU: Ages Beyond Myst

And then of course RealMYST, the various URU reincarnations, the portable ports...

I didn't think 3, 4, and 5 were THAT bad.

Riven is still pretty much the masterpiece of the series, though. So much detail, and so much subtle learning to absorb in order to understand the logic by which this new world operates.

I'd love to see a realRIVEN on CryEngine 3 on next-gen consoles.
 
Poor Grandia. In my perfect world, that battle system would be the one that RPGs rip off when they can't think of anything interesting.
 
EA's <sport> Street
Burnout
Killzone
Wing Commander
Sierra Quest games
PGR (MSR would be the first)
MMORPG
Tenchu
Fatal Frame
Jaws
Epyx sports games
TBA Konami Action Game
Quake
 
Call of Duty.

larryn9e0esvmk.gif
 
Lots of RPGs. (Not even digging deep for these three)

Wild Arms.

Suikoden.

Breath of Fire.

I shed a tear. Also, Grandia and Valkyrie Profile almost made it to the 5 game count (if we count the PSP port as a separate entry!) for this kind of list :(

Yes yes, new Suikoden but it's not the same sense as I-V proper were! It doesn't count!
 
I feel that a lot of the replies in this thread are really poor.

- They're either completely inaccurate (with the only intention to make some HURR HURR THIS SERIES IS DEAD TO ME joke)

- or they are poorly researched (Suikoden has a new game coming out next month in Japan)

- or they fail to understand the point the OP by suggesting series which continue to exist today but in very different forms than the original incarnations (Shining Force)

- or they don't really qualify (Ivalice Alliance only has 3 actual games - FFTA2, FFXIIRW, and FFT WotL, the branding was created post-FFXII, and hence cannot include FFXII or the games by Matsuno before it. Compilation of FFVII only has 3 games - Before Crisis, Dirge of Cerberus, and Crisis Core. The other products are not games, and if you want to count the non-games, the branding still exists, and a brand new novel is coming out shortly about the Turks.)

The point the OP is making is an interesting and good one. He is saying that after there is significant investment in an IP as a franchise (5+ games), it becomes very unlikely that the entire IP goes away completely. Even if there is no real practical value in the IP, or no one wants to make the sort of games the IP used to contain, somewhere and somehow businessmen in suits see value in mining IPs (either ones they own or ones gained from purchasing dead companies) as opposed to spending the same amount of money to fund brand new original games.

I think this point would be better represented if there are less lame/inaccurate/dumb contributions in this thread. :)
 
I think that this thread would work better, if some rules are set when it comes to defining "dead".

Like, someone not liking a game or losing interest or something ,doesn't mean that said game/franchise is dead. Halo? Same game that in 2010 did over 4 million copies in the US, that had an Anniversary remake of the first game just a few months ago and that will see the release of Halo 4 this holiday season...is dead?

Or even something like Crash; which yeah is not as "big" as it once was; yet the 2008 game (Mind Over Mutant) was quite good, and the developer (Radical) was working on a sequel, but seems to be focused mostly now on Prototype 2; so guess that they'll jump to Crash or something after.

EDIT:
Meh, beaten by duckroll..with a more eloquent post. :p
 
I think that this thread would work better, if some rules are set when it comes to defining "dead".

Like, someone not liking a game or losing interest or something ,doesn't mean that said game/franchise is dead. Halo? Same game that in 2010 did over 4 million copies in the US, that had an Anniversary remake of the first game just a few months ago and that will see the release of Halo 4 this holiday season...is dead?


Or even something like Crash; which yeah is not as "big" as it once was; yet the 2008 game (Mind Over Mutant) was quite good, and the developer (Radical) was working on a sequel, but seems to be focused mostly now on Prototype 2; so guess that they'll jump to Crash or something after.

Maybe franchises that have not seen a title since the turn of the millennium?
 
- or they are poorly researched (Suikoden has a new game coming out next month in Japan)

Doesn't count for the same reason you cite for Ivalice Alliance!
Even if the Shining Force example disproves this one too

To be serious, Wild Arms as far as I can tell is basically dead, Grandia is most likely done, Breath of Fire doesn't seem like it's going to make a return; I still hold out for Valkyrie Profile: Hrist but I'm not sure why.

How do we count Xenogears/Xenosaga?
 
SOCOM: US Navy SEALs.

Stabbed itself with Socom 3.

Dug a hole with Socom Confrontation.

Buried itself with Socom 4.

Pronounced dead by plainr_.
 
First thing that came to mind, is the NFL Gameday series. It used to be a competitor to Madden, before EA's exclusivity deal.

Police Quest, King's Quest, Space Quest, Leisure Suit Larry, etc.

A damn shame really.
LSL is not dead. They made some inferior non-Lowe versions, but the franchise isn't dead.

Al Lowe is actually onboard, to do an HD remake of the first game, and possibly the others. There's even talk of new original LSL games to be made, in the future.

