• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Hardcore & HD gamers: Are you feeling Super Mario Galaxy's G-Force?

Status
Not open for further replies.
monchi-kun said:
they're not hardcore, they just have free time....socom is like Liberal Arts classes, everyone takes em


Um...no, no those guys are hardcore. Trust me on that. Competitive S2 is a thing of beauty...top clans pulled some awesome stuff.


People who play MUDs and power level in MUDs are hardcore gamers, and most of them don't give a shit about mario games, at least the ones I knew.
 
monchi-kun said:
they're not hardcore, they just have free time....socom is like Liberal Arts classes, everyone takes em
SOCOM II is the best online console game ever (and it included the best map on any online game, Crossroads) - watch your words.

I had an absolute blast with every Mario title I played, but SOCOM II is a beast.
 
PAYBACKill said:
this is what is wrong with nintendo fans.

think of every non gaming activity people do. Think of an adventure racer, or a scuba diver, or a race car driver. Think of breakdancers, musicians, artists. Imagine you telling them that because they just aren't into a mario game that they don't enjoy life. Now see it from their side; You sit and stare at a screen while a video avatar of a plumber jumps on things, while they are out enjoying life. See how you don't need to "not enjoy life" to not like mario games?


big world. lots of ways to spend your time. Mario is only cool to nintendo fans, not "anyone who likes fun"

I definitely see where your coming from, but I'm talking more on the gamer side of thing. Your last sentence is sort of what I'm talking about, Mario is fun/cool to non-Nintendo fans, in fact I would say that it is probably their only series that is, except for maybe Brain Age. I probably did go a little overboard there on the whole "not enjoying life" thing, but whatever.

From a graphical perspective, I can see how you don't think Galaxy isn't the best looking game ever, just because it isn't. It has a great art style that sort of half erases the Wii's graphical limitations, but when compared to high end games on the PC, 360, and PS3 it really has no chance.

Edit: As the Sharp said, this thread was made to be a disaster for both sides.
 
I'm sorry i just don't get it, It has great graphics for a Wii game but that isnt saying much. I'm glad you guys are excited about finally getting a good game coming out for the Wii but all the premature talk of GOTY is laughable.

It's not in HD so right there the visuals take a huge hit for me, but I still would love to play it. It just seems to be extremely overhyped around here becuase it looks good which seems ignorant,And I wouldnt buy a system for this game but I would like to play it.
 
anaron said:
I'm sorry i just don't get it, It has great graphics for a Wii game but that isnt saying much. I'm glad you guys are excited about finally getting a good game coming out for the Wii but all the premature talk of GOTY is laughable.

It's not in HD so right there the visuals take a huge hit for me, but I still would love to play it. It just seems to be extremely overhyped around here becuase it looks good which seems ignorant,And I wouldnt buy a system for this game but I would like to play it.

Well, it doesn't just look good. We all know it sounds good, plays incredibly well, has top-notch controls, and every single level we've seen is unique in some way. By now a lot of people have played the Gamestop demo.
 
anaron said:
I'm sorry i just don't get it, It has great graphics for a Wii game but that isnt saying much. I'm glad you guys are excited about finally getting a good game coming out for the Wii but all the premature talk of GOTY is laughable.

It's not in HD so right there the visuals take a huge hit for me, but I still would love to play it. It just seems to be extremely overhyped around here becuase it looks good which seems ignorant,And I wouldnt buy a system for this game but I would like to play it.
I just don't get HD. I do have an Xbox 360 with HD graphics/lcd screen but still...
I don't see the advanced AI in "HD" Games. The "I'd rather shoot a rock" AI is still there. The screen tearing is still there, the Jaggies are also present in most HD games. The framerate? Mario Galaxy runs at a smooth 60fps, yet the "HD" Games run at 20 at most, with a few exceptions of 30fps and rarely a capgod 60fps game. The controls are archaic. The textures are still low res, the bumb mapping all over the place and the particles basicly the same. The only reason I'm playing in HD, are the games. The great racing games for the Xbox 360 for example, those aren't on Wii so I bought a Xbox 360 for that. You won't find Super Mario Galaxy on Xbox 360, so it would be logical to buy a Wii for those games.

"I won't buy SD/480p/DL2 Galaxy, because devs say you can't do good AI and graphics on the Wii." is the same bullshit as "I won't buy games without motion controls they don't have good gameplay!" If you're interested in Super Mario Galaxy you should just buy the game.
 
Stopsign said:
I definitely see where your coming from, but I'm talking more on the gamer side of thing. Your last sentence is sort of what I'm talking about, Mario is fun/cool to non-Nintendo fans, in fact I would say that it is probably their only series that is, except for maybe Brain Age. I probably did go a little overboard there on the whole "not enjoying life" thing, but whatever.

