GIANKRATOS
Member
Character models.=p
Lol sorry, i totally misunderstood. I agree with you.
Character models.=p
Nope.![]()
Also 1080p is great news for the PS4 version.
Maybe they mean artistically or maybe if you consider scale, if they mean technically or higher fidelity they must be on Drugs.I love GTA5 a lot and am definitely double dipping for it on the PS4, but to claim it looks better than inFamous is absurd.
yeah....those GTA models looks blurry as hell compared to second son... more jaggies too.
Maybe they mean artistically or maybe if you consider scale, if they mean technically or higher fidelity they must be on Drugs.
BTW the remaster on PS4 will however look probably much better than Watch Dogs while having a much bigger scale, physics and it's probably surpassing WD in every department, and all that while running at 1080p vs 900p of WD, I don't know if Rockstar are more talented or it's just Ubi that fucked up.
Wow, who would've known that a 1080p current gen game looks clearer than a 720p last gen game?
With the exception of lighting, I'd say it looks comparable or even better than inFamous Second Son.
You...Wow, who would've known that a 1080p current gen game looks clearer than a 720p last gen game?
And no, GTA5 PS4 trailers still don't look as good as infamous.It already looked better, now it looks FAR better.
Maybe they mean artistically or maybe if you consider scale, if they mean technically or higher fidelity they must be on Drugs.
With the exception of lighting, I'd say it looks comparable or even better than inFamous Second Son.
You...
Please point me to where I said 720p looks clearer than 1080p. The only thing I've said is claiming that GTA 5 looks better in art and styling than Infamous, which is completely valid because it's what I think. Lighting and style has almost nothing to do with resolution.
I already said it was based purely on art style.so how does that justify saying it now looks "FAR BETTER." should have been clear... you personally think art direction looks far better - opinion.
Artistic, of course. A PS3/360 game is never going to have the detail of a One/PS4 game.
GTA 5 has its obvious issues such as LOD streaming and lack of AA/AF, but they absolutely nailed the lighting and I don't think I've seen a better styled game, current gen or not.
I already said it was based purely on art style.
It already looked better, now it looks FAR better.
okay. my bad!
yeah....those GTA models looks blurry as hell compared to second son... more jaggies too.
Oh no you didn't. You just sommoned the Crytek defense force.Infamous Second Son has the most complex facial shader in a game released till date, only game that comes close so far is Ryse and their facial animation system is top of the line too [...]
Infamous Second Son has the most complex facial shader in a game released till date, only game that comes close so far is Ryse and their facial animation system is top of the line too, to claim that GTA5 has better character models is absurd. It's not better at anything (except Euphoria for character animation, but Infamous specifically avoids using physics for character animation for gameplay purpose) even at scale since it does not actually load up the entire map and you can't see all that much at one time, even when you are in a plane you need only to look at the level of detail of the terrain and objects that are actually rendered to realise how low they are, it is afterall a last gen game. And it shows because anything that is further away is rendered at a very low detail comparatively speaking.
There was someone in here on the last page I think who said GTA5 on PS3 looked better than most games on PS4, that is factually wrong in any sense.
Oh no you didn't. You just sommoned the Crytek defense force.
I've been considerably more impressed by Ryse's skin shader than what I played of Infamous SS. Infamous' characters look like clay, in terms of character models Ryse is far ahead of Infamous IMHO, but the latter is bigger in scope.
It looks like the same game to me. I didn't make Delson blurry, honest.
![]()
It looks like the same game to me. I didn't make Delsin blurry, honest.
![]()
Sony will definitely be smart and announce a PS4 bundle right? I will buy one in a heartbeat if it happens. Preferably white with the disc included.
What your saying is besides the point and a different discussion entirely. The person I replied to said that textures and character models were better in GTA V in comparison to I:SS. Which clearly isn't true.
people who are saying GTAV looks better than Infamous needs to get their eye checked seriously. Btw this thread is going no where. That title and first post so fucking misleading. Where the fuck is the conformation.
The same magazine that only rehashed the trailer footage. Yeah, that's not a real confirmation.The confirmation is in a scan of a magazine article that we're not able to post.
Nothing official.
The same magazine that only rehashed the trailer footage. Yeah, that's not a real confirmation.
Delsin should clearly be in the next GTA.
Photobomb!
![]()
The confirmation is in a scan of a magazine article that we're not able to post.
Nothing official.
So someone change the damn title and update the first post. So its less misleading.
It looks like the same game to me. I didn't make Delsin blurry, honest.
![]()
Delsin should clearly be in the next GTA.
Photobomb!
![]()
How reliable is OPM?
Better than infamous? Nah maybe nicer looking than watch dogs?
It looks like the same game to me. I didn't make Delsin blurry, honest.
![]()
Why don't you post a gameplay screenshot from Ryse (not one from the pre-rendered cutscenes) so we can do a proper comparison? Infamous Second Son has very nice in-game skin shaders and Delsin doesn't look like clay at all.
I haven't played the game, but the images that I have seen of the shrink look worse than the image in the digital manual. And I remember there being some cry over that it didn't look the same in game as in the tv ads.[SNIP]
Don't think it'll look better or close to Unity unless they completely redid the textures on the beards and hair, Unity like Infamous SS takes place in presumably in a smaller (but much denser) open world & doesn't look cross gen by any means. Especially Elise's model.
[SNIP]
Cutscenes use the same quality model as gameplay.
Their tech detailed here :
I have a shiver there. Like a ghost.Delsin should clearly be in the next GTA.
Photobomb!
![]()
I don't care what that article says, I've played the game on my X1, and the cut-scene models looked noticeably better than the in-game models. The faces weren't as detailed/ didn't have the same fidelity, and the hair had a horrible dithering effect (a la MGSV:GZ) that wasn't evident in cutscenes.