• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Gilad Shalit to be freed

Status
Not open for further replies.
i have followed the case for years, and obviously feel for gilad and his family, but this is the worst fucking trade ever in the history of bad trades.
 
Roi said:
Israeli man vandalizes Rabin memorial in protest of Shalit deal
Shvuel Schijveschuurder,who lost his parents and three of his siblings in 'Sbarro' terror attack, vandalizes memorial after discovering two of Palestinians responsible for the attack to be released as part of deal.

49168136.jpg
Why the fuck did they desecrate a Rabin memorial? Rabin had nothing to do with this and the Labor party is not in control of Israel.

I understand that guy is bitter but his target made little sense. Express your displeasure to Bibi and do it in a constructive manner.
 
Count Dookkake said:
Thread is short. Read it.


Ah my mistake I usually skip over usernames.



I don't know why anyone is surprised at the lopsided deal. This is how these prisoner swaps usually play out

I'm not optimistic about any of this moving the peace process along, besides deflecting from the Recognition movement in the UN it just buys both sides some popularity points. Israel will never budge on the 69 borders and 'right of return'.
 
xbhaskarx said:
I'm glad he's free but this probably sets a bad precedent... what's going to keep Hamas from doing it again?

Nothing. They will do it over and over and over because they know the Israelis will cave.
 
I'm truly shocked how little attention this topic seems to get here

If this was a thread about Israel farting in Gaza's direction, this thread would be a hundred pages by now
 
I can't help but feel that this will come back and bite them in the ass later in the form of more terror attacks by the murderers they're releasing.

I'm happy for Gilad to be home again soon. I'm happy for the innocent Palestinians as well, not so much for the convicted murderers.
 
I bet Shalit was treated better in Hamas custody than Pals in Israeli custody, as in he wasnt given the camp 1391 treatment.
I look forward to the next prisoner release, which includes a heavy amount of "administrative detainees and political activists"
 
xbhaskarx said:
Prisoner list includes planners of mass atrocities

Some really wonderful people are about to be set free.....

To be fair, I'd imagine a huge chunk of those 1000 prisoners are innocent, so it's probably balanced out. Not like Israeli's don't get away with atrocities or anything. Hell, they do pretty much every day. Hope the people who genuinely are responsible for atrocities get their dues on both sides.

Anyone know how many Palestinian prisoners Israel holds altogether?
 
nib95 said:
To be fair, I'd imagine a huge chunk of those 1000 prisoners are innocent, so it's probably balanced out. Not like Israeli's don't get away with atrocities or anything. Hell, they do pretty much every day.

Anyone know how many Palestinian prisoners Israel holds altogether?

Two wrongs don't make a right. That's what got them in this conflict in the first place.
 
nib95 said:
To be fair, I'd imagine a huge chunk of those 1000 prisoners are innocent, so it's probably balanced out. Not like Israeli's don't get away with atrocities or anything. Hell, they do pretty much every day. Hope the people who genuinely are responsible for atrocities get their dues on both sides.

Anyone know how many Palestinian prisoners Israel holds altogether?

To be fair, you like imagining that most of them are innocent and to be fair, you are pulling this out of your ass with like many of this board due, ambiguity.

Rather than criticizing the fact that there will be a mass celebration of murderers and collaborators who will be returned, in comes apologists and apathy of course.
 
D-Fens said:
Two wrongs don't make a right. That's what got them in this conflict in the first place.

Of course not. I agree with that whole heartedly. There is a weird imbalance at work though. One country commits acts of terror under the guise of military might which somehow makes it military intervention instead of terrorism, and the other does it with Guerilla tactics and suicide bombings which is the more obvious form of terrorism.

In these cases though, one mans freedom fighter is often another mans terrorist. Point is, they are as you mentioned both wrong. Just a shame only one side is taking any real heat for it.
 
Glad he is finally free.

Still sad that the French authorities didn't seem to do much to help his liberation. He didn't get but a fraction of the attention usually given to French hostages (granted his situation regarding both his nationality and prisoner status made this uneasy).

I'm on the fence about about the terrorists (among the 1027) being freed. Hard to swallow, especially seeing Ismaïl Haniyeh glowing with his newfound power.

I wish they'd released Bargouti.
 
People are looking at this the wrong way.

Forget the 1000 Vs 1 numerical imbalance. Forget the military imbalance. Forget the fact that both Israel and Palestine are probably never ever going to have a peace because neither side is willing to make serious movement to peace.