From a graphical perspective, I can see how you don't think Galaxy isn't the best looking game ever, just because it isn't. It has a great art style that sort of half erases the Wii's graphical limitations, but when compared to high end games on the PC, 360, and PS3 it really has no chance.

Edit: As the Sharp said, this thread was made to be a disaster for both sides.



Ok, thats fair...so all gamers , you are saying, like mario games? Honestly Ive been a gamer pretty much all of my life and I think Kirby > mario, just off the 3 mario games on nes I played via emulator. Graphics don't really enter into it. When a game looks like wii sports, yeah..then you kind of notice the game looks like shit, but mario looks fine. Not great, not mind bending, but like a pleasant looking game. Guitar Hero and rock band are huge / going to be huge, and that isn't me being an HD graphics snob, thats fun gameplay. 7th guest was huge, do you think it was all about HD graphics? I think it was the puzzles and atmosphere the game presented. Secret of Monkey Island was huge and I liked that, it certainly wasn't a graphics thing.

nothing in mario appeals to me. The art, characters, setting, story. Nothing. I don't like the feel of the games either, although that has more to do with Mario 64 than the NES games.


I think video gaming culture is making a hero out of mario for its iconic role in early console gaming rather than what the games acheive now. Not in gameplay, not in graphics,sound, control, etc. Mario games don't do what MGS did...when you first encounter psycho mantis it was pretty awesome how far out of the video game box you had to think to fight him. I was really into s2, so lets use that. Socom 2 gave me hundreds of hours of enjoyment online, played probably 5-25 hours a week for years, and definately played at least some every day. Has there ever been a mario game that gave people hundreds and hundreds of hours of enjoyment? New experiences online every time? No...but hey thats unfair, mario games are offline. Fair enough. Oblivion was epic, and personally I'd take oblivion over Mario. Was it the worlds mario gives you to explore? Tomb Raider, Oblivion both do it better than present day mario games.

And what was "wrong" with jumping flash that it is not considered a classic while people adore mario 64? JF was an AMAZING platformer.


I think the art style nintendo went for never was a hit for me. I remember as a kid loving phantasy star's taller , thinner looking characters over the SNES short squat art direction.
 
PAYBACKill said:
Um...no, no those guys are hardcore. Trust me on that. Competitive S2 is a thing of beauty...top clans pulled some awesome stuff.


People who play MUDs and power level in MUDs are hardcore gamers, and most of them don't give a shit about mario games, at least the ones I knew.

you guys are gettung it all wrong....being hardcore means taking as much hate as you possibly can for doing what you love.

so right now the only hardcore players are people who like Mario and own a PS3
 
[Nintex] said:
I just don't get HD. I do have an Xbox 360 with HD graphics/lcd screen but still...
I don't see the advanced AI in "HD" Games. The "I'd rather shoot a rock" AI is still there. The screen tearing is still there, the Jaggies are also present in most HD games. The framerate? Mario Galaxy runs at a smooth 60fps, yet the "HD" Games run at 20 at most, with a few exceptions of 30fps and rarely a capgod 60fps game. The controls are archaic. The textures are still low res, the bumb mapping all over the place and the particles basicly the same. The only reason I'm playing in HD, are the games. The great racing games for the Xbox 360 for example, those aren't on Wii so I bought a Xbox 360 for that. You won't find Super Mario Galaxy on Xbox 360, so it would be logical to buy a Wii for those games.

"I won't buy SD/480p/DL2 Galaxy, because devs say you can't do good AI and graphics on the Wii." is the same bullshit as "I won't buy games without motion controls they don't have good gameplay!" If you're interested in Super Mario Galaxy you should just buy the game.



What the fuck are you talking about man?? Have you played bioshock, gears, ratchet and clank future, heavenly sword, halo3 ??? This list goes on, advances in AI are questionable, but as far as graphics are concerned....textures, effects, lighting, etc....the shit is far beyond "non hd" consoles.

Also, most hd games play at 20 fps??? What the hell are you playing man? You seem to be arguing for logic, while your statements are just inflammitory bullshit.

On topic, I own all three consoles, and am certainly super hyped for SMG....what real hardcore gamer wouldn't be? The game looks incredible, certainly GOTY contender....2007 has been real sweet, and the best is probably yet to come.
 
Lol sorry to be offtopic but what exactly is Hardcore? I see people throwing hardcore left and right and it confuses me.
 
pswii60 said:
Anyone who has been following my posts for the last year (all 0 of you), would know that I've generally been pretty negative about my Wii. 360 has been delivering quality HD gaming all year, and PS3 has wowed me with its Heavenly Sword beauty. While Wii has just been lackluster in most core gamer's opinions.

But, ya know, NO MORE. Super Mario Galaxy is almost here and suddenly I'm feeling converted. I look at those videos and think, holy shit, if there was just ONE game I'd have to play this generation, SMG would be it. Suddenly I'm falling in love with my Wii, and I haven't even got the game yet.


