NotTheGuyYouKill
Member
Well, no IMAX this time, but I hope to enjoy the movie. Me and my friend are going to a closer standard theater.
It's dissimilar from MI3 in one big way: it's fun.Watched this in an "XD" theater, the closest I have to an IMAX.It was what the trailers indicated: an above average action movie. If you're looking for interesting characters or an intriguing plot, look elsewhere. It is well-made though, but it does nothing new. It's not all that dissimilar from MI3.
It's dissimilar from MI3 in one big way: it's fun.
I find both fun. I find the action in MI4 better, but the narrative circumstances under which the action in MI3 happens more compelling.
I find both fun. I find the action in MI4 better, but the narrative circumstances under which the action in MI3 happens more compelling.
I find both fun. I find the action in MI4 better, but the narrative circumstances under which the action in MI3 happens more compelling.
Okay, I can agree with this somewhat. I like the menacing villain in MI3, and there are a couple of fun scenes like theI find both fun. I find the action in MI4 better, but the narrative circumstances under which the action in MI3 happens more compelling.
Didn't they say he was ex-KGB?
they gave away pretty much every scene of the movie in the trailers
They give away every scene in the opening credits, lolz. Didn't quite understand the point of that.
"we gon show you what's gonna happen and you STILL won't believe this shit happened" basically
btw how much imax content is in this movie?
eh
frankly this has been a really lame year for hollywood blockbusters. Uncharted 3's set pieces destroy anything I watched in an action movie this year. Haven't seen Tintin yet though.
They give away every scene in the opening credits, lolz. Didn't quite understand the point of that.
So is Cruise up for more MI movies? I had read somewhere that Jeremy Renner was supposed to take the reigns from him...
You better see that shit properly.
So is Cruise up for more MI movies? I had read somewhere that Jeremy Renner was supposed to take the reigns from him...
Are movie theaters open on Christmas tomorrow?
Thinking of going tomorrow with the family if so. There isn't any nudity or gore in the movie is there?
On top of my previous nitpicking, something new bothers me.
When Ethan is in car with the secretary and brad, he tells them the nuke launcher is missing and only tells them of the villain's involvement. Even Brad I think asks what's the villain gotta do with this when Ethan shows him the sketch on his hand. The secretary asks Ethan to go rogue b/c it seems like they have no lead but to blame the IMF team.
But then how did the USB drive the secretary hands it to Ethan have the villain's bio and his next meeting and all that crucial info?
Are movie theaters open on Christmas tomorrow?
Thinking of going tomorrow with the family if so. There isn't any nudity or gore in the movie is there?
Oh, those opening credits....uhm...why show that?
Yeah they sucked. It spoiled everything.
I took a secret day off from work and family and treated myself to a movie, so I have to admit I went in with completely low, completely forgiving expectations, but I thought it was a fun, meaningless action movie with some of the best suspense I've felt since Departed.
Forget dialogue, story, and character development. And don't get me started on the complete miscasting of Renner and the supposed comedy stylings of Cruise's see-through henchmen, but still -- this is exactly what I expect out of a modern action movie. Fun, fast, and just a touch of lulz and intrigue. I'll never watch it again, but I'm glad I did.
Edit: agreed w/above -- it felt a bit long for what it was actually delivering.
I find both fun. I find the action in MI4 better, but the narrative circumstances under which the action in MI3 happens more compelling.
Also LOVED that they never resorted to using the fucking face masks for cheap twists like MI3 did. I felt like the face masks always fucking up was a jab to how overused they were in the 3rd and 2nd.