Here's the GAF thread on this.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=448048
 
Maybe franchises that have not seen a title since the turn of the millennium?
Probably, or just "generations"; ike Viewtiful Joe.
Though it is kinda hard to find a game that had 5 sequels and right now been completely dead. There are a few like Dino Crisis or Onimusha that were well known back then, got 2+ sequels and nothing else.

Heck, even Duke Nukem Forever took ..well, forever to be released made it last year and there has been talks already about new games/reboots/whatever.
 
The PSP game was like 2 years ago, Move Heroes was last year and the HD collection is coming soon.

I don't see a return to glory for J&D, but the franchise ain't dead.

I love the series, too, but a collection and a couple characters in a Move game don't a continuous series make.

In fact, your post only cemented the time since the franchise was killed: 2 years.



Fucking ouch.

I don't understand how hard it is to start the franchise back up.
 
I feel that a lot of the replies in this thread are really poor.

I think this point would be better represented if there are less lame/inaccurate/dumb contributions in this thread. :)

I think it would help if the OP mentioned or defined what "dead" really meant. There has to be a specific time span allocated to really define something as dead in this case. I mean just because we haven't had a specific game from a franchise doesn't mean we won't in the future, which is what people seem to be assuming. For example, Metroid isn't dead by any stretch of the imagination because we've had Hunters, Trilogy and Other M. However, that being said we haven't really had a game similar to Fusion well since Fusion. Does this qualify as being dead? I don't really truly believe that's the case.

Something I would probably say call dead... old NES games that we haven't seen for 20 years. Crystalis anyone? Even more recent things like Skies of Arcadia. Even this is just questionable though because while we probably won't see another installment of that game you never really know.

That being said I have a really hard time thinking about franchises with 5 or more entires that haven't had some sort of attention even recently.
 
I love the series, too, but a collection and a couple characters in a Move game don't a continuous series make.

In fact, your post only cemented the time since the franchise was killed: 2 years.

Yeah but you can't possibly believe HD releases are meant to satisfy nostalgic past players? I think the reason behind most HD releases is to create a new fan base on top of the existing one to allow for gamers to understand future titles.

Team ICO Collection comes out to get people excited for The Guardian, for example.
 
Gradius

- yes, i know it got the Wiiware games a while back and it got a pachinko game too, but i still wake up in a cold sweat sometimes fist shaking at Ken Kutaragi and his "and Capcom are busy making Gradius 6 for PS3" annoucement.
 
For all intents and purposes, Suikoden. Though it has some spin-offs, the mainline story hasn't been touched since, what, 2004? 2005?

Which is a total bummer.

(The DS game and the recently-announced PSP games don't count)
 
Dark Forces/Jedi Knight and Tie Fighter/X-Wing series, sadly.
KOTOR, the Lego Games, and Force Unleashed just aren't the same. I needs me some Kyle Katarn and stories that take place after the original trilogy.
 
It wasn't five games (3 + spin-off) but Descent. That series was BIG back in the day. One of the top PC franchises. Now it's not just that they stopped making them, but nobody cares. The only one people care about is the sequel to the spin-off (Freespace 2).

Also: PGR if you count MSR, which I would.
 
Gradius

- yes, i know it got the Wiiware games a while back and it got a pachinko game too, but i still wake up in a cold sweat sometimes fist shaking at Ken Kutaragi and his "and Capcom are busy making Gradius 6 for PS3" annoucement.

Wiiware game is relatively new.
I don't really see a point in making a new one unless its by Treasure (the Otomedius team looks pretty terrible)
Gradius V ftw
 
I think it would help if the OP mentioned or defined what "dead" really meant. There has to be a specific time span allocated to really define something as dead in this case. I mean just because we haven't had a specific game from a franchise doesn't mean we won't in the future, which is what people seem to be assuming. For example, Metroid isn't dead by any stretch of the imagination because we've had Hunters, Trilogy and Other M. However, that being said we haven't really had a game similar to Fusion well since Fusion. Does this qualify as being dead? I don't really truly believe that's the case

Something I would probably say call dead... old NES games that we haven't seen for 20 years. Crystalis anyone? Even more recent things like Skies of Arcadia. Even this is just questionable though because while we probably won't see another installment of that game you never really know.

That being said I have a really hard time thinking about franchises with 5 or more entires that haven't had some sort of attention even recently.

I agree, there should be some sort of definition for dead, or at the very least "still currently dormant". I think a good measure would be say, 5-6 years (about one full generation) since the last release any of any actual game product in relation to that franchise. But I think we should also include all platforms and all types of releases to remove bias. If an IP has been revived for a Facebook game, or a licensed mobile title, I believe it should count as well, since it shows that the franchise is actually being used, even if it is in a way where the original fans might not care for.

The original point was that Silent Hill would probably be unearthed at some point in the future even if Konami decides to stop making more products immediately after March 2012. So I think that can be a good frame of reference. Silent Hill is hardly a series which continues to cater to the original core fans (or arguably any fans at all), and one of the titles being released is a HD Collection re-release, and another is a Diablo-clone on the Vita. Hardly traditional Silent Hill games.
 
Top Bottom