That's not what I'm saying at all, neither did I include that with the particular ads I was talking about - for a reason (and yes, I understand they're relevant to Halo in this case). I wasn't trying to absolve him of anything. I'm trying to go beyond this particular instance where they do correlate and instead to when they often don't.
Sorry if you thought I was going that deep into it, I'm not. I was simply commenting on what the picture shows, which is what Garnett was talking about and my reference from what Jeff was saying. As stated above, I'm not trying to absolve him of anything. I think their point is more broad and not as specific to this as their using it as a jumping off point; I could be wrong though.
The point I'm taking away from this being that they don't/won't always and that ads like those (which often relate to people who play games, see: snack foods, soda, junk food, viagra, etc.) are the ones outlets like these should, or rather ideally would, like to go after to give them their needed funds but still show impartiality.
edit: lol I get that is kind of convoluted