Spiral Insanity
Banned
No, it really feels like a gimmick.
They are trying to attract couples who can't decide between the action flick and the chick- flick.
Basically a big budgetted version of those movies:
![]()
Here we go again.
No, it really feels like a gimmick.
They are trying to attract couples who can't decide between the action flick and the chick- flick.
Basically a big budgetted version of those movies:
![]()
I wonder what the overlap is of folks that defended the garbage fire that was Batman v Superman and folks that are hating this film just because of its existence.
Caroline Framke,vox.com
"Kate McKinnon is a goddamn star." (tweet)
Anya Crittenton,early screening viewer
"lots of fun, cast is excellent, Kate McKinnon will be the star to emerge from this film. (tweet)
No but Rick Marsian isIs Rick Moranis in this?
It's worth remember that the reviewer wasn't a fan of the original ghostbusters anyway.
Anyway, all the reviewer said is that *this* film introduces the viewer to a certain "rule of ghostbusting", and *this* film then breaks it's own rule. For him, that lack of consistency was a problem.
Have you seen the film?
A piece of fiction should still have it's own internal logic. ApparentlyNot obeying the rules and logic you introduced makes for shitty fiction.the proton packs in the reboot are introduced with the same rules at the original packs. They hold the ghosts with the intention of capturing them. That logic is tossed aside and the proton beams start killing the ghosts instead without an explanation.
A piece of fiction should still have it's own internal logic. ApparentlyNot obeying the rules and logic you introduced makes for shitty fiction.the proton packs in the reboot are introduced with the same rules at the original packs. They hold the ghosts with the intention of capturing them. That logic is tossed aside and the proton beams start killing the ghosts instead without an explanation.
The symbolism is obviousIt seems like it's easier to control the wands in this film than the original? In the original, the stream seemed stronger with the Ghostbusters just struggling a bit to hold onto their wands..........
My problem with this is that the fighting is much, much more dynamic then the original ever could do with everything being a practical effect of course. But the terrible CG and editing just... Ugh.
It seems like it's easier to control the wands in this film than the original? In the original, the stream seemed stronger with the Ghostbusters just struggling a bit to hold onto their wands..........
Jason Inman, geekhistorylesson.com
"It's better than Ghostbusters 2." (tweet)
Steve Zaragoza, Youtuber?
"Could have been worse." (tweet)
The reviewer is a foodblogger.
This feels like bizarroworld
AvatarI'm curious. Has there ever been any major film that had an incredibly negatively received trailer and pre-release publicity that wound up being critically acclaimed after it came out?
It's almost hilarious to me how many in-depth conversations I've been saying the past few days about the intricate logistics of ghostbusting. I guarantee the original filmmakers did not put that much thought into the logistics when they made the movie.
I'm curious. Has there ever been any major film that had an incredibly negatively received trailer and pre-release publicity that wound up being critically acclaimed after it came out?
Jason Inman, geekhistorylesson.com
"It's better than Ghostbusters 2." (tweet)
Steve Zaragoza, Youtuber?
"Could have been worse." (tweet)
Avatar
The CG looks very colorful and cartoony which makes it look a little weird when they interact with the live-action scenery. Those Scooby Doo movies did a lot of that.I wish this was more practical than the CG assault on my eyes that it is. I've been trying to remember what this movie reminds me of since the very first trailer and it's those live action Scooby Doo films.
I'm curious. Has there ever been any major film that had an incredibly negatively received trailer and pre-release publicity that wound up being critically acclaimed after it came out?
honestly do you think a finale where they just hold a ghost in place is any kind of finale. if all it takes is a little rule bending to have an epic battle finale then sobeit.
Well, the vast majority of filmgoers aren't critics anyway, so I don't think that invalidates his opinion at all.
That ending sounds really bad. The worst part is hearing that the leads don't demonstrate a lot of chemistry. That kneecaps a lot of team focused movies.
I remember when we laughed about Biogamergirl
Now we get our movie reviews from Wreckless Eating
Is this some eloborate performance art and I'm too dumb to get it?
I wonder what the overlap is of folks that defended the garbage fire that was Batman v Superman and folks that are hating this film just because of its existence.
Reddit for the last three months:
"Cut BvS some slack! Watch it again! Watch the three hour director's cut! It's actually a pretty good movie if you're in the right mindset!"
"This two minute trailer for Ghostbusters isn't great, let's all boycott it and talk for months about how we hate it and let's never ever give it a chance."