Paracelsus
Member
Calisthenics, running is good mostly if you want to build stamina. Dieting if you're the type genetically structured the wrong way won't work at all, you can starve to death and still have a fat belly.
Does Wheat/Whole grain bread count? I have switched from white bread to whole grain bread like two weeks ago. It didn't seem to be as tasty as white bread, but I don't notice a huge difference now.
I have the same problem. How do you lower body fat without significantly reducing your muscle mass?
What about biking in lieu of running?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Eh still tires me out. Lately though I've hit the running plateau finally after 6 weeks so it's not too tiring (I run outside btw). But I only feel better after the run not during...Running is great fun if you have the right song on.
Also if there are treadmills in a row and the girl in front of you has a fine rear.
Yah you gotta run OP. I started running 6 weeks ago and I still hate it. Does anyone even enjoy running?
The no carb crew has arrived. Try running 10 miles with no carbs, ridiculous suggestion.
Is it possible to cut while at the same time tone your self out?
Jump rope is good cardio right?
Considerably better than running and it's less stressing on your tendons.
Not at all. Actually it's endurance sports that work best with ketones as energy. You may have had a case if you chose strength training...
God damn this thread is full of terrible bullshit. Just go to the FitGAF OT7 and stop fucking around if you seriously want to get into shape.
Are ankle weights + running a good suggestion, as well?
lol so true. Im surprised no one called out the most obvious bullshit post in this thread. What do people get out of lying on neogaf?
No, it is hard on connective tissue and will cause health issues over time. Sore knees, ankles, etc. Run without weights; if you want to make it harder, run faster. If you want to get a fit, muscled body, lift weights.
In fact, lifting weights is generally better than cardio not only for gaining muscle but for losing fat, and should always be the priority unless you are training for a sport.
Endurance sports do not work well with low carb diets, as shown by studies on high level cyclists. Low carb is good if you don't plan on a lot of strenuous activity, but is suboptimal for fueling physical activity. Basically don't eat more carbs than you need... Or more of anything else other than protein which is pretty tough to get too much of.
Steroids. I'm not even kidding.I have the same problem. How do you lower body fat without significantly reducing your muscle mass?
This thread really is horrible. I don't recall seeing one person offering advice making the effort to find out some important info about the OP before trying to provide either generic or personal advice which is based on their specific experience in what worked for them. The truth is, you need to know a lot of detailed information about how the op obtained his lean body mass and body fat, how the op reacts to different types of food and exercise, and his current body composition including age and other factors to provide any kind of advice. The advice also needs to include the stipulation that any strategy needs to be flexible enough with enough observation to adjust on about a weekly basis based on your individual body's reaction to the methods used.
There are other ways without compromising and using steroids.Steroids. I'm not even kidding.
That's just plain false, actually.
You should start by looking up Dr. Peter Attia. He's got a cool blog over at http://EatingAcademy.com
Aerobic athletes that become fat-adapted can often find improvements in performance.
It's the anaerobic sports that seem to pose problems without large glycogen stores. There are individuals who report good success, though.
There are still way too many unknowns about the op.Context is everything, of course, and personalized recommendations are best, but I don't think that means there isn't advice that can be given in general.
Great, one dude against the dozens upon dozens I know who use carbs to fuel marathon runs.
You don't want to starve yourself when you're that active. That's not sustainable.
In fact, lifting weights is generally better than cardio not only for gaining muscle but for losing fat, and should always be the priority unless you are training for a sport.
Is this guy as legit as he sounds? I like the stuff he says. Sounds plausible.
Yours,
Franck
I'd say he's closer to right than wrong, since most people take "calorie-restriction" to mean near-starvation level diets, and "cardio," to mean torture on the treadmill.
That almost inevitably means failure and rebounding after a certain amount of time spent being absolutely miserable. You're not gaining any muscle on a regime like that, either, and less muscle mass correlates with being less healthy.
Nonsense. Calorie restriction combined with bouts of increased heart rate isn't unhealthy, whether people take that to mean "near-starvation" is their own retarded outlook. You lose fat with a caloric deficit. As someone who used to be at 25% BF and now is 9%, I know.