Also, I feel kind of bad for the junior that got banned for saying, admittedly too bluntly, what everyone on both sides of the opinion was thinking about the original design. It's entirely possible he wasn't being pejorative and was just using "gay" as a descriptor. The original design does read as slightly effeminate and homoerotic in a Western context. For some, that's a plus. For others, a minus. But it definitely read a certain way.