The simple thing is this:

There are now 1001 fewer reasons to be antagonistic towards each other. That is one minor flashpoint eliminated. I just hope that the 1001 freed people can go back to their respective families and maybe even attest to some of the nice qualities of the side that held them prisoner.
 
RandomVince said:
People are looking at this the wrong way.

Forget the 1000 Vs 1 numerical imbalance. Forget the military imbalance. Forget the fact that both Israel and Palestine are probably never ever going to have a peace because neither side is willing to make serious movement to peace.

The simple thing is this:

There are now 1001 fewer reasons to be antagonistic towards each other. That is one minor flashpoint eliminated. I just hope that the 1001 freed people can go back to their respective families and maybe even attest to some of the nice qualities of the side that held them prisoner.

That's very naive... you don't really believe this, right?
 
i know fuck all about israel. is there any good documentaries on the process leading up to the establishment of the state? who was there before, how populations shifted, etc etc?
 
ManDudeChild said:
You're aware this isn't the OWS thread right? I'm just trying to put your naive responses into some logical reason.

Mate, I dont even know what you mean by OWS. So whatever that is, I'm sure you've made a cutting point.

All I'm saying is that amongst all the released prisoners, maybe there will be some who become voices of moderation. Quelle horreur.
 
Seems like a bad deal for the Israelis.
Maybe they'll keep tabs on the most dangerous terrorists and arrest or kill them when its convenient?
Surely Israel wouldnt just leave their citizens at the mercy of so many known terrorists.
 
nib95 said:
To be fair, I'd imagine a huge chunk of those 1000 prisoners are innocent, so it's probably balanced out. Not like Israeli's don't get away with atrocities or anything. Hell, they do pretty much every day. Hope the people who genuinely are responsible for atrocities get their dues on both sides.

Anyone know how many Palestinian prisoners Israel holds altogether?

Couldn't find the source I read a while ago, but fwiw wiki:

wiki said:
[edit]Number of prisoners

According to the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, between the years after the Six Day War (1967) and the First Intifada (1988), more than 600,000 Palestinians were held in Israeli jails for a week or more.[2] Rory McCarthy, The Guardian's Jerusalem correspondent, estimated that one-fifth of the population has at one time been imprisoned since 1967.[3]
According to B'Tselem, there was a decline, starting in 1998, in the number of Palestinians held in administrative detention where, on average, less than 20 were held from 1999 to October 2001. However, with the start of the Second Intifada (2000), and particularly after Operation Defensive Shield (2002), the trend was reversed, and the numbers began to steadily climb.[4]
According to the Fédération Internationale des ligues des Droits de l'Homme (FIDH), from the beginning of the Second Intifada in 2000 through to April 2003, more than 28,000 Palestinians were incarcerated in prisons or prisoner camps. In April 2003 alone, there were more than 5,500 arrests.[5]
In 2007, the number of Palestinians under administrative detention averaged about 830 per month, including women and minors under the age of 18.[6] By March 2008, more than 8,400 Palestinians were held by Israeli civilian and military authorities, of which 5,148 were serving sentences, 2,167 were facing legal proceedings and 790 were under administrative detention, often without charge or knowledge of the suspicions against them.[7] In 2010, the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics reported that there were "over 7,000" Palestinians in Israeli jails, of them 264 under administrative detention.[8] The main prisons in which Palestinian prisoners apprehended by Israel are held are in the Ofer Prison in the West Bank and the Megiddo and Ketziot prisons in Israel.[7]
On 17 April 2008, the annual day of commemoration for Palestinian Prisoners, Adalah: The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, published a summary report of statistics noting that there were 11,000 Palestinian prisoners being held in prison and detention in Israel, including 98 women, 345 children, 50 members of the Palestinian Legislative Council, and 3 ministers of the Palestinian National Authority.[9] Of these 11,000 Palestinian prisoners, 8,456 were from the West Bank, 762 from the Gaza Strip, and 694 from within Israel itself (including 552 from Jerusalem).[9] In October 2008, Haaretz reported that there are 600 Palestinians being held in administrative detention in Israel, including "about 15 minors who do not know even know why they are being detained."[10]
[edit]Child prisoners
Between October 2000 and April 2009, approximately 6,700 Palestinian children between the ages of 12 and 18 were arrested by the Israeli authorities, according to Defence for Children International's Palestine Section (DCI/PS). The number of Palestinian children held in detention and interrogation centers, as well as prisons, both in Occupied Palestinian Territory and inside of Israel, was 423 in 2009. In April 2010 the number was 280. DCI/PS reports that these detentions stand in contravention of international law.[11]

See more here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_prisoners_in_Israel
 
RandomVince said:
Mate, I dont even know what you mean by OWS. So whatever that is, I'm sure you've made a cutting point.

