For the people that say that if you have a pc you should also have money for games, that is such a privileged position, I live in a first world country and when I was a young child, I certainly didn't have money to throw around in games, I had a console, and an old ass computer (bought second hand).
I could maybe buy a couple of discounted games per year, and even that was a sacrifice for my parents, and there are certainly a ton of people in far worse situations, whose only means to enjoy gaming is piracy, people that have computers or consoles because someone offered it to them, but they don't have any actual means of buying them, or people that just simply don't have access to the same services we in developed countries enjoy.
But even if we discount this, the way I see it games have a cultural value, the bigger the amount of barriers there are between their access and people the poorer we are as a society, and as pieces of culture some can certainly lose value as they get older (and as such become more accessible).
How many developers can honestly say that they aren't better developers because they had access to a wide range and quantity of games, even not so long ago the tools required for developers to do their jobs (and to learn) were crazy expensive, now obviously things are far better these days, but lets not pretend that there is still not a wealth of gaming media that is all around pretty expensive for people with less financial means.
Would it be that bad for people that don't have money to buy games to play them? Because in that specific case one could argue that no one is getting hurt, no value is being lost, but value is in fact being added, by having 1 more person that has played the game and can talk about it.