smurfx said:
smurfx said:
beerbelly said:Well, fuck! If MS shows off Gears of War 2 then everything else will be forgotten![]()
beerbelly said:Well, fuck! If MS shows off Gears of War 2 then everything else will be forgotten![]()
Mojovonio said:......
i just, i dunno....
its just so amazing
DiatribeEQ said:Had Microsoft launched the 360 with a built in HD-DVD player, we might not be talking about how the HD-DVD format is now officially on the way out, now would we?
DiatribeEQ said:Had Microsoft launched the 360 with a built in HD-DVD player, we might not be talking about how the HD-DVD format is now officially on the way out, now would we?
If MS launched 360 with HD-DVD player built in, both platforms could be on the way out about now instead of just one. 360's success was contingent on it's timely "early" launch. If it's launched later, it wouldn't have been as successful and wouldn't have a development leg up on PS3. HD-DVD would have delay the launch and raised the price. A double whammy.DiatribeEQ said:Had Microsoft launched the 360 with a built in HD-DVD player, we might not be talking about how the HD-DVD format is now officially on the way out, now would we?
Shogmaster said:If MS launched 360 with HD-DVD player built in, both platforms could be on the way out about now instead of just one. 360's success was contingent on it's timely "early" launch. If it's launched later, it wouldn't have been as successful and wouldn't have a development leg up on PS3. HD-DVD would have delay the launch and raised the price. A double whammy.
DopeyFish said:Not only that, but would have added unnecessary problems to 360, like longer loading times
phez said:Looking back, would an increase in the 360's price stopped you from buying the console? If not at launch, but eventually? This just spills over into a completely different arguement (see '360 vs ps3 game library') ... but based on that, I do agree that HDDVD would have had an advantage if it were originally bundled. Not to mention getting HDMI from the start![]()
neojubei said:Don't play lost Odyssey.
Bingo, Microsoft and Toshiba could have killed 2 birds with one stone with this strategy.
harSon said:What exactly was the point of this statement? :lol
Dunlop said:One aspect that most are missing is that the PS3 is the cheapest BluRay player at $399.
$399 <> Mass adoption.
HD-DVD had made things interesting with the sub $200 players that would have inevitably forced BD to release cheaper players. Now, there is no incentive. So it will be a while longer before we see mass adoption.
Also say good by to the endless BOGO sales for BD (or at least the frequency of them)
Still gonna have to get a PS3 this year now....bastards![]()
In Nov 2005, HD-DVD was not ready nor the more mature HDMI versions. To incorporate them, 360 would have launched about 6 months or more later. That would have negated all the advantages of an early launch. HD-DVD built in simply was not an option back then.phez said:Looking back, would an increase in the 360's price stopped you from buying the console? If not at launch, but eventually? This just spills over into a completely different arguement (see '360 vs ps3 game library') ... but based on that, I do agree that HDDVD would have had an advantage if it were originally bundled. Not to mention getting HDMI from the start![]()
Shogmaster said:In Nov 2005, HD-DVD was not ready nor the more mature HDMI versions. To incorporate them, 360 would have launched about 6 months or more later. That would have negated all the advantages of an early launch. HD-DVD built in simply was not an option back then.
Look, every sane person knew going in that all HD-DVD meant to MS was a monkeywrench to Sony, end o story. They knew there was incredibly small chance of HD-DVD actually winning over BR and was never a goal. Fast forward to today, their HD-DVD support did it's job. PS3 is in distant 3rd place in the biggest market and no where near 1st place in the other two markets.
Toshiba for their part got not much out of the deal, but they really have to take most of the blame. For instance, putting their best titles on that fucking asnine and more expensive Combo disc format was beyond retarded. Folks bought their HD-DVD players to play HD-DVD, not DVDs. NO ONE GIVES A SHIT that there is a DVD version on side B! It's as if they were saying to the consumer "we ain't exactly confident about this thing so here's a DVD version just in case it don't work out. Sorry but we have to have you pay for it too." Stupid.
Either way, none of this matters much to the failure that is PS3. People already have been buying PS3 as the cheapest BR player. PS3 was suppose to bolster BR, not the other way around. If BR happens to take off to the levels of DVD did back in 1999, say in couple of years from now, PS3 would be beyond saving anyways.
Shogmaster said:Look, every sane person knew going in that all HD-DVD meant to MS was a monkeywrench to Sony, end o story. They knew there was incredibly small chance of HD-DVD actually winning over BR and was never a goal. Fast forward to today, their HD-DVD support did it's job. PS3 is in distant 3rd place in the biggest market and no where near 1st place in the other two markets.
Gadfly said:DX10 was never a major selling point for Vista. Vista's main audience is not a few hardcore PC gamers.
Shogmaster said:Yeah. They could be sharing the pathetic NPD numbers with Sony every month. What are you fucking retarded?
PrivateWHudson said:Also, MS was not blindsided by Warner's announcement. How long ago they found out about this is unknown, but they have known before today that this was going to happen.
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lolShogmaster said:Yeah. They could be sharing the pathetic NPD numbers with Sony every month. What are you fucking retarded?
Steroyd said:I'm positive Microsoft were trying to sell Vista as a gaming OS.
segarr said:Microsoft's fear of standing toe to toe with Sony cost them big now. Blu-ray will propel the ps3's sales past the 360's now that the format war is over.
smurfx said:
WickedAngel said::lol
Do you really believe what you're posting or are you just doing it for shits 'n giggles?
m0dus said:It's like I've traveled back in time to summer 2006 and there are still people who think (or maybe just *hope*) that a blu-ray drive is the singular key to a system's success? Also, The Nintendo Revolution to have touchpad support and VR goggles. you heard it here FIRST.
Joking aside, I think the mistake people seem to be making is assuming that backing HD-DVD was as pivotal to MS's platform as backing BRD is to Sony's. The answer is no, it isn't. Not even the same ballpark. MS's support of HD-DVD was so utterly half-assed that you'd really have to be blind (good lord, the wireless CONTROLLERS for the 360 have gotten more adspace and airtime than the HD-DVD addon.) It has been stated and restated, their HD medium of choice is digital downloads and xbox-live. Yet people make that leap in logic to equate the success or failure of either BRD or HD-DVD with that of said Console platforms.Threads then erupt in an orgy of outlandish comments and backhanded replies, and a little piece of me dies inside. Every. Fucking. Week.
m0dus said:Be careful--you are now equating GAF rumor and conjecture with reported facts. It would not be wise to hold MS responsible for not making an imaginary announcement. You will make the unicorns angry at the magic snot fairies. And then shit'll really be on.
Gadfly said:I never heard from them there will be a big announcement. Have you?
BillG is giving a keynote and I believe it's still on.
m0dus said:Dude, you're LIVING it as we speak.
You and 5-6 other people.ddk said:Personally I'd like to see a 360 Ultimate that had 120GB HDD, wireless out of the box as well as a combo BluRay/HDDVD drive in it. If they could do that for $700-$800 it'd get me to buy a 3rd 360 day one.