All I'm saying is that amongst all the released prisoners, maybe there will be some who become voices of moderation. Quelle horreur.

Nah, even I'll admit I was kinda being a dick. Seriously speaking though, I appreciate what you're hoping for and in an ideal world that might happen. However, when you a healthy mix of unjustly imprisoned and legitimately imprisoned, you're not likely to see much in the way of moderate voices.

(Edit: OWS = Occupy Wall Street)
 
nib95 said:
To be fair, I'd imagine a huge chunk of those 1000 prisoners are innocent, so it's probably balanced out. Not like Israeli's don't get away with atrocities or anything. Hell, they do pretty much every day. Hope the people who genuinely are responsible for atrocities get their dues on both sides.

Anyone know how many Palestinian prisoners Israel holds altogether?
That's a very unreasonable thing to say.
From wikipedia: "Among the 1,027 prisoners expected to be released there are about 280 murderers sentenced to life imprisonment, including .."
Even if you don't believe Israeli figures, that must still mean at least half of those are actual murders. Saying things "balance out" with 140 murderers is a bit difficult.
You just spouting things without even trying to back them up, because of some gut feeling you have.
I don't mean that you should attach references to every post but I'm sure that no situation is as black-and-white as you seemingly present it here so perhaps it'll help you to research some things in objective sources (wikipedia is great in that regard).
 
KimiSan said:
That's a very unreasonable thing to say.
From wikipedia: "Among the 1,027 prisoners expected to be released there are about 280 murderers sentenced to life imprisonment, including .."
Even if you don't believe Israeli figures, that must still mean at least half of those are actual murders. Saying things "balance out" with 140 murderers is a bit difficult.
You just spouting things without even trying to back them up, because of some gut feeling you have.
I don't mean that you should attach references to every post but I'm sure that no situation is as black-and-white as you seemingly present it here so perhaps it'll help you to research some things in objective sources (wikipedia is great in that regard).
Palestinians dont have the luxury of imprisoning the murderers from Operation Cast Lead and other Israeli operations. Some of the Palestinian killers were sentenced 30 years ago. God knows how many Israeli war criminals have had no punishment whatsoever in that time frame. Even overseeing a genocidal operation, as Ariel Sharon did, apparently isnt enough to warrant imprisonment in israel, so long as it's Arabs being killed.
Netanyahu's claim that Israel doesnt celebrate murderers is laughably false.
 
Israel kill thousands and thousands of people throwing rocks at them with tanks: THEY ARE FIGHTING TERRORISTS!

Palestine take one Israeli soldier hostage then free him after negotiations: WHAT TERRIBLE PEOPLE!
 
WrathOfOtaibah said:
Israel kill thousands and thousands of people throwing rocks at them with tanks: THEY ARE FIGHTING TERRORISTS!

Palestine take one Israeli soldier hostage then free him after negotiations: WHAT TERRIBLE PEOPLE!

uh... no.
 
Damn, pretty impossible decision to make. You win and lose no matter what choice you make. Glad he is home though.

Some of you try too hard, literally every israel related thread. Ah well.
 
WrathOfOtaibah said:
Why's that?


Well, first of all, your attempt at simplifying what happened is completely off. Second of all, you can't really simplify either situation really, because all this crap is pretty fucken complex, and can't be summarized as one side is evil the other side is not!
 
quadriplegicjon said:
uh... no.
Israel did precisely that in the first intifada in the late 80s and early 90s. nonviolent protests were broken up with brutal and overwhelming force on Yitzhak Rabin's orders. "Break their bones", Rabin said.
Then it got more violent on the Palestinian side, for justifiable reasons. Even Europe and America had trouble reconciling their support of Israel with the brutal retribution it dished out to rock throwing kids. The first intifada was a major Israeli PR disaster, coming just a few years after the genocidal operation overseen by Ariel Sharon at Sabra and Shatila.
None of the Israeli killers from the first intifada ever got multiple life sentences.
 
quadriplegicjon said:
Well, first of all, your attempt at simplifying what happened is completely off. Second of all, you can't really simplify either situation really, because all this crap is pretty fucken complex, and can't be summarized as one side is evil the other side is not!

