I can't believe anyone likes it. Looks incredibly artificial, because it is.
Makes movies look like HBO documentaries about the making of the movie. Its like avocado to me. I cant understand how anyone could like it.
I can't believe anyone likes it. Looks incredibly artificial, because it is.
MotionFlow, motion smoothing is a complete joke and whenever someone tells me differently I lose respect. They have zero knowledge of the technology and are a bonehead consumer at that point. Its addition to modern television sets only serves as a platform for pushing more 'features' down unsuspecting and gullible consumers throats.
Same with 3D.
There is no known cure for 24fps Stockholm Syndrome.
60fps is great, just need to get used to looking at it. But this motion flow or whatever they call it now is bullshit as it makes it look terrible fake. Can't believe the industry hasn't moved away from shitty 24fps, guess people have become too stuck with the "it's cinematic" line of thinking.
They're "stuck" in it because it's truth. 60fps is just plain video. I want to see a movie about James Bond chasing the bad guy through exotic streets, not a home video of Daniel Craig running after some dude on YouTube, which is what 60fps will look like.
Higher frame rate only equates to a better experience in videogames. Film is 24fps. Deal with it.
They're "stuck" in it because it's truth. 60fps is just plain video. I want to see a movie about James Bond chasing the bad guy through exotic streets, not a home video of Daniel Craig running after some dude on YouTube, which is what 60fps will look like.
Higher frame rate only equates to a better experience in videogames. Film is 24fps. Deal with it.
Hate it for most things other than sports. It's really good for sports.
Yeah my dad didn't even know it was turned on. He was like "What are you talking about?" and I said "Your TV... you don't... see that? ech." And then when they weren't looking I turned it off and he still doesn't know.
It's like when you go to the theatre and the projectionist has the wrong lens for anamorphic on the set, and everyone's head on-screen looks like a football, and no one notices, and you feel like you are taking crazy pills. Some folks just... don't notice some shit at all. It's rather remarkable.
If you put it side-by-side, identical picture, only then would they say "Oh yeahhhh.... I guess".
average consumer loves motion interpolation, massive edge enhancement, and the picture set to vivid with whites insanely blown out and the colors teetering on blue.
in the context of the hobbit it does
My TV is natively 120Hz, and I think it's fine.
The TV's that use post-processing techniques (motion smoothing I guess) to "guess" frames suck shit.
Makes movies look like HBO documentaries about the making of the movie. Its like avocado to me. I cant understand how anyone could like it.
Ok. Show me an interpolated frame grab.
How about I just provide one for you:
![]()
You are telling me that this looks "nothing like a genuine frame"
Where are you viewing 120fps footage shot and played back on a 120fps projector? I think I"m probably one of the few people who have actually seen this is real life.
You know. If you weren't being so rude, you might actually realize that I can offer a fairly unique perspective on this.
Where have you seen 120fps filmed content?
I'm talking something shot at 120th of a second and played back at that speed.
It is a totally jarring effect. It's unnatural looking and weird....and you can achieve it completely with a 40 dollar roll of 16mm film and an expensive camera.
It's not the interpolation. It's the weird frame rate.
They're "stuck" in it because it's truth. 60fps is just plain video. I want to see a movie about James Bond chasing the bad guy through exotic streets, not a home video of Daniel Craig running after some dude on YouTube, which is what 60fps will look like.
Higher frame rate only equates to a better experience in videogames. Film is 24fps. Deal with it.
THIS! Its really weird but it makes every movie seem so fake to me. Rather than the movie being a believable world I feel like I'm on set watching actors in make up pretend to be someone else. Obviously, this is what a movie really is but motion smoothing destroys any illusion or fantasy that I might have watching a film.
This, you should watch things as intended by the creator not by some gimmick On a hypocritical note i actually enjoy the 2d to 3d conversion for some movies.Motion smoothing turned Batman Begins into the comedy of the year for me. Seeing Christian Bale in a giant bat costume with that level of clarity really drove home just how ridiculous things must look on film sets during production, and just how critical the atmosphere that gets injected during post production is.
Motion smoothing turned Batman Begins into the comedy of the year for me. Seeing Christian Bale in a giant bat costume with that level of clarity really drove home just how ridiculous things must look on film sets during production, and just how critical the atmosphere that gets injected during post production is.
Yeah really love having only 1 of 4 frames being actual frames and 3 of 4 being made up by the tv. Seen som weird artifacts because of that function. People gaming with it is the worst. The input lag is horrible.
But I´m spreading the word and all my friends now hate it too. I just had to point out the artifacts so the noticed them.
Isn't The Hobbit like the first movie to be shot in 48fps? How can you say it's better when it's not even out yet?Movies shot at 60fps>Movies shot at 48fps>Movies shot at 24fps>Movies shot at 24fps and motion interpolated to 120Hz
I personally like the smoothing effect because I think it looks more lifelike. People don't move at 24 frames per second, so why should films?
Do you want to actually explain what is actually happening with interpolation?
You are talking about 2 images taken a 24th of a second apart.
The only time I've actually seen it breakdown was at the beginning of Saving Private Ryan. That was shot at a ridiculously high frame rate, but cut down to 24fps.
Here is an example of what happens with super high shutter speed film run though motion interpolation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spnPUORGMak
You can see that the original footage is "over cranked".
Whoa. That is just plain wrong. Don't you remember the many many demo reels 3Dfx used to run showing stuttery as fuck 30fps vs 60fps? These were not games, they were side by side demos of framerate.
Rent Saving Private Ryan. Watch the first 10 minutes. That headache inducing stutter you are seeing is a complete lack of motion blur. That's 24fps film shot at 500th of a second for each frame. Each image is razor sharp.
24fps. However, they have a 1/24 shutter speed to gain an extra stop of light and create a more 'video' look, along with increased gain. The same was done for Miami Vice.At what framerate were "Collateral" and "Public Enemies" captured? I know they were recorded with digital cameras but they also seem much more fluid than other movies.
Motion smoothing looks bad because it's artificial. Your TVs processor can't do as good a job at creating images than an actual camera filming the action. This has been explained again and again in this thread.Are you all really certain that motion smoothing really causes the effect of things looking cheap, or do you equate the cheap look with TV shows that are cheap and use the high frame rate? If we grew up with movies at high frame rates, I think many of you would all have a different opinion about these things.
24 fps movies are too similar to slideshows in action movies. I prefer smoother video because it looks more like real life. At first, I thought the motion smoothing looked odd, but now I think it makes me even more involved in the movie or TV show.
Motion smoothing looks bad because it's artificial. Your TVs processor can't do as good a job at creating images than an actual camera filming the action. This has been explained again and again in this thread.
I like the look of faster frame rates. They're not worse than 24fps, just different.
Because films aren't supposed to be real. Your logic also argues against colour grading or shallow DOF*, after all...I personally like the smoothing effect because I think it looks more lifelike. People don't move at 24 frames per second, so why should films?
Go read a book then. All this complaining about more FPS (not talking about interpolation artifacts) is no different than people complaining about color tv.Because films aren't supposed to be real. Your logic also argues against colour grading or shallow DOF*, after all...
Go read a book then. All this complaining about more FPS (not talking about interpolation artifacts) is no different than people complaining about color tv.