OK, I know this post is full of weekend-GAF, and I'll get my pubes plucked for it. But, I'm just wondering if even the most hardcore, HD-centric, anti-Wii gamers out there are suddenly, out of nowhere, finding a place in their heart for the console, and SMG?


No, but I am considering purchasing a Wii for Wii sports. My girlfriend likes playing this virtual bowling game at a local bar against me and I figure the Wii has Wii sports and of course bowling. I'd basically be buying a Wii for 1 game, but I don't really care. It's a tossup at this point for me.
 
Redd said:
Lol sorry to be offtopic but what exactly is Hardcore? I see people throwing hardcore left and right and it confuses me.

Hardcore is a term coined by nerds to make them feel better about their obsession with video games :lol
 
I'll wait for the reviews. Bsed on thatI could teeter on getting a Wii, but I really would rather not being that there is absolutly nothing else I want on the system. Maybe I'll just buy the game and play it at work.
 
monchi-kun said:
hardcore = enduring the hate
:lol

I don't know about being hardcore or whatever term people want to apply to it. I do mostly PC and 360 gaming. I do know that the thick coat of dust on the Wii in my room will be cleared when SMG comes out. I've been waiting for a reason to pick up that controller again and Galaxy is going to be it.
 
Redd said:
Lol sorry to be offtopic but what exactly is Hardcore? I see people throwing hardcore left and right and it confuses me.
Do you know the difference between hardcore porn and softcore (erotica)?
 
Then what the heck makes you not hardcore.....since I cant get a definition what hardcore is. Sorry again that im offtopic.
 
AstroLad said:
HD is necessary to be hardcore.
DumbandDumber0054.jpg
 
Lostconfused said:
I have a wii and ill be avoiding SMG. Of course that doesn't say much since i didn't get around to getting metroid prime corruption either.
this thread

jesus christ



what the fuck is wrong with some of you people
 
Galaxy (and Smash Brothers to a lesser extent) is enough to get me to begrudgingly purchase a Wii. Then again, I'll actually have to see one in stores first and I'm not going to break my balls to make that happen. I'll probably end up playing it sometime next year.
 
Raist said:
Exactly, you need HD + 7.1 sound

..........Well that's good to know. I guess that will make me a Hardcore gamer by the end of this year. Until then I dont know wtf kind of gamer that makes me.
 
It looks like a pretty good game, but it doesn't make me fully erect. I'd rather be playing Little Big Planet, TBH. Even though I realize, intellectually, that Nintendo's probably going to make the better playing game.
 
AndoCalrissian said:
A trollbait thread if I ever saw one, for both sides. Can this thread be locked please?
Hah yeah. I was tempted to post right from the start, but just know I'd get someone with too much time on their hands [like that doesn't include all of us] tearing through my post history to invalidate my opinion.
 
Raist said:
Exactly, you need HD + 7.1 sound
So there were no hardcore gamers before the advent of HDTVs? Playing the same games for the same amount of time and at the same skill level as a hardcore gamer, but on a SD TV automatically means you're not hardcore? That's interesting.

And ridiculous.
 
Redd said:
..........Well that's good to know. I guess that will make me a Hardcore gamer by the end of this year. Until then I dont know wtf kind of gamer that makes me.


A casual, obviously
 
AndoCalrissian said:
So there were no hardcore gamers before the advent of HDTVs? Playing the same games for the same amount of time and at the same skill level as a hardcore gamer, but on a SD TV automatically means you're not hardcore? That's interesting.

And ridiculous.

That's what people are saying. Hell raist says i'm casual so that's that.
 
Redd said:
..........Well that's good to know. I guess that will make me a Hardcore gamer by the end of this year. Until then I dont know wtf kind of gamer that makes me.

It doesn't really matter--and I won't call you names--but obviously you can't call yourself a true hardcore gamer unless you are enjoying games at least close to how they are meant to be enjoyed. A lot of people don't get this.

These are the same types of people who think they are "hardcore" even though all they own this gen is a Wii or just a 360 or whatever. Yeah real hardcore, you have a lot in common with every little kid at Wal-Mart who plays just Madden/Wii Play/Halo etc. :lol
 
Meh. I've played Mario Galaxy both at E3 and E for All and it really didn't do much for me. Nothing I must have; I can live without it.
 
AstroLad said:
It doesn't really matter--and I won't call you names--but obviously you can't call yourself a true hardcore gamer unless you are enjoying games at least close to how they are meant to be enjoyed. A lot of people don't get this.

These are the same types of people who think they are "hardcore" even though all they own this gen is a Wii or just a 360 or whatever. Yeah real hardcore, you have a lot in common with every little kid at Wal-Mart who plays just Madden/Wii Play/Halo etc. :lol
MOTHER OF GOD

WHAT THE FUCK
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom