OP makes thread, breaks rule right in the first post.I know, but I still paid $40 for it when I got it, LOL.
I really do not think Bloodborne is worth 60$ you can finish the game it self in like less than 3 hours not even being a professional speed runner.
Maybe 6 if you count the extra bosses. Game is very light on content.
Witcher 3 on the other hand is worth it, and Xenoblade Chronicles X.
I really do not think Bloodborne is worth 60$ you can finish the game it self in like less than 3 hours not even being a professional speed runner.
Maybe 6 if you count the extra bosses. Game is very light on content.
Witcher 3 on the other hand is worth it, and Xenoblade Chronicles X.
What a silly argument. If you play the game absolutely perfectly, know where everything is and the fastest way to beat the game and skip half of the content, you can beat the game in 3 hours. You could say the same thing about a lot of games. It took me over 40 hours the first time, and I've played through it 3 times now. I've spent well over 100 hours playing Bloodborne, theres plenty of content.
Uhhh.... I'd say you're the exception there.
![]()
Witcher 3
Super Mario Maker
Bloodborne
Xenoblade Chronicles X