• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

GamesTM 64 (UK) Review Scores (Mario Galaxy etc!)

Dante said:
How are all these unknown mags getting MG scores before the big publications/sites??



For the same reasons you'll see all these 10/10 scores on Gamerankings and you've never heard of most of the publications.

They don't play the games in their entirety, or review based on their expectation of quality.
 
needlejuice said:
I take it that it's still not known here, that the Editor exercised his muscle over the actual score that the person who reveiwed SGM awarded the game.

There are some very strange allegations floating around that the game was given a 10 (as the review would strongly suggest), but the Editor changed the score to 9. For reasons unknown...

The hate versus Nintendo never stops.

Speevy said:
For the same reasons you'll see all these 10/10 scores on Gamerankings and you've never heard of most of the publications.

They don't play the games in their entirety, or review based on their expectation of quality.

This says all. What a crown of morons.
 
Dante said:
How are all these unknown mags getting MG scores before the big publications/sites??

For fuck sake.

Games TM is one of the largest British gaming magazines, with a very decent reputation.

I believe they have very similar readership levels to that of EDGE.
 
Web has been given an embargo by Nintendo to allow a near full print cycle to review the game. Sites with reviews up now probably haven't played the full game- certainly without Nintendo's permission
 
Dante said:
How are all these unknown mags getting MG scores before the big publications/sites??

This isn't an unknown mag.

They also have an exclusive visit and interview with Rare in this very same issue.
 
Wow. This makes me embarrassed to have a mario'ised avatar. You guys bitching about the 9 saying they didn't play it properly, or the magazine is a joke... I am at a loss for words. Absolutely unbelievable.
 
Mar_ said:
Wow. This makes me embarrassed to have a mario'ised avatar. You guys bitching about the 9 saying they didn't play it properly, or the magazine is a joke... I am at a loss for words. Absolutely unbelievable.

This shouldn't be suprising to anyone. It's a typical GAF fashion to string up anybody who dares not to give their holy game anything but a perfect score. Wait until the inevitable 8.5 (or *gasp* an 8) to see the real witch hunt. That will be an entertaining thread to see which poster crosses the line of complete mental breakdown to the land of bantopia.
 
I live in the U.S. (LA to be exact) and I read Games TM all the time at Barnes/Borders. Surprised many of you Europeans haven't heard of it.

Despite Galaxy being my most anticipated game so far, I'm not going to cry if it gets sub 10 scores. Recently I've learned that it's best for me to play the game myself, because sometimes I find myself agreeing with the people who scored the game lower than what I thought was proper.
 
needlejuice said:
I take it that it's still not known here, that the Editor exercised his muscle over the actual score that the person who reveiwed SGM awarded the game.

There are some very strange allegations floating around that the game was given a 10 (as the review would strongly suggest), but the Editor changed the score to 9. For reasons unknown...

I'll need to read the review first hand. This sounds interesting. The only thing I can think of for the lowering of the score is that maybe the review didn't look at the game too critically or that it wasn't a groundbreaking experience like what was found with Mario 64(the whole going to 3d from 2d thing). Basically too much praising without raising any of its faults. Lets face it, no game will be perfect and if a game has some faults, they need to be addressed. I've read Games TM reviews before and they are always very critical of each game they review. They tell the bad and good parts of it. That's why I like reading their reviews(same with Edge).
 
Mar_ said:
Wow. This makes me embarrassed to have a mario'ised avatar. You guys bitching about the 9 saying they didn't play it properly, or the magazine is a joke... I am at a loss for words. Absolutely unbelievable.

9's are fine in my book, but an 8 or less from a major site or magazine will be a huge slap to Nintendo fans all over the world (and GAF)
 
rhino4evr said:
9's are fine in my book, but an 8 or less from a major site or magazine will be a huge slap to Nintendo fans all over the world (and GAF)

Thats nice. I'm sure journalists all over the world are now *rushing* to ensure that they don't slap you in the face with a 7. Or something.
 
