They've made some pretty good Android phones the past year or so, so yeah, people buy their phones.Combichristoffersen said:Why? Do people still buy Motorola phones? Isn't their mobile division as dead outside the US as Nokia is outside.. well, pretty much everywhere?
http://www.businessinsider.com/moto...t-if-we-could-get-that-nokia-deal-2011-8?op=1Motorola Mobility CEO Sanjay Jha now says he'd be interested in shipping Windows Phones if Motorola could get the same kind of deal that Nokia got from Microsoft.
giga said:Question answered: Nope.
Andy: We have the Nexus program and the lead device strategy. What we do is we select an OEM around Christmastime of each year -- a chip company, everything else -- and they all huddle together in one building, and around the holidays a new device pops out. That won't change, Moto will be a separate business and part of that bidding process.
br0ken_shad0w said:Hope this means no more motoblur and retroactively unlocking bootloaders. And I'm surprised people still never heard of Motorola recently. The DROID brand is huge and basically got android popular with the general public.
Polari said:Massive news. Patents aside, I'm interested to see how they plan use this to push the Android brand forward. They say they'll keep the businesses separate, but surely having the software and hardware teams working together makes innovation easier. It's also worth noting Motorola's work in set-top boxes and home automation is probably pretty compelling to Google.
Cloudy said:What does this mean for the Xoom?
Dead Man said:Motorola make a lot of shit besides phones.
Fatalah said:Did you guys all miss out on the Razr? Everyone and their grandma owned one at some point in the early 2000s. Its sales broke records. For some time Motorola fell behind the smartphone market, but their powerplay in launching the original Droid played a huge part in Android's early adoption.
eLZhi said:They've made some pretty good Android phones the past year or so, so yeah, people buy their phones.
345triangle said:the real news to me is that motorola is actually called MOTOROLA MOBILITY. awesome.
i wonder what google will get out of this that they didn't already get out of motorola pretty much pinning their flag to android in the first place. those are some expensive patent rights.
brotkasten said:Do you guys think the division was worth $12.5B? The CEO might have pushed the price a bit last week.
http://www.businessinsider.com/moto...t-if-we-could-get-that-nokia-deal-2011-8?op=1
And I might be wrong, but doesn't it sound like they were in talks with Microsoft, too?
ShabbadooJr said:Google should've bought HTC instead of Motorola.
zomgbbqftw said:They bought Moto Mobility which is the handset division.
Nix that, mobility does include set top boxes, but not automation systems or networking.Polari said:Who also manufacture set-top boxes and home automation systems.
Google never competed with moto. Moto made Android phones.Shorty said:In an attempt to increase competition Goole eliminates a competitor. Got it.
Alx said:It still amaze me how most people in the 90s considered Microsoft a big danger because they had their OS on most PCs, while now Google controls most of information (web search, digital books), "scanned" the whole planet, try to take control of mobile communication, social networking, virtual OS etc... and it's cool because they're "the good guys".
zomgbbqftw said:Nix that, mobility does include set top boxes, but not automation systems or networking.
noShorty said:In an attempt to increase competition Goole eliminates a competitor. Got it.
Motorola was flirting with Windows Phone and had its skunkworks mobile operating system (http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/223252/will_a_new_motorola_os_rival_android_and_ios.html) it was working on.DarkFlow83 said:Google never competed with moto. Moto made Android phones.
Combichristoffersen said:Honestly, I don't think I've met anyone with a Motorola phone since I was in secondary school 13 years ago (my first phone was a Motorola, and it was built as a tank). And even back then it was all about Nokia, before Sony Ericsson took over, and nowadays it's Sony Ericsson, Apple, HTC and Samsung (although SE seems to have fallen somewhat by the wayside as of late).
I don't think I've ever seen anything Motorola-branded besides their cell phones, which I last saw over a decade ago. Is the company completely dead here in Europe or something?
Q: Regarding Google potentially competing with other OEMs.
Page: No change in how were running Android. Android is still open. Our partners are very excited about this.
Rubin: Motorola was one of the early licensees. After the transaction nothing changes. Its business as usual. Its about protecting and extending the ecosystem.
Well, it was less of a "fuck you Google for doing this" and more of a "fuck the fact that this is needed".Noshino said:Except Google from the beginning has been trying to fight the system.
Mobility was spun off a long time ago.Copernicus said:I wonder is this will pass DOJ scrutiny.
This was obviously a long term plan between google/motorola and explains the mobility spin off.
Hello ugly Nexuses!
Well they need those patents if Apple is trying to block the sales of their android devices in different countries...D4Danger said:holy shit! $12.5 billion
Google really needs those patents they don't care about
thcsquad said:Well, in the US Motorola Droids are ridiculously popular.
The other Motorola (the part that is still called Motorola after the Mobility spinoff) does other radio-type hardware and installations, like police radios. That section of their business is huge and from what I can remember, profitable.
SomeDude said:Could Google afford to buy a company like microsoft or IBM?
No, Microsoft and IBM are much larger than Google.SomeDude said:Could Google afford to buy a company like microsoft or IBM?
Sony is not worth $80B and haven't been since the early 2000's. They're around $24Bzomgbbqftw said:No. The furthest they could go is maybe Sony at around $80-90bn and that would have to be through share issuance, not cash.