Sutton Dagger
Member
survivor said:Are you a blogger "Yes." Strike one. What do you blog about "Technology and gadgets" Strike two. Who do you blog for? "Gizmodo." Strike three.
Someone please post this on her twitter account, it's gold.
survivor said:Are you a blogger "Yes." Strike one. What do you blog about "Technology and gadgets" Strike two. Who do you blog for? "Gizmodo." Strike three.
Ha ha, fair enough!The Crimson Blur said:Alcohol is not used in the rankings. A girl is judged sober and with a limp dick.
Depending on your drunkenness, you might bang a girl you may have otherwise thought unbangable, but that does not move her from the category of "no bang." That just means you need better friends.
The Crimson Blur said:There are only 4 rankings.
No Bang
Bang
Bang with Vigor
(the legendary 5th chakra gate) Rhino
All girls fall within those 4 rankings.
Shes a No bang.
The Crimson Blur said:Oh so you're like a video game reviewer.
The scale starts at 7 and ends at 10.
Yeah, 7.3 doesn't seem that off-base with that type of scale.
EXGN said:Lets be real, the real scale is 0 and 1, either you do or you don't. Everything else is just justification.
He's hotter than her. He dodged a bullet. I'd date him.Teh Hamburglar said:Is this the guy in question?
![]()
If so it is quite a feat to feel that smug and superior with looks like hers.
Mr.Swag said:Call me shallow but here's my scale:
1- Obese
2- Very fat/ and short
3- Very fat/ and tall
4- Ugly face meh body
5- Plain, no noticeable features
6- Butterfaces
7- Well maintained body, aight face
7.3 - This lady
8- Nice face, good enough body
9- Beautiful face, great body
9.5- Beautufil face beautiful body
10- Triple takes. Just GASP.
And yes I'm a virgin. I do have a girlfriend though. Shes an 8.1
Mr.Swag said:Call me shallow but here's my scale:
And yes I'm a virgin. I do have a girlfriend though. Shes an 8.1
ajf009 said:but really, stop trying to justify yourself, it's not working
Your inconsistency in terms of your scaleMr.Swag said:Justify what? My opinion?
I later found out that Jon infiltrated his way into OKCupid dates with at least two other people I sort of know, including one of my co-workers. Mothers, warn your daughters! This could happen to you. You'll think you've found a normal bearded guy with a job, only to end up sharing goat cheese with a guy who takes you to a one-man show based on Jeffrey Dahmer's life story
Mr.Swag said:Justify what? My opinion?
MorisUkunRasik said:I may have found the problem everyone.
Your number 4 is a pretty spot on description of this woman.
:lol :lolThe Broken Ska Record said:So beggars CAN be choosers.
Mr.Swag said:Call me shallow but here's my scale:
1- Obese
2- Very fat/ and short
3- Very fat/ and tall
4- Ugly face meh body
5- Plain, no noticeable features
6- Butterfaces
7- Well maintained body, aight face
7.3 - This lady
8- Nice face, good enough body
9- Beautiful face, great body
9.5- Beautufil face beautiful body
10- Triple takes. Just GASP.
And yes I'm a virgin. I do have a girlfriend though. Shes an 8.1
ultron87 said:I met this girl and she makes a living blogging about gadgets on the Internet! Oh heavens!
Glad I got out of there quickly.
BeautifulMemory said:Your inconsistency in terms of your scale
Yeah I think it's a little uncalled for, myself. It's her personality that matters and it seems she has a pretty shitty one, going by this article. If she was the coolest girl in the world it wouldn't really matter what she looked like.Fugu said:It is painfully ironic that in a thread about how this woman is being dismissive and shallow there are dozens of posts judging her based on a picture of her. Truly ridiculous.
EXGN said:Lets be real, the real scale is 0 and 1, either you do or you don't. Everything else is just justification.
FStop7 said:Yeah, I'm not sure where her sense of superiority comes from. Gizmodo's biggest claim to fame is having purchased Apple's stolen property. Not exactly the brass ring of journalism.
Fugu said:It is painfully ironic that in a thread about how this woman is being dismissive and shallow there are dozens of posts judging her based on a picture of her. Truly ridiculous.
Plywood said:I don't know where you get this extra .3 from either.
qcf x2 said:The nerdrage is predictably fierce. The dude comes off as an extremely geeky weirdo as evidenced by the Magic lifestyle and the Dahmer shit, sorry if it offends fans of either. Most women in real life are not going to put up with a man with interests in either of those, let alone both. What point do any of you that got your feelings hurt by the article hope to prove by tweeting/posting demeaning things about her? Because that's mostly what it's looked like so far in this thread: hurt feelings. You're not gonna change women's minds by vehemently defending a fantasy card game. The staunchness of the responses probably serves to justify their avoidance of such hobbies/lifestyles.
Fugu said:It is painfully ironic that in a thread about how this woman is being dismissive and shallow there are dozens of posts judging her based on a picture of her. Truly ridiculous.
Refresh me on this one?Blackface said:and turning off all the TV's at CES.
Fugu said:It is poetic justice that in a thread about how this woman is being dismissive and shallow there are dozens of posts judging her based on a picture of her. Truly ridiculous.
Jesus had it right on this one.Fugu said:It is painfully ironic that in a thread about how this woman is being dismissive and shallow there are dozens of posts judging her based on a picture of her. Truly ridiculous.
MorisUkunRasik said:I may have found the problem everyone.
Your number 4 is a pretty spot on description of this woman.
Neuromancer said:Yeah I think it's a little uncalled for
Zeliard said:It's pointless to focus on her looks when her personality is reprehensible enough.
And her article!Fugu said:It is painfully ironic that in a thread about how this woman is being dismissive and shallow there are dozens of posts judging her based on a picture of her. Truly ridiculous.
Fugu said:It is painfully ironic that in a thread about how this woman is being dismissive and shallow there are dozens of posts judging her based on a picture of her. Truly ridiculous.
Based on her twitter she did write for gizmodoJosh7289 said:But she writes for Gizmodo...?
Dissonance between the rational mind and sexual attraction, commonly known as the "whyboner."Devolution said:Makes you wonder what GAF would say if she was smokin' though.
Ultima_5 said:Her twitter account says she's a former gizmondo intern...
Did she get fired?
http://twitter.com/#!/search/alyssabereznak
Still would call her a bitch, but with a tacked on 'would' at the end. ;]Devolution said:Makes you wonder what GAF would say if she was smokin' though.