You might want to unknot those knickers mate.
This is what I was referring to:
"It has always been our intention to release the relevant source code for the open source emulators used within RetroN 5. We have not been as quick as we could have been, since we have been busy improving the RetroN 5 user experience. The relevant source code has now been released. From this point forward we will not only keep our copy of this code updated for those who wish to obtain the latest version, but also submit patches for any fixes that we implement back to the original projects so that the entire community may benefit. Hyperkin will continue to endeavor to fulfill the licenses of any project used within RetroN 5 and any other software we write."
http://www.nintendolife.com/news/20...infringing_on_the_rights_of_emulator_creators
"Back to the original projects"
That is admitting guilt in my book.
And my comparison is perfectly apt and suitable. If you choose to ignore it, good for you.
Way to prove my point. This isnt at all what we are talking about. We are talking about the retron 5 selling code whose gpl license forbids commercial use.
Your compariosn is poor, as is your comprehension of the situation. SUPPORTING THE RETRON 5 IS SUPPORTING THEFT.