Duracelllll said:Going to us.kotaku.com and clicking on any of the stories just takes me to the front page of kotaku.com.au now.... wasn't like that yesterday.
Of course if I go to kotaku.com it just takes me to kotaku.com.au I want to go to the US site, not the AU site... :\
Neuromancer said:Zing!
Tycho from Penny Arcade is not a fan either.
http://twitter.com/#!/TychoBrahe/status/34701745892364288
http://twitter.com/#!/TychoBrahe/status/34707950085873665
Thank the Porn! It's the only Gawker site that matters.smokeymicpot said:Had to check it out Fleshbot didn't change.
Ya, I'm with you. I like a few of their writers like Michael McWhertor and Stephen Totilo. Hell, even Leigh Alexander can be good when she doesn't mix math with drinking, so I never got the hate. And they're pretty good at blogging during conferences. But, they can be a bit quick to post unverified stuff (even though they label it as 'rumor'), which GAF posters do as well, but a forum should be allowed more slack than a news site.Cartman86 said:I feel terrible admitting it, but I kind of want to know the reason too. I kind of get annoyed at Kotaku's opinions at times, but they are an opinion site no? I don't read it enough to know if they get facts wrong. As a blog I want opinions, but I do have a problem with screwing with the facts. Hell Giantbomb is all about opinion and I love it for that.
I will agree that sometimes Kotaku posts stories related in no way to videogames, and that is pretty weird.
I'm sure I'm ignorant and someone will explain why they are so terrible and I'm blind for not seeing it.
EDIT: What does everyone think of Destructoid?
Gowans007 said:Oh my god it's awful!
http://kotaku.com/
I specialise in interface design for a world wide corporation and this goes against so many rules for user focused environments, YUK!
It looks like they have just ran with new web trends (two column social networking sites/twitter & mobile apps) for their news site if relevant to the format or not. But worst of all only show one post on the page (via horrible JavaScript fade) to enhance their click per story.
Terrible user experienced, I can't believe they got swept away with this.
Surely this is bad enough to hurt their audience.
Whats your thoughts GAF?
What really killed it for me was the speed, the site no longer scrolled smoothly.Tux said:So, I guess Kotaku doesn't think we can handle reading listed text-links or tags. Too complex. Now, it's all polished, simple, and linear. Reminds me of a museum exhibit; look, but don't touch. :X
exwallst said:Seems awful now but these things tend to grow on me.
Every time I go there it gets worse and worse, the opposite of growing on me. Even their "classic" mode is evil - I click on a story, get the full info. I click back...and I'm gone from the Gawker site, at the last page I was at before I went to Gawker.exwallst said:Seems awful now but these things tend to grow on me.
This should be put as the name of the thread.DigiMish said:
DigiMish said:
Dwayne said:blows my mind people "check sites" for news, isn't this what RSS is for?
First rule of design is if your customer doesn't know how to use your product, it's the designer's fault.Bad_Boy said:call me retarded but I really don't know how to navigate the new design.
Hahatimetokill said:
Fuck yeah, Canada.DigiMish said:
diffusionx said:I've been following some Gawker sites on Alexa and the pageviews seem to be down 25%+ week-over-week.
El_TigroX said:I believe they don't care about page views anymore. Nick Denton is selling ad time based on big stories and specific times of the day (like TV networks do). They are selling unique visitors...
The page view drop might spook some stupid, young media buyer, but eventually they'll come around to it. The page view model of evaluation is a dead end street and everyone knows it... just no one wants to pull the trigger like Gawker did.
Now, if the unique visitors plummet, well, that's a major fucking issue.
I don't think the design is good, but the spirit behind the design certainly is.
Anslon said:This should be put as the name of the thread.
Edit: Clicking on links still takes you to the crap redesign. I should have known it was too good to be true.
RobotsAnger said:I still see the old layout for the articles. Maybe because I'm in Canada?
exactly, I forgot what the old kotaku looks like because I just read the feeds on google reader.Dwayne said:blows my mind people "check sites" for news, isn't this what RSS is for?
Wow. WOW.Seda said:http://www.sitemeter.com/default.asp?action=stats&site=sm5kotaku&report=12
The redesign went up on the 7th.
Though this was interesting.
Wow. I wonder if "page views" is being accurately tracked because of the weird frames that their sites use now. The visits don't seem that radically different...Seda said:http://www.sitemeter.com/default.asp?action=stats&site=sm5kotaku&report=12
The redesign went up on the 7th.
Though this was interesting.
Aquavelvaman said:Wow. I wonder if "page views" is being accurately tracked because of the weird frames that their sites use now. The visits don't seem that radically different...
Wow if accurate.Seda said:http://www.sitemeter.com/default.asp?action=stats&site=sm5kotaku&report=12
The redesign went up on the 7th.
Thought this was interesting.
Seda said:http://www.sitemeter.com/default.asp?action=stats&site=sm5kotaku&report=12
The redesign went up on the 7th.
Thought this was interesting.
Seda said:http://www.sitemeter.com/default.asp?action=stats&site=sm5kotaku&report=12
The redesign went up on the 7th.
Thought this was interesting.
Aquavelvaman said:Wow. I wonder if "page views" is being accurately tracked because of the weird frames that their sites use now. The visits don't seem that radically different...