While I agree that both sides have done some bad shit, which is putting it lightly, but are you seriously going to act like they're on equal footing when it comes to atrocities. Cause honey, Israel have killed and done much worse to Palestine than Palestine can ever hope to do to Israel. It isn't an opinion, it is pretty much fact.

I don't care for either sides religious beliefs or their political agendas(if you're wondering yes I'm well informed of both), but when it comes to human rights Israel is by far the biggest violator in what they do to Palestine. And being surprised that a country committing violence is being reacted upon with violent measures is funny.
 
WrathOfOtaibah said:
While I agree that both sides have done some bad shit, which is putting it lightly, but are you seriously going to act like they're on equal footing when it comes to atrocities. Cause honey, Israel have killed and done much worse to Palestine than Palestine can ever hope to do to Israel. It isn't an opinion, it is pretty much fact.

I don't care for either sides religious beliefs or their political agendas(if you're wondering yes I'm well informed of both), but when it comes to human rights Israel is by far the biggest violator in what they do to Palestine. And being surprised that a country committing violence is being reacted upon with violent measures is funny.


Did I say they were on equal footing?

And atrocities from one side does not excuse atrocities from the other side, no matter which side has killed more. I really really hate the argument that Israel has killed more palestinians so it doesn't matter that palestinians have killed Israelis! It's absolutely ridiculous.
 
Re: the first intifada.
Israel, the merciful:
"23,600 to 29,900 children required medical treatment for their beating injuries in the first two years of the (first) intifada", one third of whom were children under the age of ten years old"
(Save the Children)

can you imagine if Hamas or the PLO caused 23,000 casualties among Israeli children, one third of them under the age of 10? 30 years later, we'd still be hearing about it.
 
quadriplegicjon said:
Did I say they were on equal footing?

And atrocities from one side does not excuse atrocities from the other side, no matter which side has killed more. I really really hate the argument that Israel has killed more palestinians so it doesn't matter that palestinians have killed Israelis! It's absolutely ridiculous.

....That's not what I said.

What I did say was that it is utterly idiotic to think violent actions don't provoke violent reactions. And being shocked that Palestine did anything violent is pure ignorance to how the world works.

Do we all want this shit to end so we can't stop hearing about it or about the many poor people who get killed because of that bullshit? yes. Will it though? probably not. What you do need is for an actual effort to end this war that doesn't involve ceasing he other sides existence. And Israel having more power in the region doesn't want to and repeatedly broke peace negotiations, so even if both sides are at fault. Israel is most definitely more at fault.
 
WrathOfOtaibah said:
....That's not what I said.

What I did say was that it is utterly idiotic to think violent actions don't provoke violent reactions. And being shocked that Palestine did anything violent is pure ignorance to how the world works.

Do we all want this shit to end so we can't stop hearing about it or about the many poor people who get killed because of that bullshit? yes. Will it though? probably not. What you do need is for an actual effort to end this war that doesn't involve ceasing he other sides existence. And Israel having more power in the region doesn't want to and repeatedly broke peace negotiations, so even if both sides are at fault. Israel is most definitely more at fault.


What you said sounded like this:

So Hamas crossed the border, killed some soldiers, kidnapped a soldier, and basically instigated a war with Israel where many more palestinians were killed, but they freed that one prisoner many years later so it's all cool!
 
theignoramus said:
Re: the first intifada.
Israel, the merciful:
"23,600 to 29,900 children required medical treatment for their beating injuries in the first two years of the (first) intifada", one third of whom were children under the age of ten years old"
(Save the Children)

can you imagine if Hamas or the PLO caused 23,000 casualties among Israeli children, one third of them under the age of 10? 30 years later, we'd still be hearing about it.


I never said it wasn't disgusting, but Palestinian leaders closed down all the schools and encouraged women and children to participate in the riots. Israels response was disgusting, but the Palestinian leaders use of those women and children was also disgusting (different level though).

That is what I mean. This shit is far from one sided.
 
quadriplegicjon said:
I never said it wasn't disgusting, but Palestinian leaders closed down all the schools and encouraged women and children to participate in the riots. Israels response was disgusting, but the Palestinian leaders use of those women and children was also disgusting (different level though).

That is what I mean. This shit is far from one sided.
Yes, but who is the illegal occupier and who has been saying, since 1948 that "Arabs only understand the language of force"?
I mean, everyone condemns Hamas' looney toon charter and Elders of Zion nonsense, but it's not like the Israeli elite's contemptuous attitudes towards Arabs hasnt been well documented over and over and over and over again. Furthermore, they have acted on these attitudes, with great efficiency, for decades
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom