-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
GRAW 2 Unveiled (360) Pics and Vid
- Thread starter duk
- Start date
speculawyer
Member
GRAW, Splinter Cell: DA, Rainbox Six: Vegas, GRAW 2, . . . Tom Clancy overload.
Ubi better be careful and not burn out that Tom Clancy IP . . . they are milking that cash cow like crazy.
Ubi better be careful and not burn out that Tom Clancy IP . . . they are milking that cash cow like crazy.
Teleporter
Junior Member
Might looks huh!?
Hope they revamp the gameplay and play mechanics... Is a controlable vehicle to much to ask for? Ubi put youre best efforts on this awesome IP!
Hope they revamp the gameplay and play mechanics... Is a controlable vehicle to much to ask for? Ubi put youre best efforts on this awesome IP!
PantherLotus
Professional Schmuck
It goes to show you what an untrained eye can appreciate. You see, I posted the whole set earlier today in the 360 Screenshot Thread (56k no) and thought they looked freaking awesome. Like: "****ing hell I can't believe they're making games that look this real. I can imagine why some people that are mentally unstable could be pushed over the edge with this kind of realism."
And people here are like "OMG it looks just like the last one!"
Now here's the question: How much more can it seriously be improved? Hell, the game already looks like reality to me. Without starting a shitstorm in the wrong thread, is this a case of diminishing returns? Are we really that close to where improvements are really not noticeable? I'm definitely not a graphics expert, but I know what looks good...and this game looks like real freaking life to me.
More over: when we are already this close to reality (visual), where are we still needing improvement? Physics? AI? Water Physics? More realistic wind? How long until we can expect the even greater realism?
Just an amateur here wondering what its gonna take for a game to get your graphical approval.
And people here are like "OMG it looks just like the last one!"
Now here's the question: How much more can it seriously be improved? Hell, the game already looks like reality to me. Without starting a shitstorm in the wrong thread, is this a case of diminishing returns? Are we really that close to where improvements are really not noticeable? I'm definitely not a graphics expert, but I know what looks good...and this game looks like real freaking life to me.
More over: when we are already this close to reality (visual), where are we still needing improvement? Physics? AI? Water Physics? More realistic wind? How long until we can expect the even greater realism?
Just an amateur here wondering what its gonna take for a game to get your graphical approval.
Kleegamefan
K. LEE GAIDEN
I love GRAW.....cant wait for GRAW2 
Willy Wanka
my god this avatar owns
It really does look almost exactly like GRAW 1 but I did like that game a lot so I'll probably get this too. Just give me lots of online co-op maps!
Chet Blevins
Banned
AAK said:
Rape isnt funny.
AdmiralViscen
Banned
Can we expect a price cut for the first one, now? I've never wanted to put $60 on it (got 360 when Dead Rising came out).
devilscallmedad
Banned
Ubisoft is REALLY trying to beat EA, a new game of every franchise every year with little or no changes
meltpotato
Member
Dante said:
generic protagonists and tom clancy go together like peanut butter and jelly (if you arent allergic to peanuts)
Funky Papa
FUNK-Y-PPA-4
Ubi gots some mad photoshop skillz yo.
DarkJediKnight
Member
Mission Objective: "Don't DIE within 2 miles!!!" :lol :lol
Sgt. Killjoy
Member
isnt that just art? those don't look like screens.
graw2 is slightly more detailed, but i see it moreso on character models instead of the environments.
graw2 is slightly more detailed, but i see it moreso on character models instead of the environments.
The first GRAW was buggy as hell. I had to give up on the game because of a 100% reproducible progression blocking bug that I encountered while protecting tanks driving through the city while I was on rooftop. I read forum after forum of people having the same issue. If anything, they need to play test these games a little longer before releasing them to the public.
Patrick Bateman
Member
urk said:
Isn´t this from the GRAW1-XboxLive-Demo?
I´m sorry, but I can´t see a difference. :x
Man, why do they have to make them look so obviously touched up? Ugh... the game looked good as it was naturally...
And as much as I had fun with GRAW, I'll probably be skipping on the second one, as I only really played with friends, never on my own (although we REALLY played the hell out of it for months) - and I didn't like the price point of the DLC at all...
Plus I hated the night and day difference between SP and MP, both in visuals and gameplay... Gears has proven that both can actually look and play the same... step your game up Ubi - it's another thing I hate about Tom Clancy games that has been made even more painfully obvious in this new-gen (GRAW, SC: DA and R6:V) - it's like owning two different games on one disc...
And as much as I had fun with GRAW, I'll probably be skipping on the second one, as I only really played with friends, never on my own (although we REALLY played the hell out of it for months) - and I didn't like the price point of the DLC at all...
Plus I hated the night and day difference between SP and MP, both in visuals and gameplay... Gears has proven that both can actually look and play the same... step your game up Ubi - it's another thing I hate about Tom Clancy games that has been made even more painfully obvious in this new-gen (GRAW, SC: DA and R6:V) - it's like owning two different games on one disc...