Guys, Bioshock didn't get a ten from everywhere, Portal didn't get a ten everywhere, HL2:Ep. 2 didn't get a 10 everywhere, Halo 3 didn't get a ten everywhere- Super Mario Galaxy will NOT get a ten everywhere. It just won't. Hell, like those games, it won't even get a ten from a majority of sites. Why on Earth you people seem to expect everyone's opinion to magically agree for this one game is beyond me.
 
traveler said:
Guys, Bioshock didn't get a ten from everywhere, Portal didn't get a ten everywhere, HL2:Ep. 2 didn't get a 10 everywhere, Halo 3 didn't get a ten everywhere- Super Mario Galaxy will NOT get a ten everywhere. It just won't. Hell, like those games, it won't even get a ten from a majority of sites. Why on Earth you people seem to expect everyone's opinion to magically agree for this one game is beyond me.

why on Earth people deem it necessary to even make an issue over a phenomenal score like '9' is also beyond me. It's the Twilight Princess effect... anticipated wait for so long, anything less than perfect is a failure for their idealized viewpoint of the best Nintendo games.

Regardless of what you consider perfect, I again say, Super Mario Galaxy is a PURE JOY MACHINE. It does not matter what gets GOTY, or what gets 10. When you play the game, scores are irrelevant as your smile grows larger and larger on your face and you realize how much fucking fun you're having. It is what you play games for.
 
Amir0x said:
why on Earth people deem it necessary to even make an issue over a phenomenal score like '9' is also beyond me. It's the Twilight Princess effect... anticipated wait for so long, anything less than perfect is a failure for their idealized viewpoint of the best Nintendo games.

Regardless of what you consider perfect, I again say, Super Mario Galaxy is a PURE JOY MACHINE. It does not matter what gets GOTY, or what gets 10. When you play the game, scores are irrelevant as your smile grows larger and larger on your face and you realize how much fucking fun you're having. It is what you play games for.

Don't bring your logic 'round these parts!
 
traveler said:
Guys, Bioshock didn't get a ten from everywhere, Portal didn't get a ten everywhere, HL2:Ep. 2 didn't get a 10 everywhere, Halo 3 didn't get a ten everywhere- Super Mario Galaxy will NOT get a ten everywhere. It just won't. Hell, like those games, it won't even get a ten from a majority of sites. Why on Earth you people seem to expect everyone's opinion to magically agree for this one game is beyond me.
People are waiting for the next Ocarina of Time, but I don't think we'll see such unanimous critical praise for a game EVER again. I don't find that to be a bad thing, either.
 
Also, for anyone saying Games TM is Nintendo biased:

Wikipedia said:
Reviewed games are given an overall score marked out of 10. Although several games have received 9/10, five games – Metroid Prime, Burnout 3, Gears of War , God of War II and Bioshock - have achieved a 10/10 score in the magazine's history.
 
voodoojohn said:
People are waiting for the next Ocarina of Time, but I don't think we'll see such unanimous critical praise for a game EVER again. I don't find that to be a bad thing, either.

And whats so great about not having that shinning beacon of gaming greatness that we can all unite together under in harmony?
 
voodoojohn said:
People are waiting for the next Ocarina of Time, but I don't think we'll see such unanimous critical praise for a game EVER again.

Yes, this IS what all the review score whores are wanting. Cynically speaking (lol), the reviewers are so aware of the score hype that OOT Impact is unlikely to ever happen again.

But then again, weren't Metroid Prime and RE4 "unanimously critically praised"?
 
I think what GAF should do is just ban all reviews. They're so broken and pointless today, its so sad to see them anymore tbh.

Anyone with me? Ban reviews.
 
Roders5 said:
From wiki:

Metroid Prime I agree with, Burnout 3 I definitely don't agree with, and Bioshock I don't agree with. I haven't played God of War 2 or Gears of War yet so I can't comment on that.
 
McBradders said:
This is going to ruffle some feathers. The Ratchet/Conan saga continues!

What saga?

Gamerankings.com (based on 35 reviews)

R&C:Tools of Destruction
PS3

90.7%
 
PixelJunk Racers 8?
PES 2008 - 7? Fifa 08 - 8?
R&C5 - 6?

Are these guys on crack or what? And as someone who's played a lot of both, PES pisses all over FIFA. The only better thing about FIFA is that it's easier to pick up and play. In other words it's more n00b friendly, but ultimately it's no where near as deep or rewarding.

