Draft said:Doesn't make you a dick, makes you a rational person. Putting free content behind a paywall is shitty. Doing after explicitly saying you wouldn't do such a thing is ultra shitty.
NIN90 said:I still fail to see a reason for the initial decision by WM to shorten the bombcast.
What's their goal?
They wanna save some bandwith? Really? When they have multiple sites with lots of video content?
They wanna save that 1 hour of work time for other stuff? This all doesn't make sense.
jett said:To entice people to subscribe to get the full podcast? It's not rocket science people.
Mkliner said:Because the higher ups decided 2 hours was to much time to waste on a podcast so instead of just getting rid of the second hour they made it an incentive to subscribe. Well at least that's what they were heavily implying on the explanation podcast.
NIN90 said:No, WM decided to cut 1 hour BEFORE this horrible get-the-full-bombcast-as-member idea.
Calcaneus said:Where the hell are you supposed to subscribe anyways?
NIN90 said:I still fail to see a reason for the initial decision by WM to shorten the bombcast.
What's their goal?
They wanna save some bandwith? Really? When they have multiple sites with lots of video content?
They wanna save that 1 hour of work time for other stuff? This all doesn't make sense.
V_Ben said:
Yeah, but the problem is that they don't make enough from people visiting the site. I found it funny when they said that one of the subscription perks is no ads. I'm struggling to find a single ad on the site right now.:lolNitrousoxide said:I've always looked at the Bombcast as being a loss leader. You don't make much money on it, but it drives loads of traffic to the site where you CAN make money.
Trying to make your loss leader profitable kinda defeats the whole purpose behind it.
Bare in mind there's a hell of a lot of GB visitors they make no money off. I have never seen an ad (as I live in the UK - their second biggest market) so the ads the US visitors see have to subsidise everyone and they obviously don't make ends meet atmNitrousoxide said:I've always looked at the Bombcast as being a loss leader. You don't make much money on it, but it drives loads of traffic to the site where you CAN make money.
Trying to make your loss leader profitable kinda defeats the whole purpose behind it.
It isn't shorter, I thought. They are still recording for 2 hours. They just cut it in half and release it over the course of two weeks. As they said on the podcast about subscribing, after the first week everyone gets two hours of content. Just one of those hours is from the previous week.yankeehater said:Yeah I dont see how money is saved by them cutting the Bombcast at 60 mins either. They are already in the room recording, what's another 60 minutes going to hurt? If WM was really pushing them to shorten the Bombcast to 1 hour, then they have no idea what they are doing. The only reason anyone goes to that site is the Bombcast, making it shorter is a terribly shortsighted idea.
So I signed up for the monthly, I'll see how useful the subscription actually is (disregarding the bombcast) before canceling.V_Ben said:
notworksafe said:It isn't shorter, I thought. They are still recording for 2 hours. They just cut it in half and release it over the course of two weeks. As they said on the podcast about subscribing, after the first week everyone gets two hours of content. Just one of those hours is from the previous week.
Haha I've never really noticed the ads on the site except the occasional big ones on the front page. I didn't pay 50$ to get the podcast early or get rid of ads, I did it because of all the entertainment over the past couple years.Ataturk said:Yeah, but the problem is that they don't make enough from people visiting the site. I found it funny when they said that one of the subscription perks is no ads. I'm struggling to find a single ad on the site right now.:lol
Sounds to me like people are still whining over a "short" Bombcast, which won't really be the case after the first week.NIN90 said:That's not what we are discussing.
Dynoro said:Bare in mind there's a hell of a lot of GB visitors they make no money off. I have never seen an ad (as I live in the UK - their second biggest market) so the ads the US visitors see have to subsidise everyone and they obviously don't make ends meet atm
notworksafe said:Sounds to me like people are still whining over a "short" Bombcast, which won't really be the case after the first week.
I'll be listening to the full Bombcast while wearing my WM t-shirt however, so I'm not too bothered.. :lol
ACE 1991 said:For all over people who bit the bullet, are HD videos simply not loading for you? They are not for me... Pretty disappointing considering I'm not paying for it.
I always wondered how GB actually survived until I found out US visitors got ads :lol If they did worldwide ads I'm sure they could probably get around the subscriptions (especially if they had a donate button too) - but I assume they looked into it and it wasn't feasible.jett said:They need to rework their ad stuff, or hire more ad-savvy people. I get plenty of "international" region-specific ads at other websites like Gametrailers for instance, but for me Giant Bomb is an ad-free experience.
NIN90 said:I'll explain it again:
I'm scratching my head why WM originally decided to shorten the bombcast by 1 hour (BEFORE the idea of paid members getting a full 2 hour bombcast)
What's their goal? Save bandwith? Nah. Save 1 hour a week on the production of their biggest draw? Hell nah.
Mkliner said:Don't be stupid they'll get to at least 4,754
So what you're saying is that they could free up a lot of time and effort by axing the obnoxious WiiWare and DSiWare segments?panda21 said:its not just 1 hour, Ryan spends a lot of time editing it.
I remember only ever seeing one ad, but inexplicably it was for Eat Sleep Pray with Julia Roberts. =(Dynoro said:I always wondered how GB actually survived until I found out US visitors got ads :lol If they did worldwide ads I'm sure they could probably get around the subscriptions (especially if they had a donate button too) - but I assume they looked into it and it wasn't feasible.
ACE 1991 said:For all over people who bit the bullet, are HD videos simply not loading for you? They are not for me... Pretty disappointing considering I'm not paying for it.
kenta said:So what you're saying is that they could free up a lot of time and effort by axing the obnoxious WiiWare and DSiWare segments?
I love the Bombcast but that crap wore out its welcome a long long time ago
No, it's not. News and releases is the free bit.stupei said:Which is basically the kind of stuff they are going to put into the "second hour" that everyone is freaking out over.
sdornan said:Just to note, Dave said in the chat when this was all first announced that they have a hard time getting ads because game publishers say, "Why do I want to advertise to the hardcore when they're going to buy it anyway?"
Which is true, for good content. It's hard to really argue that.
Well then they need to hire some better people because they wont be in business for to much longer if they cant monetize their content.sdornan said:Just to note, Dave said in the chat when this was all first announced that they have a hard time getting ads because game publishers say, "Why do I want to advertise to the hardcore when they're going to buy it anyway?"
Chopping previously free content in half to put it behind a pay wall is shitty, end of discussion.stupei said:Which is basically the kind of stuff they are going to put into the "second hour" that everyone is freaking out over.
Valru said:Chopping previously free content in half to put it behind a pay wall is shitty, end of discussion.
No you're right but it's still shitty.Bojanglez said:I thought it was still free but you wouldn't be able to get the second half of each show until the following week, or have I just misunderstood?
Which might as well be a permanent pay wall, just ask Revision 3.Bojanglez said:I thought it was still free but you wouldn't be able to get the second half of each show until the following week, or have I just misunderstood?
StuBurns said:No, it's not. News and releases is the free bit.
jett said:...they definitely need better ad-men. I don't see other gaming "hardcore" websites having problems putting ads out the ass.
stupei said:I also think they want to be very principled about the whole thing, as they've said. They don't want to promise to give any specific kind of coverage or content, they don't want to be beholden to the publishers in any way. I'm sure a lot of other sites don't just trade eyes in exchange for cash but also agreeing to write x number of previews or to cover y event. Giant Bomb has made it pretty clear they don't tend to make those kind of promises.
panda21 said:imo wiiware and dsiware with generalisimo Jeff and his multicultural gang of friends is the most important part of the bombcast
Yes.Backfoggen said:Are there actually any HD videos up yet?
I AM JOHN! said:Yes.