PassiveObserver
Member
While you guys are here discussing underrated gaming podcasts, I'd love to know what engages you about the podcasts you do listen to. Sometimes understanding the audience for this stuff is a REALLY tricky science. I often wonder if it's just college and high school people, or if working adults and older gamers listen to and consume this stuff, as well as questioning what they get out of it.
1. What do you prefer in your gaming podcasts? Do you prefer straight news and in-depth chatter about upcoming titles to which you don't yet have exposure? Does a show have less value (and interest) if the podcaster doesn't have 'inside access' or 'early access'?
2. Is comedy and casual conversation a necessary element? If the shows gave straight facts and data like APM's Marketplace or Daily Tech News Show? I'm not talking Polygon-dry. Polygon's mini-map is nearly unbearable to me and is an extreme example of news delivered straight. News+Commentary is more what I'm wondering about.
3. What do you think about the one-man show style? It's rare. Garnett on Games pulled it off. Is one man with tosses to guests depending on the topic something that would be interesting? Also, what about show length? I tend to enjoy longer shows. 1-2.5 hours is golden.
4. For you international listeners, do you feel as if the shows are too american focused? I've recently been thinking about podcasting and although I'm in the states, I'm beginning to question how inclusive our podcasts are. There's a lot of international gaming consumption, and sometimes it feels as if these shows cater to the same group of white guys that hang out together. Would being more inclusive even matter if the show is talking about gaming?
1. Personally, I don't follow current-gen gaming all that closely so I usually look for episodes focused on one game or series. Usually that would entail a retrospective approach. I'm perfectly fine with impression from normal gamers with no industry ties, as long as they're articulate about preferences.
2. Comedy and gaming just does not mix with me. Cracking jokes and having personalities is fine if it's natural, but don't make it a schtick. As long as the host and guests are talking about games, I'm interested. The further the conversation strays from that focus, the more I don't care.
3. One man show style is tough. It'd have to be very well written beforehand, or else the host needs a lot of charisma. One format this would work in is for reviews. Even a professional comedian like Bill Burr, who does a solo rant podcast, I find boring after a while. An informed guest or panel of guests is key for the host to bounce off of, and to bring different reactions to a game into the fold. Just make sure there's no cross-talking.
4. n/a
Here's my list of shows that fit into my criteria for a good gaming podcast:
Cane and Rinse - single game focus, informed guests who played the game and have insight to bring to the episode, well-structured with history, context, current reaction. Ace.
Back in My Play - Focused on topic, retro-focused, current gaming news tacked on at end of episode instead of at the front, which is such a good choice
Polygon's Quality Control - Informed reviewer telling another gamer about a game and why it got the score it did, highlighting praiseworthy aspects and flaws, in a succinct 20 minute podcast. Great format for keeping updated with new releases
Game Boy Crammer - One man show, but the dude brings an even tone and insight to reviewing batches of 3-5 Game Boy games per episode. Nice editing, with direct game sounds used as background music. Sadly this podcast has ended.
Watch Out for Fireballs - Takes a similar approach as Cane and Rinse where they play one game and talk about it for up to 3 hours. Really breaks down each game from beginning to end. Beware, they have skits and I usually lose interest in the middle of the episode, but the stuff they've covered makes it one to check out, at least. Edit: I just listened to an episode and I have to retract my recommendation. They do talk at lengths about the games, but they spend way too much time detailing and making fun of video game narratives rather than talking about mechanics or end-user experience. Waste of time of a podcast. I'm sorry I brought it up.
I vastly prefer shows where the participants make time to play the game of that episode, rather than simply having people tell of what they've played that week. Again, it all comes down to the focus and preparation put into the podcast.