GamesTM = Joke

They are a small time mag with minimal sales and minimal impact in the UK gaming mag scene. They are that cheap small and thin mag you pick up when you don't have money for the others. Trying to be stylistic and high and mighty like EDGE but failing miserably.
 
is it...Ive lived in the UK...been into gaming for prob 20 years, and never heard of them

huh? i've lived in Japan for the last 7.5 years and i'm more than aware of GamesTM.

the reactions to review scores on GAF are becoming my regular source of comedy.

"THEY DIDN'T GIVE <GAME> THE SCORE I THINK IT SHOULD GET!?! *MAGAZINE RACK HOLOCAUST!*"
 
Thunderbear said:
What saga?

Gamerankings.com (based on 35 reviews)

R&C:Tools of Destruction
PS3

90.7%

I agree

but it only takes 1 fucked up review like this one that brings down that score dramatically

and then we have to put up with " ps3 still has no AAA games" shit.
 
Mar_ said:
Wow. This makes me embarrassed to have a mario'ised avatar. You guys bitching about the 9 saying they didn't play it properly, or the magazine is a joke... I am at a loss for words. Absolutely unbelievable.


You're... suprised?!?! This shit's hilariously inevitable...

ORANGE BOX AS GOOD AS GALAXY!?!?! WHAT DOES THIS MEAN!!?!?!?!?!

Crazy kids...
 
I've lived in Japan since 2000, and even I'm aware of gamesTM. I've even bought a couple of issues when visiting back home (I seem to remember a silver cover and Auto Modellista artwork?). It's a decent mag, but just because they give R&C a rank score, they get mud slung at them? Hive behaviour at its best.
 
Jonnyram said:
I've lived in Japan since 2000, and even I'm aware of gamesTM. I've even bought a couple of issues when visiting back home (I seem to remember a silver cover and Auto Modellista artwork?). It's a decent mag, but just because they give R&C a rank score, they get mud slung at them? Hive behaviour at its best.

I'm not even looking at the R&C score. Take a peek at the FIFA/PES scores then come back and try to call hive behaviour.
 
Kyoufu said:
I'm not even looking at the R&C score. Take a peek at the FIFA/PES scores then come back and try to call hive behaviour.

Word is, Fifa this year is actually a huge improvement.
 
Ruud_Luiten said:
it is.. I find Games TM even better than EDGE

.

nib95 said:
GamesTM = Joke

They are a small time mag with minimal sales and minimal impact in the UK gaming mag scene. They are that cheap small and thin mag you pick up when you don't have money for the others. Trying to be stylistic and high and mighty like EDGE but failing miserably.

Then maybe you are the joke, since GamesTM is same format and price as Edge and also 180 pages thick (and thats damn thick).
 
Take a peek at the FIFA/PES scores then come back and try to call hive behaviour.

huh? All the reports of the new PES from anyone whose opinion i actually trust are that the game has a ton of issues, and more importantly that the game hasn't advanced that much yet AGAIN.

The more "SORT IT OUT" messages that get sent to Konami , the better.
 
DCharlie said:
the reactions to review scores on GAF are becoming my regular source of comedy.

"THEY DIDN'T GIVE <GAME> THE SCORE I THINK IT SHOULD GET!?! *MAGAZINE RACK HOLOCAUST!*"

I bet the reviewers do not even know how to write an article. :lol :lol :lol
 
nib95 said:
PixelJunk Racers 8?
PES 2008 - 7? Fifa 08 - 8?
R&C5 - 6?

Are these guys on crack or what? And as someone who's played a lot of both, PES pisses all over FIFA. The only better thing about FIFA is that it's easier to pick up and play. In other words it's more n00b friendly, but ultimately it's no where near as deep or rewarding.

GamesTM = Joke

They are a small time mag with minimal sales and minimal impact in the UK gaming mag scene. They are that cheap small and thin mag you pick up when you don't have money for the others. Trying to be stylistic and high and mighty like EDGE but failing miserably.

So much wrong with this particular post its difficult to know where to start...
 
And where's the damn text for the Mario Galaxy review. Hurry up you lazy jerks!
 
Top Bottom