Oh for fuck's sake. You're embarrassing yourself with this ridiculous tirade.
What happened here was wrong. Sexual assault, even. That doesn't make the video child pornography. It's wrong for news outlets to show this, but if it was child pornography they wouldn't be in the first place. Not calling the video child pornography does not infer that one condones or downplays what happened. If someone was unsatisfied with the censored version and wanted the uncensored version, then you'd have grounds for your moral outrage. I swear sometimes it seems like most of GAF has BPD.
I mean, wrong or not, he presented the notion that people are considering anything showing genitalia to be child pornography, using this "squirrel" video as an example. A reasonable person would have then explained why they do or do not think that simply showing genitalia qualifies. You intellectually dishonest fucks grabbed your pitchforks and pretended that he was equating the events that took in each video with each other, deliberately ignoring the sentence right before the one that mentioned the squirrel video.