• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Giant Bomb Thread #5 - We love you, Ryan Davis

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dunno about them being labeled as an "Atlus site" really, but I agree with everything else. The Persona games are very character driven and that's actually why I like them a lot more than the mainline series myself.

The Atlus site comes from the fact that it seems like whenever Atlus releases a game tangentially related to SMT, fans demand that GB do everything up to an ER for it.

I believe they've gone on the record saying that they would specifically avoid Atlus games in the future for ERs so they wouldn't solely be "that site that does Atlus playthroughs".
 
A Quick Look is a lot different than an ER, and they had no problem doing one for P3P and even Devil Summoner 2.

I acknowledged that I was probably going to be wrong, but something about Jeff saying "No." point blank to a question about whether he was playing SMT4 makes me think that maybe they'll skip it.

I feel like it would have been a game that would have been passed off to Patrick.
 
Well it's not like they don't go in blind pretty often.

Also I doubt jeff right now is the type to play a fairly hardcore RPG on his own time.
 
They should avoid RPG quick looks if one of the crew is not already in to the game or at least interested in playing it.

If they pick it up during the tutorial then it makes for a boring half hour of footage. If they put time in to get to the main game then fans moan that they only showed the starter areas. Not every game needs to be covered.
 
jesus christ, that leisure suit larry quick look. that game is utterly insufferable.

I also think they're still trying to shake the reputation of being the "Atlus" site.

that's dumb. The risk of having that image stuck to them was years ago, but at this point, literally no one thinks of them that way.
 
I am a huge Larry fan, but the remake isn't great. It's worse than the previous remake and that wasn't great either.
Hell the first Larry was a remake of a text adventure from 1981.

I'm not holding out a lot of hope for this team being able to make a great new entry considering they didn't seem to take anything but an art style from the brilliance that was Larry 7...and that came out in 1996.

But it's better he's back to adventure games rather than the "Larry Lovage" series I guess. I just wish they'd not seemed to take such an uninspired way about things.

I still think there's a place for lowbrow comedy in gaming as there is in other forms of entertainment, but this remake doesn't do it well and certainly doesn't showcase why Larry stood out.
Keep in mind it was the top adventure game company of the time making these at a genre's peak, and even after Sierra were battling with Lucas, entries in the Larry series got a pass from reviewers that the Redneck Rampage's and Postal's over this world never did at the time - and there's a reason for that.
 
I think it's just a matter of the game not holding up.

My nostalgia made me fund the game on Kickstarter, but I can't be assed to actually play the game. Remembering that you have to gamble to make money to be able to do anything is enough to make me give up on the whole thing.

That said, the fact that they "fixed" the game so that it's not unwinnable now is at least admirable. But it's a game burdened by a two-decade old design, and short of completely rewriting the game, they did what they could with the money they had.
 
That Larry game looks terrible. I don't even mind the bad humor, what ever someone might enjoy it, but the gameplay is just so archaic. They really should have gone all the way and update the gameplay to modern adventure game standards.
 
It totally isn't going to happen, especially with that CAH guy - he doesn't understand the commitment and logistics involved.

Even using the words is going to rile up the ER crowd though. Borderline trolling them at this point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom