It don't. :v
I know it doesn't, but I personally know a lot of people who think it does.
Edit: fuck I'm at the top of the page
It don't. :v
I know it doesn't, but I personally know a lot of people who think it does.
Edit: fuck I'm at the top of the page
I have to ask, why is "transgendered" a slur? At a glance, it seems to be but a small spelling variation.
When people slip, the best thing to happen is to make sure to have someone point out where you slipped so you don't do it again. I have no concept of whether you slipped or if you legitimately were ignorant of the proper terminology, and when you ignore the correction, it's important to me to make sure that you don't ignore it, for the same reason why you would see that happen when someone says something - even accidentally or through ignorant - that is offensive to another person. It has nothing to do with being on a high-horse and more to do with constructive criticism.
I have to ask, why is "transgendered" a slur? At a glance, it seems to be but a small spelling variation.
Cool. No need to pound it in with: "Also I'm going to hope that you read #2 and will take that to heart and use the proper terminology in the future."
If you truly want to educate or correct someone then there's no need for a follow-up self gratifying remark. It just comes off as insufferable as in, "it's great you took my advice, here's who told you this advice... ME!"
It's not a slur, it's just wrong. Like "homosexualed." It implies that someone "becomes" trans instead of that someone "is" trans.
Well, wouldn't the underlying state be transexual? I thought transgender referred to someone who has undergone sexual reassignment, so an ed at the end wouldn't really be wrong.And far be it from me to claim otherwise; it's just always helpful, especially in threads like these, to make sure. :>
Also hue
It's not a slur, it's just wrong. Like "homosexualed." It implies that someone "becomes" trans instead of that someone "is" trans.
Well, wouldn't the underlying state be transexual? I thought transgender referred to someone who has undergone sexual reassignment, so an ed at the end wouldn't really be wrong.
Would you want to have sex with them? If yes, then you find them attractive.
I'm bisexual so yeah, all the time
Ill drink to thisi love dick
Some people are asexual, though.
I'm a hardcore lipstick lesbian so yeah.
That's boss as fuck.I'm lipstick half the time, the other half stud.
Fuck it, I'm gonna rephrase it. On the scatterplot of sexuality, I don't give a damn. I love Guys, Girls, Chicks with Dicks, Dudes without Dicks, and every possible point in between. Why limit your sexuality in this world between homo or hetero? Fuckin' go gray-scale man! Go find that cute guy out there with hips that would make your jaw hit the floor! Because unbeknownst to most, sexual orientation can be pretty damn fluid.
I always find comments like this funny. It's like you can't comprehend that to a straight guy, there's no man out there that could be considered 'cute' with 'hips that would make your jaw hit the floor'. I've seen 10s of thousands of guys pass by in my life. The thought just doesn't occur.
You're bi, that's cool. But assuming that straight people are closed minded is just as ignorant as those who think gays can be cured.
At work last Friday we had a lunch treat. My heart dropped when I found out it was a lobster lunch. Everyone else was delighted - an expensive treat. But my taste buds get one whiff of lobster and I want to hurl. I can't explain it. It's not socialised behaviour, it's not learned behaviour, the first time I ever smelled and tasted lobster I knew I found it disgusting. Over the 30 years of my life that hasn't changed. Yet people will tell me 'Lobster is delicious! Open your mind!' as if I'm somehow incapable of knowing what I am and am not capable of liking, or as if I should push through a barrier of distaste on the off chance that there might be some nugget of pleasure on the other side.
That's what it's like when you say 'don't limit yourself!' to someone with a defined sexuality. It's just silly.
As someone noted though, why do hetero men get so much more repulsed by other men than hetero women are by women or gay men are by men?
Who's repulsed? I just literally have no sexual interest in other men. Why would I? I'm straight.
Why is it appalling? I'm repulsed at the idea of having sex with a woman, having sex with a morbidly obese man, a really really old man, a diseased man, an obnoxious asshole of a man, a short-haired man, a really unattractive man, and so on. There's nothing wrong or "appalling" (lol) with that.This is so interesting to me, because as a gay person who has extremely limited attraction to women, kissing a woman would never seem repulsive to me. In fact, sex with a woman doesn't seem all that displeasing really.
The number of men who are *repulsed* at the thought of even having light sexual contact with someone of the same gender is kind of appalling.
Eh, maybe, but frankly you shouldn't generalize about straight women either. The thought of eating out a woman makes me want to hurl, no matter how gorgeous she is.I'm not really accusing anyone of anything, it's just that you should analyze why you think it's so gross to touch another guy in that way when that same feeling doesn't really exist for straight women and gay men in regards to other women. Men are just socialized in a way to view each in a very non-sexual manner and I feel like a lot of guys internalize that.
*eye roll* No.Übermatik;214628607 said:I think complete, 100% heterosexuality is a rarity. [...] Am I making sense?
But I wasn't replying to you, I was specifically talking about repulsion straight men have re: other men in a sexual context versus the repulsion (or lack thereof) that exists in other groups.
But I wasn't replying to you, I was specifically talking about repulsion straight men have re: other men in a sexual context versus the repulsion (or lack thereof) that exists in other groups.
Yup. Just checked out a girls ass at work.
I'm telling HR...
To play DA , some women do feel repulsed (or at least dislike) the idea of being with other women, gay guys too.As someone noted though, why do hetero men get so much more repulsed by other men than hetero women are by women or gay men are by men?
I always find comments like this funny. It's like you can't comprehend that to a straight guy, there's no man out there that could be considered 'cute' with 'hips that would make your jaw hit the floor'. I've seen 10s of thousands of guys pass by in my life. The thought just doesn't occur.
You're bi, that's cool. But assuming that straight people are closed minded is just as ignorant as those who think gays can be cured.
At work last Friday we had a lunch treat. My heart dropped when I found out it was a lobster lunch. Everyone else was delighted - an expensive treat. But my taste buds get one whiff of lobster and I want to hurl. I can't explain it. It's not socialised behaviour, it's not learned behaviour, the first time I ever smelled and tasted lobster I knew I found it disgusting. Over the 30 years of my life that hasn't changed. Yet people will tell me 'Lobster is delicious! Open your mind!' as if I'm somehow incapable of knowing what I am and am not capable of liking, or as if I should push through a barrier of distaste on the off chance that there might be some nugget of pleasure on the other side.
That's what it's like when you say 'don't limit yourself!' to someone with a defined sexuality. It's just silly.
Why is it appalling? I'm repulsed at the idea of having sex with a woman, having sex with a morbidly obese man, a really really old man, a diseased man, an obnoxious asshole of a man, a short-haired man, a really unattractive man, and so on. There's nothing wrong or "appalling" (lol) with that.
But I wasn't replying to you, I was specifically talking about repulsion straight men have re: other men in a sexual context versus the repulsion (or lack thereof) that exists in other groups.